Syntactic Complexity of R- and J-Trivial Regular Languages

The syntactic complexity of a regular language is the cardinality of its syntactic semigroup. The syntactic complexity of a subclass of the class of regular languages is the maximal syntactic complexity of languages in that class, taken as a function of the state complexity n of these languages. We study the syntactic complexity of R- and J-trivial regular languages, and prove that n! and floor of [e(n-1)!] are tight upper bounds for these languages, respectively. We also prove that 2^{n-1} is the tight upper bound on the state complexity of reversal of J-trivial regular languages.Comment: 17 pages, 5 figures, 1 tabl

Representability of nonregular languages in finite probabilistic automata

In this paper the necessary and sufficient conditions of representability of nonregular languages in finite probabilistic automata are formulated

Universal computation and other capabilities of hybrid and continuous dynamical systems

Caption title.Includes bibliographical references (p. 25-27).Supported by the Army Research Office and the Center for Intelligent Control Systems. DAAL03-92-G-0164 DAAL03-92-G-0115Michael S. Branicky

Non-Deterministic Communication Complexity of Regular Languages

In this thesis, we study the place of regular languages within the communication complexity setting. In particular, we are interested in the non-deterministic communication complexity of regular languages. We show that a regular language has either O(1) or Omega(log n) non-deterministic complexity. We obtain several linear lower bound results which cover a wide range of regular languages having linear non-deterministic complexity. These lower bound results also imply a result in semigroup theory: we obtain sufficient conditions for not being in the positive variety Pol(Com). To obtain our results, we use algebraic techniques. In the study of regular languages, the algebraic point of view pioneered by Eilenberg (\cite{Eil74}) has led to many interesting results. Viewing a semigroup as a computational device that recognizes languages has proven to be prolific from both semigroup theory and formal languages perspectives. In this thesis, we provide further instances of such mutualism.Comment: Master's thesis, 93 page