2,788 research outputs found
Consistency of circuit lower bounds with bounded theories
Proving that there are problems in that require
boolean circuits of super-linear size is a major frontier in complexity theory.
While such lower bounds are known for larger complexity classes, existing
results only show that the corresponding problems are hard on infinitely many
input lengths. For instance, proving almost-everywhere circuit lower bounds is
open even for problems in . Giving the notorious difficulty of
proving lower bounds that hold for all large input lengths, we ask the
following question: Can we show that a large set of techniques cannot prove
that is easy infinitely often? Motivated by this and related
questions about the interaction between mathematical proofs and computations,
we investigate circuit complexity from the perspective of logic.
Among other results, we prove that for any parameter it is
consistent with theory that computational class , where is one of
the pairs: and , and , and
. In other words, these theories cannot establish
infinitely often circuit upper bounds for the corresponding problems. This is
of interest because the weaker theory already formalizes
sophisticated arguments, such as a proof of the PCP Theorem. These consistency
statements are unconditional and improve on earlier theorems of [KO17] and
[BM18] on the consistency of lower bounds with
An average-case depth hierarchy theorem for Boolean circuits
We prove an average-case depth hierarchy theorem for Boolean circuits over
the standard basis of , , and gates.
Our hierarchy theorem says that for every , there is an explicit
-variable Boolean function , computed by a linear-size depth- formula,
which is such that any depth- circuit that agrees with on fraction of all inputs must have size This
answers an open question posed by H{\aa}stad in his Ph.D. thesis.
Our average-case depth hierarchy theorem implies that the polynomial
hierarchy is infinite relative to a random oracle with probability 1,
confirming a conjecture of H{\aa}stad, Cai, and Babai. We also use our result
to show that there is no "approximate converse" to the results of Linial,
Mansour, Nisan and Boppana on the total influence of small-depth circuits, thus
answering a question posed by O'Donnell, Kalai, and Hatami.
A key ingredient in our proof is a notion of \emph{random projections} which
generalize random restrictions
A Casual Tour Around a Circuit Complexity Bound
I will discuss the recent proof that the complexity class NEXP
(nondeterministic exponential time) lacks nonuniform ACC circuits of polynomial
size. The proof will be described from the perspective of someone trying to
discover it.Comment: 21 pages, 2 figures. An earlier version appeared in SIGACT News,
September 201
Shallow Circuits with High-Powered Inputs
A polynomial identity testing algorithm must determine whether an input
polynomial (given for instance by an arithmetic circuit) is identically equal
to 0. In this paper, we show that a deterministic black-box identity testing
algorithm for (high-degree) univariate polynomials would imply a lower bound on
the arithmetic complexity of the permanent. The lower bounds that are known to
follow from derandomization of (low-degree) multivariate identity testing are
weaker. To obtain our lower bound it would be sufficient to derandomize
identity testing for polynomials of a very specific norm: sums of products of
sparse polynomials with sparse coefficients. This observation leads to new
versions of the Shub-Smale tau-conjecture on integer roots of univariate
polynomials. In particular, we show that a lower bound for the permanent would
follow if one could give a good enough bound on the number of real roots of
sums of products of sparse polynomials (Descartes' rule of signs gives such a
bound for sparse polynomials and products thereof). In this third version of
our paper we show that the same lower bound would follow even if one could only
prove a slightly superpolynomial upper bound on the number of real roots. This
is a consequence of a new result on reduction to depth 4 for arithmetic
circuits which we establish in a companion paper. We also show that an even
weaker bound on the number of real roots would suffice to obtain a lower bound
on the size of depth 4 circuits computing the permanent.Comment: A few typos correcte
On Computing Multilinear Polynomials Using Multi-r-ic Depth Four Circuits
International audienceIn this paper, we are interested in understanding the complexity of computing multilinear polynomials using depth four circuits in which polynomial computed at every node has a bound on the individual degree of r (referred to as multi-r-ic circuits). The goal of this study is to make progress towards proving superpolynomial lower bounds for general depth four circuits computing multilinear polynomials, by proving better and better bounds as the value of r increases. Recently, Kayal, Saha and Tavenas (Theory of Computing, 2018) showed that any depth four arithmetic circuit of bounded individual degree r computing a multilinear polynomial on n^O(1) variables and degree d = o(n), must have size at least (n/r^1.1)^{\sqrt{d/r}} when r is o(d) and is strictly less than n^1/1.1. This bound however deteriorates with increasing r. It is a natural question to ask if we can prove a bound that does not deteriorate with increasing r or a bound that holds for a larger regime of r. We here prove a lower bound which does not deteriorate with r , however for a specific instance of d = d (n) but for a wider range of r. Formally, we show that there exists an explicit polynomial on n^{O(1)} variables and degree Θ(log^2(n)) such that any depth four circuit of bounded individual degree r < n^0.2 must have size at least exp(Ω (log^2 n)). This improvement is obtained by suitably adapting the complexity measure of Kayal et al. (Theory of Computing, 2018). This adaptation of the measure is inspired by the complexity measure used by Kayal et al. (SIAM J. Computing, 2017)
- …