Learning from eXtreme Bandit Feedback

We study the problem of batch learning from bandit feedback in the setting of extremely large action spaces. Learning from extreme bandit feedback is ubiquitous in recommendation systems, in which billions of decisions are made over sets consisting of millions of choices in a single day, yielding massive observational data. In these large-scale real-world applications, supervised learning frameworks such as eXtreme Multi-label Classification (XMC) are widely used despite the fact that they incur significant biases due to the mismatch between bandit feedback and supervised labels. Such biases can be mitigated by importance sampling techniques, but these techniques suffer from impractical variance when dealing with a large number of actions. In this paper, we introduce a selective importance sampling estimator (sIS) that operates in a significantly more favorable bias-variance regime. The sIS estimator is obtained by performing importance sampling on the conditional expectation of the reward with respect to a small subset of actions for each instance (a form of Rao-Blackwellization). We employ this estimator in a novel algorithmic procedure -- named Policy Optimization for eXtreme Models (POXM) -- for learning from bandit feedback on XMC tasks. In POXM, the selected actions for the sIS estimator are the top-p actions of the logging policy, where p is adjusted from the data and is significantly smaller than the size of the action space. We use a supervised-to-bandit conversion on three XMC datasets to benchmark our POXM method against three competing methods: BanditNet, a previously applied partial matching pruning strategy, and a supervised learning baseline. Whereas BanditNet sometimes improves marginally over the logging policy, our experiments show that POXM systematically and significantly improves over all baselines

Counterfactual Risk Minimization: Learning from Logged Bandit Feedback

We develop a learning principle and an efficient algorithm for batch learning from logged bandit feedback. This learning setting is ubiquitous in online systems (e.g., ad placement, web search, recommendation), where an algorithm makes a prediction (e.g., ad ranking) for a given input (e.g., query) and observes bandit feedback (e.g., user clicks on presented ads). We first address the counterfactual nature of the learning problem through propensity scoring. Next, we prove generalization error bounds that account for the variance of the propensity-weighted empirical risk estimator. These constructive bounds give rise to the Counterfactual Risk Minimization (CRM) principle. We show how CRM can be used to derive a new learning method -- called Policy Optimizer for Exponential Models (POEM) -- for learning stochastic linear rules for structured output prediction. We present a decomposition of the POEM objective that enables efficient stochastic gradient optimization. POEM is evaluated on several multi-label classification problems showing substantially improved robustness and generalization performance compared to the state-of-the-art.Comment: 10 page

Preference Learning

This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 14101 “Preference Learning”. Preferences have recently received considerable attention in disciplines such as machine learning, knowledge discovery, information retrieval, statistics, social choice theory, multiple criteria decision making, decision under risk and uncertainty, operations research, and others. The motivation for this seminar was to showcase recent progress in these different areas with the goal of working towards a common basis of understanding, which should help to facilitate future synergies

New Directions in Online Learning: Boosting, Partial Information, and Non-Stationarity

Online learning, where a learning algorithm fits a model on-the-fly with streaming data, has become an important research area in machine learning. Batch learning, where the entire data set has to be available to the learning algorithm, is not always a suitable paradigm for the big data era. It is increasingly common in many practical situations, such as online ads prediction or control of self-driving cars, that data instances naturally arrive in a sequential manner. In these situations, researchers want to update their model in an online fashion. This dissertation pursues several topics at the frontier of online learning research. In Chapter 2 and Chapter 3, the journey starts with online boosting. Online boosting studies how to combine multiple online weak learners to get a stronger learner. Chapter 2 considers online multi-class classification problems. Chapter 3 focuses on the more challenging multi-label ranking problem where there are multiple correct labels and the learner outputs a ranking of labels based on their relevance. In both chapters, an optimal algorithm and an adaptive algorithm are proposed. The optimal algorithms require a minimal number of weak learners to attain the desired accuracy. The adaptive algorithms are practically more useful since they do not require a priori knowledge about the strength of weak learners and are more computationally efficient. The adaptive algorithms are not statistically optimal but they still come with reasonable performance guarantees. The empirical results on real data sets support the theoretical findings and the proposed boosting algorithms outperformed existing competitors on benchmark data sets. Chapter 4 considers the partial information setting, where the learner does not receive the true labels. Partial feedback is common in practice as obtaining complete feedback can be costly. The chapter revisits the boosting algorithms that are presented in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 and extends them to work with partial information feedback. Despite the learner receiving much less information, comparable performance guarantees can be made. Later in Chapter 5 and Chapter 6, we move on to another interesting area in online learning called restless bandit problems. Unlike the classical (stochastic) multi-armed bandit problems where the reward distributions are unknown but stationary, in restless bandit problems the distributions can change over time. This extra layer of complexity allows us to study more complicated models, but the analysis becomes even more difficult. In restless bandit problems, it is assumed that each arm has a state that evolves according to an unknown Markov process, and the reward distribution depends on the arm's current state. This setting can be thought of as a sub-class of reinforcement learning and the partial observability inherent in this problem makes the analysis very challenging. The well known Thompson Sampling algorithm is analyzed and a Bayesian regret bound for it is derived. Chapter 5 considers the episodic case where the system periodically resets. Chapter 6 extends the analysis to the more challenging non-episodic (i.e., infinite time horizon) case. In both settings, Thompson Sampling algorithms (with slight modifications) enjoy sub-linear regret bounds, and the empirical results on simulated data support this fact. The experiments also suggest the possibility that the algorithm can be used in the frequentist setting even though the theoretical bounds are only shown for the Bayesian regret.PHDStatisticsUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/155110/1/yhjung_1.pd