On vanishing of Kronecker coefficients

We show that the problem of deciding positivity of Kronecker coefficients is NP-hard. Previously, this problem was conjectured to be in P, just as for the Littlewood-Richardson coefficients. Our result establishes in a formal way that Kronecker coefficients are more difficult than Littlewood-Richardson coefficients, unless P=NP. We also show that there exists a #P-formula for a particular subclass of Kronecker coefficients whose positivity is NP-hard to decide. This is an evidence that, despite the hardness of the positivity problem, there may well exist a positive combinatorial formula for the Kronecker coefficients. Finding such a formula is a major open problem in representation theory and algebraic combinatorics. Finally, we consider the existence of the partition triples $(\lambda, \mu, \pi)$ such that the Kronecker coefficient $k^\lambda_{\mu, \pi} = 0$ but the Kronecker coefficient $k^{l \lambda}_{l \mu, l \pi} > 0$ for some integer $l>1$. Such "holes" are of great interest as they witness the failure of the saturation property for the Kronecker coefficients, which is still poorly understood. Using insight from computational complexity theory, we turn our hardness proof into a positive result: We show that not only do there exist many such triples, but they can also be found efficiently. Specifically, we show that, for any $0<\epsilon\leq1$, there exists $0<a<1$ such that, for all $m$, there exist $\Omega(2^{m^a})$ partition triples $(\lambda,\mu,\mu)$ in the Kronecker cone such that: (a) the Kronecker coefficient $k^\lambda_{\mu,\mu}$ is zero, (b) the height of $\mu$ is $m$, (c) the height of $\lambda$ is $\le m^\epsilon$, and (d) $|\lambda|=|\mu| \le m^3$. The proof of the last result illustrates the effectiveness of the explicit proof strategy of GCT.Comment: 43 pages, 1 figur

The Complexity of Kings

A king in a directed graph is a node from which each node in the graph can be reached via paths of length at most two. There is a broad literature on tournaments (completely oriented digraphs), and it has been known for more than half a century that all tournaments have at least one king [Lan53]. Recently, kings have proven useful in theoretical computer science, in particular in the study of the complexity of the semifeasible sets [HNP98,HT05] and in the study of the complexity of reachability problems [Tan01,NT02]. In this paper, we study the complexity of recognizing kings. For each succinctly specified family of tournaments, the king problem is known to belong to $\Pi_2^p$ [HOZZ]. We prove that this bound is optimal: We construct a succinctly specified tournament family whose king problem is $\Pi_2^p$-complete. It follows easily from our proof approach that the problem of testing kingship in succinctly specified graphs (which need not be tournaments) is $\Pi_2^p$-complete. We also obtain $\Pi_2^p$-completeness results for k-kings in succinctly specified j-partite tournaments, $k,j \geq 2$, and we generalize our main construction to show that $\Pi_2^p$-completeness holds for testing k-kingship in succinctly specified families of tournaments for all $k \geq 2$

On symmetric differences of NP-hard sets with weakly P-selective sets

AbstractThe symmetric differences of NP-hard sets with weakly-P-selective sets are investigated. We show that if there exist a weakly-P-selective set A and an NP-⩽Pm-hard set H such that H - AϵPbtt(sparse) and A — HϵPm(sparse) then P = NP. So no NP-⩽Pm-hard set has sparse symmetric difference with any weakly-P-selective set unless P = NP. The proof of our main result is an interesting application of the tree prunning techniques (Fortune 1979; Mahaney 1982). In addition, we show that there exists a P-selective set which has exponentially dense symmetric difference with every set in Pbtt(sparse)

The density and complexity of polynomial cores for intractable sets

Let A be a recursive problem not in P. Lynch has shown that A then has an infinite recursive polynomial complexity core. This is a collection C of instances of A such that every algorithm deciding A needs more than polynomial time almost everywhere on C. We investigate the complexity of recognizing the instances in such a core, and show that every recursive problem A not in P has an infinite core recognizable in subexponential time. We further study how dense the core sets for A can be, under various assumptions about the structure of A. Our main results in this direction are that if P ≠ NP, then NP-complete problems have polynomially nonsparse cores recognizable in subexponential time, and that EXPTIME-complete problems have cores of exponential density recognizable in exponential time

On inefficient special cases of NP-complete problems

AbstractEvery intractable set A has a polynomial complexity core, a set H such that for any P-subset S of A or of Ā, S∩H is finite. A complexity core H of A is proper if H⊆A. It is shown here that if P≠NP, then every currently known (i.e., either invertibly paddable or k-creative) NP-complete set A and its complement Ā have proper polynomial complexity cores that are nonsparse and are accepted by deterministic machines in time 2cn for some constant c. Turning to the intractable class DEXT=∪c>0DTIME(2cn), it is shown that every set that is ⩽pm-complete for DEXT has an infinite proper polynomial complexity core that is nonsparse and recursive

Structure vs. Randomness for Bilinear Maps

We prove that the slice rank of a 3-tensor (a combinatorial notion introduced by Tao in the context of the cap-set problem), the analytic rank (a Fourier-theoretic notion introduced by Gowers and Wolf), and the geometric rank (a recently introduced algebro-geometric notion) are all equivalent up to an absolute constant. As a corollary, we obtain strong trade-offs on the arithmetic complexity of a biased bililnear map, and on the separation between computing a bilinear map exactly and on average. Our result settles open questions of Haramaty and Shpilka [STOC 2010], and of Lovett [Discrete Anal., 2019] for 3-tensors.Comment: Submitted on November 6, 2020 to the 53rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). Accepted on February 6, 202

On Vanishing of {K}ronecker Coefficients

It is shown that: (1) The problem of deciding positivity of Kronecker coefficients is NP-hard. (2) There exists a positive ($\# P$)-formula for a subclass of Kronecker coefficients whose positivity is NP-hard to decide. (3) For any $0 < \epsilon \le 1$, there exists $0<a<1$ such that, for all $m$, there exist $\Omega(2^{m^a})$ partition triples $(\lambda,\mu,\mu)$ in the Kronecker cone such that: (a) the Kronecker coefficient $k^\lambda_{\mu,\mu}$ is zero, (b) the height of $\mu$ is $m$, (c) the height of $\lambda$ is $\le m^\epsilon$, and (d) $|\lambda|= |\mu| \le m^3$. The last result takes a step towards proving the existence of occurrence-based representation-theoretic obstructions in the context of the GCT approach to the permanent vs. determinant problem. Its proof also illustrates the effectiveness of the explicit proof strategy of GCT