On the Expressive Power of Schedulers in Distributed Probabilistic Systems

AbstractIn this paper, we consider several subclasses of distributed schedulers and we investigate the ability of these subclasses to attain worst-case probabilities.Based on previous work, we consider the class of distributed schedulers, and we prove that randomization adds no extra power to distributed schedulers when trying to attain the supremum probability of any measurable set, thus showing that the subclass of deterministic schedulers suffices to attain the worst-case probability. Traditional schedulers are a particular case of distributed schedulers. So, since our result holds for any measurable set, our proof generalizes the well-known result that randomization adds no extra power to schedulers when trying to maximize the probability of an ω-regular language. However, non-Markovian schedulers are needed to attain supremum probabilities in distributed systems.We develop another class of schedulers (the strongly distributed schedulers) that restricts the nondeterminism concerning the order in which components execute. We compare this class against previous approaches in the same direction, showing that our definition is an important contribution. For this class, we show that randomized and non-Markovian schedulers are needed to attain worst-case probabilities.We also discuss the subclass of finite-memory schedulers, showing the intractability of the model checking problem for these schedulers

Testing Reactive Probabilistic Processes

We define a testing equivalence in the spirit of De Nicola and Hennessy for reactive probabilistic processes, i.e. for processes where the internal nondeterminism is due to random behaviour. We characterize the testing equivalence in terms of ready-traces. From the characterization it follows that the equivalence is insensitive to the exact moment in time in which an internal probabilistic choice occurs, which is inherent from the original testing equivalence of De Nicola and Hennessy. We also show decidability of the testing equivalence for finite systems for which the complete model may not be known

Using schedulers to test probabilistic distributed systems

This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00165-012-0244-5. Copyright © 2012, British Computer Society.Formal methods are one of the most important approaches to increasing the confidence in the correctness of software systems. A formal specification can be used as an oracle in testing since one can determine whether an observed behaviour is allowed by the specification. This is an important feature of formal testing: behaviours of the system observed in testing are compared with the specification and ideally this comparison is automated. In this paper we study a formal testing framework to deal with systems that interact with their environment at physically distributed interfaces, called ports, and where choices between different possibilities are probabilistically quantified. Building on previous work, we introduce two families of schedulers to resolve nondeterministic choices among different actions of the system. The first type of schedulers, which we call global schedulers, resolves nondeterministic choices by representing the environment as a single global scheduler. The second type, which we call localised schedulers, models the environment as a set of schedulers with there being one scheduler for each port. We formally define the application of schedulers to systems and provide and study different implementation relations in this setting

Reconciling real and stochastic time: The need for probabilistic refinement

We conservatively extend anACP-style discrete-time process theorywith discrete stochastic delays. The semantics of the timed delays relies on time additivity and time determinism, which are properties that enable us to merge subsequent timed delays and to impose their synchronous expiration. Stochastic delays, however, interact with respect to a so-called race condition that determines the set of delays that expire first, which is guided by an (implicit) probabilistic choice. The race condition precludes the property of time additivity as the merger of stochastic delays alters this probabilistic behavior. To this end, we resolve the race condition using conditionally- distributed unit delays. We give a sound and ground-complete axiomatization of the process theory comprising the standard set of ACP-style operators. In this generalized setting, the alternative composition is no longer associative, so we have to resort to special normal forms that explicitly resolve the underlying race condition. Our treatment succeeds in the initial challenge to conservatively extend standard time with stochastic time. However, the 'dissection' of the stochastic delays to conditionally-distributed unit delays comes at a price, as we can no longer relate the resolved race condition to the original stochastic delays. We seek a solution in the field of probabilistic refinements that enable the interchange of probabilistic and non deterministic choices.Fil: Markovski, J.. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; Países BajosFil: D'argenio, Pedro Ruben. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Baeten, J. C. M.. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; Países Bajos. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica; Países BajosFil: De Vink, E. P.. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; Países Bajos. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica; Países Bajo