14 research outputs found
On the Bit Complexity of Sum-of-Squares Proofs
It has often been claimed in recent papers that one can find a degree d Sum-of-Squares proof if one exists via the Ellipsoid algorithm. In a recent paper, Ryan O\u27Donnell notes this widely quoted claim is not necessarily true. He presents an example of a polynomial system with bounded coefficients that admits low-degree proofs of non-negativity, but these proofs necessarily involve numbers with an exponential number of bits, causing the Ellipsoid algorithm to take exponential time. In this paper we obtain both positive and negative results on the bit complexity of SoS proofs.
First, we propose a sufficient condition on a polynomial system that implies a bound on the coefficients in an SoS proof. We demonstrate that this sufficient condition is applicable for common use-cases of the SoS algorithm, such as Max-CSP, Balanced Separator, Max-Clique, Max-Bisection, and Unit-Vector constraints.
On the negative side, O\u27Donnell asked whether every polynomial system containing Boolean constraints admits proofs of polynomial bit complexity. We answer this question in the negative, giving a counterexample system and non-negative polynomial which has degree two SoS proofs, but no SoS proof with small coefficients until degree sqrt(n)
New Dependencies of Hierarchies in Polynomial Optimization
We compare four key hierarchies for solving Constrained Polynomial
Optimization Problems (CPOP): Sum of Squares (SOS), Sum of Diagonally Dominant
Polynomials (SDSOS), Sum of Nonnegative Circuits (SONC), and the Sherali Adams
(SA) hierarchies. We prove a collection of dependencies among these hierarchies
both for general CPOPs and for optimization problems on the Boolean hypercube.
Key results include for the general case that the SONC and SOS hierarchy are
polynomially incomparable, while SDSOS is contained in SONC. A direct
consequence is the non-existence of a Putinar-like Positivstellensatz for
SDSOS. On the Boolean hypercube, we show as a main result that Schm\"udgen-like
versions of the hierarchies SDSOS*, SONC*, and SA* are polynomially equivalent.
Moreover, we show that SA* is contained in any Schm\"udgen-like hierarchy that
provides a O(n) degree bound.Comment: 26 pages, 4 figure
A note on the computational complexity of the moment-SOS hierarchy for polynomial optimization
The moment-sum-of-squares (moment-SOS) hierarchy is one of the most
celebrated and widely applied methods for approximating the minimum of an
n-variate polynomial over a feasible region defined by polynomial
(in)equalities. A key feature of the hierarchy is that, at a fixed level, it
can be formulated as a semidefinite program of size polynomial in the number of
variables n. Although this suggests that it may therefore be computed in
polynomial time, this is not necessarily the case. Indeed, as O'Donnell (2017)
and later Raghavendra & Weitz (2017) show, there exist examples where the
sos-representations used in the hierarchy have exponential bit-complexity. We
study the computational complexity of the moment-SOS hierarchy, complementing
and expanding upon earlier work of Raghavendra & Weitz (2017). In particular,
we establish algebraic and geometric conditions under which polynomial-time
computation is guaranteed to be possible.Comment: 10 page
The power of sum-of-squares for detecting hidden structures
We study planted problems---finding hidden structures in random noisy
inputs---through the lens of the sum-of-squares semidefinite programming
hierarchy (SoS). This family of powerful semidefinite programs has recently
yielded many new algorithms for planted problems, often achieving the best
known polynomial-time guarantees in terms of accuracy of recovered solutions
and robustness to noise. One theme in recent work is the design of spectral
algorithms which match the guarantees of SoS algorithms for planted problems.
Classical spectral algorithms are often unable to accomplish this: the twist in
these new spectral algorithms is the use of spectral structure of matrices
whose entries are low-degree polynomials of the input variables. We prove that
for a wide class of planted problems, including refuting random constraint
satisfaction problems, tensor and sparse PCA, densest-k-subgraph, community
detection in stochastic block models, planted clique, and others, eigenvalues
of degree-d matrix polynomials are as powerful as SoS semidefinite programs of
roughly degree d. For such problems it is therefore always possible to match
the guarantees of SoS without solving a large semidefinite program. Using
related ideas on SoS algorithms and low-degree matrix polynomials (and inspired
by recent work on SoS and the planted clique problem by Barak et al.), we prove
new nearly-tight SoS lower bounds for the tensor and sparse principal component
analysis problems. Our lower bounds for sparse principal component analysis are
the first to suggest that going beyond existing algorithms for this problem may
require sub-exponential time