5,314 research outputs found
Imitative Follower Deception in Stackelberg Games
Information uncertainty is one of the major challenges facing applications of
game theory. In the context of Stackelberg games, various approaches have been
proposed to deal with the leader's incomplete knowledge about the follower's
payoffs, typically by gathering information from the leader's interaction with
the follower. Unfortunately, these approaches rely crucially on the assumption
that the follower will not strategically exploit this information asymmetry,
i.e., the follower behaves truthfully during the interaction according to their
actual payoffs. As we show in this paper, the follower may have strong
incentives to deceitfully imitate the behavior of a different follower type
and, in doing this, benefit significantly from inducing the leader into
choosing a highly suboptimal strategy. This raises a fundamental question: how
to design a leader strategy in the presence of a deceitful follower? To answer
this question, we put forward a basic model of Stackelberg games with
(imitative) follower deception and show that the leader is indeed able to
reduce the loss due to follower deception with carefully designed policies. We
then provide a systematic study of the problem of computing the optimal leader
policy and draw a relatively complete picture of the complexity landscape;
essentially matching positive and negative complexity results are provided for
natural variants of the model. Our intractability results are in sharp contrast
to the situation with no deception, where the leader's optimal strategy can be
computed in polynomial time, and thus illustrate the intrinsic difficulty of
handling follower deception. Through simulations we also examine the benefit of
considering follower deception in randomly generated games
Robust Stackelberg Equilibria in Extensive-Form Games and Extension to Limited Lookahead
Stackelberg equilibria have become increasingly important as a solution
concept in computational game theory, largely inspired by practical problems
such as security settings. In practice, however, there is typically uncertainty
regarding the model about the opponent. This paper is, to our knowledge, the
first to investigate Stackelberg equilibria under uncertainty in extensive-form
games, one of the broadest classes of game. We introduce robust Stackelberg
equilibria, where the uncertainty is about the opponent's payoffs, as well as
ones where the opponent has limited lookahead and the uncertainty is about the
opponent's node evaluation function. We develop a new mixed-integer program for
the deterministic limited-lookahead setting. We then extend the program to the
robust setting for Stackelberg equilibrium under unlimited and under limited
lookahead by the opponent. We show that for the specific case of interval
uncertainty about the opponent's payoffs (or about the opponent's node
evaluations in the case of limited lookahead), robust Stackelberg equilibria
can be computed with a mixed-integer program that is of the same asymptotic
size as that for the deterministic setting.Comment: Published at AAAI1
Quasi-Perfect Stackelberg Equilibrium
Equilibrium refinements are important in extensive-form (i.e., tree-form)
games, where they amend weaknesses of the Nash equilibrium concept by requiring
sequential rationality and other beneficial properties. One of the most
attractive refinement concepts is quasi-perfect equilibrium. While
quasi-perfection has been studied in extensive-form games, it is poorly
understood in Stackelberg settings---that is, settings where a leader can
commit to a strategy---which are important for modeling, for example, security
games. In this paper, we introduce the axiomatic definition of quasi-perfect
Stackelberg equilibrium. We develop a broad class of game perturbation schemes
that lead to them in the limit. Our class of perturbation schemes strictly
generalizes prior perturbation schemes introduced for the computation of
(non-Stackelberg) quasi-perfect equilibria. Based on our perturbation schemes,
we develop a branch-and-bound algorithm for computing a quasi-perfect
Stackelberg equilibrium. It leverages a perturbed variant of the linear program
for computing a Stackelberg extensive-form correlated equilibrium. Experiments
show that our algorithm can be used to find an approximate quasi-perfect
Stackelberg equilibrium in games with thousands of nodes
On the Inducibility of Stackelberg Equilibrium for Security Games
Strong Stackelberg equilibrium (SSE) is the standard solution concept of
Stackelberg security games. As opposed to the weak Stackelberg equilibrium
(WSE), the SSE assumes that the follower breaks ties in favor of the leader and
this is widely acknowledged and justified by the assertion that the defender
can often induce the attacker to choose a preferred action by making an
infinitesimal adjustment to her strategy. Unfortunately, in security games with
resource assignment constraints, the assertion might not be valid; it is
possible that the defender cannot induce the desired outcome. As a result, many
results claimed in the literature may be overly optimistic. To remedy, we first
formally define the utility guarantee of a defender strategy and provide
examples to show that the utility of SSE can be higher than its utility
guarantee. Second, inspired by the analysis of leader's payoff by Von Stengel
and Zamir (2004), we provide the solution concept called the inducible
Stackelberg equilibrium (ISE), which owns the highest utility guarantee and
always exists. Third, we show the conditions when ISE coincides with SSE and
the fact that in general case, SSE can be extremely worse with respect to
utility guarantee. Moreover, introducing the ISE does not invalidate existing
algorithmic results as the problem of computing an ISE polynomially reduces to
that of computing an SSE. We also provide an algorithmic implementation for
computing ISE, with which our experiments unveil the empirical advantage of the
ISE over the SSE.Comment: The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligenc
- …