15 research outputs found

    Extremal eigenvalues of local Hamiltonians

    Get PDF
    We apply classical algorithms for approximately solving constraint satisfaction problems to find bounds on extremal eigenvalues of local Hamiltonians. We consider spin Hamiltonians for which we have an upper bound on the number of terms in which each spin participates, and find extensive bounds for the operator norm and ground-state energy of such Hamiltonians under this constraint. In each case the bound is achieved by a product state which can be found efficiently using a classical algorithm.Comment: 5 pages; v4: uses standard journal styl

    Computing the partition function of a polynomial on the Boolean cube

    Full text link
    For a polynomial f: {-1, 1}^n --> C, we define the partition function as the average of e^{lambda f(x)} over all points x in {-1, 1}^n, where lambda in C is a parameter. We present a quasi-polynomial algorithm, which, given such f, lambda and epsilon >0 approximates the partition function within a relative error of epsilon in N^{O(ln n -ln epsilon)} time provided |lambda| < 1/(2 L sqrt{deg f}), where L=L(f) is a parameter bounding the Lipschitz constant of f from above and N is the number of monomials in f. As a corollary, we obtain a quasi-polynomial algorithm, which, given such an f with coefficients +1 and -1 and such that every variable enters not more than 4 monomials, approximates the maximum of f on {-1, 1}^n within a factor of O(sqrt{deg f}/delta), provided the maximum is N delta for some 0< delta <1. If every variable enters not more than k monomials for some fixed k > 4, we are able to establish a similar result when delta > (k-1)/k.Comment: The final version of this paper is due to be published in the collection of papers "A Journey through Discrete Mathematics. A Tribute to Jiri Matousek" edited by Martin Loebl, Jaroslav Nesetril and Robin Thomas, to be published by Springe

    Beating the random assignment on constraint satisfaction problems of bounded degree

    Get PDF
    We show that for any odd kk and any instance of the Max-kXOR constraint satisfaction problem, there is an efficient algorithm that finds an assignment satisfying at least a 12+Ξ©(1/D)\frac{1}{2} + \Omega(1/\sqrt{D}) fraction of constraints, where DD is a bound on the number of constraints that each variable occurs in. This improves both qualitatively and quantitatively on the recent work of Farhi, Goldstone, and Gutmann (2014), which gave a \emph{quantum} algorithm to find an assignment satisfying a 12+Ξ©(Dβˆ’3/4)\frac{1}{2} + \Omega(D^{-3/4}) fraction of the equations. For arbitrary constraint satisfaction problems, we give a similar result for "triangle-free" instances; i.e., an efficient algorithm that finds an assignment satisfying at least a ΞΌ+Ξ©(1/D)\mu + \Omega(1/\sqrt{D}) fraction of constraints, where ΞΌ\mu is the fraction that would be satisfied by a uniformly random assignment.Comment: 14 pages, 1 figur

    Hardness of Approximating Bounded-Degree Max 2-CSP and Independent Set on k-Claw-Free Graphs

    Full text link
    We consider the question of approximating Max 2-CSP where each variable appears in at most dd constraints (but with possibly arbitrarily large alphabet). There is a simple (d+12)(\frac{d+1}{2})-approximation algorithm for the problem. We prove the following results for any sufficiently large dd: - Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), it is NP-hard (under randomized reduction) to approximate this problem to within a factor of (d2βˆ’o(d))\left(\frac{d}{2} - o(d)\right). - It is NP-hard (under randomized reduction) to approximate the problem to within a factor of (d3βˆ’o(d))\left(\frac{d}{3} - o(d)\right). Thanks to a known connection [Dvorak et al., Algorithmica 2023], we establish the following hardness results for approximating Maximum Independent Set on kk-claw-free graphs: - Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), it is NP-hard (under randomized reduction) to approximate this problem to within a factor of (k4βˆ’o(k))\left(\frac{k}{4} - o(k)\right). - It is NP-hard (under randomized reduction) to approximate the problem to within a factor of (k3+22βˆ’o(k))β‰₯(k5.829βˆ’o(k))\left(\frac{k}{3 + 2\sqrt{2}} - o(k)\right) \geq \left(\frac{k}{5.829} - o(k)\right). In comparison, known approximation algorithms achieve (k2βˆ’o(k))\left(\frac{k}{2} - o(k)\right)-approximation in polynomial time [Neuwohner, STACS 2021; Thiery and Ward, SODA 2023] and (k3+o(k))(\frac{k}{3} + o(k))-approximation in quasi-polynomial time [Cygan et al., SODA 2013]

    A quantum advantage over classical for local max cut

    Full text link
    We compare the performance of a quantum local algorithm to a similar classical counterpart on a well-established combinatorial optimization problem LocalMaxCut. We show that a popular quantum algorithm first discovered by Farhi, Goldstone, and Gutmannn [1] called the quantum optimization approximation algorithm (QAOA) has a computational advantage over comparable local classical techniques on degree-3 graphs. These results hint that even small-scale quantum computation, which is relevant to the current state-of the art quantum hardware, could have significant advantages over comparably simple classical computation

    Extremal eigenvalues of local Hamiltonians

    Get PDF
    corecore