13,187 research outputs found
Algorithms for group isomorphism via group extensions and cohomology
The isomorphism problem for finite groups of order n (GpI) has long been
known to be solvable in time, but only recently were
polynomial-time algorithms designed for several interesting group classes.
Inspired by recent progress, we revisit the strategy for GpI via the extension
theory of groups.
The extension theory describes how a normal subgroup N is related to G/N via
G, and this naturally leads to a divide-and-conquer strategy that splits GpI
into two subproblems: one regarding group actions on other groups, and one
regarding group cohomology. When the normal subgroup N is abelian, this
strategy is well-known. Our first contribution is to extend this strategy to
handle the case when N is not necessarily abelian. This allows us to provide a
unified explanation of all recent polynomial-time algorithms for special group
classes.
Guided by this strategy, to make further progress on GpI, we consider
central-radical groups, proposed in Babai et al. (SODA 2011): the class of
groups such that G mod its center has no abelian normal subgroups. This class
is a natural extension of the group class considered by Babai et al. (ICALP
2012), namely those groups with no abelian normal subgroups. Following the
above strategy, we solve GpI in time for central-radical
groups, and in polynomial time for several prominent subclasses of
central-radical groups. We also solve GpI in time for
groups whose solvable normal subgroups are elementary abelian but not
necessarily central. As far as we are aware, this is the first time there have
been worst-case guarantees on a -time algorithm that tackles
both aspects of GpI---actions and cohomology---simultaneously.Comment: 54 pages + 14-page appendix. Significantly improved presentation,
with some new result
Binary matroids and local complementation
We introduce a binary matroid M(IAS(G)) associated with a looped simple graph
G. M(IAS(G)) classifies G up to local equivalence, and determines the
delta-matroid and isotropic system associated with G. Moreover, a parametrized
form of its Tutte polynomial yields the interlace polynomials of G.Comment: This article supersedes arXiv:1301.0293. v2: 26 pages, 2 figures. v3
- v5: 31 pages, 2 figures v6: Final prepublication versio
An Intuitionistic Formula Hierarchy Based on High-School Identities
We revisit the notion of intuitionistic equivalence and formal proof
representations by adopting the view of formulas as exponential polynomials.
After observing that most of the invertible proof rules of intuitionistic
(minimal) propositional sequent calculi are formula (i.e. sequent) isomorphisms
corresponding to the high-school identities, we show that one can obtain a more
compact variant of a proof system, consisting of non-invertible proof rules
only, and where the invertible proof rules have been replaced by a formula
normalisation procedure.
Moreover, for certain proof systems such as the G4ip sequent calculus of
Vorob'ev, Hudelmaier, and Dyckhoff, it is even possible to see all of the
non-invertible proof rules as strict inequalities between exponential
polynomials; a careful combinatorial treatment is given in order to establish
this fact.
Finally, we extend the exponential polynomial analogy to the first-order
quantifiers, showing that it gives rise to an intuitionistic hierarchy of
formulas, resembling the classical arithmetical hierarchy, and the first one
that classifies formulas while preserving isomorphism
Axioms and Decidability for Type Isomorphism in the Presence of Sums
We consider the problem of characterizing isomorphisms of types, or,
equivalently, constructive cardinality of sets, in the simultaneous presence of
disjoint unions, Cartesian products, and exponentials. Mostly relying on
results about polynomials with exponentiation that have not been used in our
context, we derive: that the usual finite axiomatization known as High-School
Identities (HSI) is complete for a significant subclass of types; that it is
decidable for that subclass when two types are isomorphic; that, for the whole
of the set of types, a recursive extension of the axioms of HSI exists that is
complete; and that, for the whole of the set of types, the question as to
whether two types are isomorphic is decidable when base types are to be
interpreted as finite sets. We also point out certain related open problems
- …