1,966 research outputs found
Optimal 3D Angular Resolution for Low-Degree Graphs
We show that every graph of maximum degree three can be drawn in three
dimensions with at most two bends per edge, and with 120-degree angles between
any two edge segments meeting at a vertex or a bend. We show that every graph
of maximum degree four can be drawn in three dimensions with at most three
bends per edge, and with 109.5-degree angles, i.e., the angular resolution of
the diamond lattice, between any two edge segments meeting at a vertex or bend.Comment: 18 pages, 10 figures. Extended version of paper to appear in Proc.
18th Int. Symp. Graph Drawing, Konstanz, Germany, 201
Relating Graph Thickness to Planar Layers and Bend Complexity
The thickness of a graph with vertices is the minimum number of
planar subgraphs of whose union is . A polyline drawing of in
is a drawing of , where each vertex is mapped to a
point and each edge is mapped to a polygonal chain. Bend and layer complexities
are two important aesthetics of such a drawing. The bend complexity of
is the maximum number of bends per edge in , and the layer complexity
of is the minimum integer such that the set of polygonal chains in
can be partitioned into disjoint sets, where each set corresponds
to a planar polyline drawing. Let be a graph of thickness . By
F\'{a}ry's theorem, if , then can be drawn on a single layer with bend
complexity . A few extensions to higher thickness are known, e.g., if
(resp., ), then can be drawn on layers with bend complexity 2
(resp., ). However, allowing a higher number of layers may reduce the
bend complexity, e.g., complete graphs require layers to be drawn
using 0 bends per edge.
In this paper we present an elegant extension of F\'{a}ry's theorem to draw
graphs of thickness . We first prove that thickness- graphs can be
drawn on layers with bends per edge. We then develop another
technique to draw thickness- graphs on layers with bend complexity,
i.e., , where . Previously, the bend complexity was not known to be sublinear for
. Finally, we show that graphs with linear arboricity can be drawn on
layers with bend complexity .Comment: A preliminary version appeared at the 43rd International Colloquium
on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2016
Planar L-Drawings of Directed Graphs
We study planar drawings of directed graphs in the L-drawing standard. We
provide necessary conditions for the existence of these drawings and show that
testing for the existence of a planar L-drawing is an NP-complete problem.
Motivated by this result, we focus on upward-planar L-drawings. We show that
directed st-graphs admitting an upward- (resp. upward-rightward-) planar
L-drawing are exactly those admitting a bitonic (resp. monotonically
increasing) st-ordering. We give a linear-time algorithm that computes a
bitonic (resp. monotonically increasing) st-ordering of a planar st-graph or
reports that there exists none.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017
On Smooth Orthogonal and Octilinear Drawings: Relations, Complexity and Kandinsky Drawings
We study two variants of the well-known orthogonal drawing model: (i) the
smooth orthogonal, and (ii) the octilinear. Both models form an extension of
the orthogonal, by supporting one additional type of edge segments (circular
arcs and diagonal segments, respectively).
For planar graphs of max-degree 4, we analyze relationships between the graph
classes that can be drawn bendless in the two models and we also prove
NP-hardness for a restricted version of the bendless drawing problem for both
models. For planar graphs of higher degree, we present an algorithm that
produces bi-monotone smooth orthogonal drawings with at most two segments per
edge, which also guarantees a linear number of edges with exactly one segment.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017
- âŠ