Observing the Evolution of QUIC Implementations

The QUIC protocol combines features that were initially found inside the TCP, TLS and HTTP/2 protocols. The IETF is currently finalising a complete specification of this protocol. More than a dozen of independent implementations have been developed in parallel with these standardisation activities. We propose and implement a QUIC test suite that interacts with public QUIC servers to verify their conformance with key features of the IETF specification. Our measurements, gathered over a semester, provide a unique viewpoint on the evolution of a protocol and of its implementations. They highlight the arrival of new features and some regressions among the different implementations.Comment: 6 pages, 8 figure

Reducing the acknowledgement frequency in IETF QUIC

Research Funding European Space Agency University of AberdeenPeer reviewedPublisher PD

QUIC on the Highway: Evaluating Performance on High-rate Links

QUIC is a new protocol standardized in 2021 designed to improve on the widely used TCP / TLS stack. The main goal is to speed up web traffic via HTTP, but it is also used in other areas like tunneling. Based on UDP it offers features like reliable in-order delivery, flow and congestion control, streambased multiplexing, and always-on encryption using TLS 1.3. Other than with TCP, QUIC implements all these features in user space, only requiring kernel interaction for UDP. While running in user space provides more flexibility, it profits less from efficiency and optimization within the kernel. Multiple implementations exist, differing in programming language, architecture, and design choices. This paper presents an extension to the QUIC Interop Runner, a framework for testing interoperability of QUIC implementations. Our contribution enables reproducible QUIC benchmarks on dedicated hardware. We provide baseline results on 10G links, including multiple implementations, evaluate how OS features like buffer sizes and NIC offloading impact QUIC performance, and show which data rates can be achieved with QUIC compared to TCP. Our results show that QUIC performance varies widely between client and server implementations from 90 Mbit/s to 4900 Mbit/s. We show that the OS generally sets the default buffer size too small, which should be increased by at least an order of magnitude based on our findings. Furthermore, QUIC benefits less from NIC offloading and AES NI hardware acceleration while both features improve the goodput of TCP to around 8000 Mbit/s. Our framework can be applied to evaluate the effects of future improvements to the protocol or the OS.Comment: Presented at the 2023 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking

Multiple transport protocols in an adaptive RPC-based framework

The growing demand for distributed systems running in many environments and built atop heterogeneous transport protocols is apparent. However, existing middleware solutions commonly are built atop a unique protocol like TCP. This paper extends an existing framework for building middleware systems by adding several communications protocols. The proposed extensions allow developers to implement a middleware using distinct communication protocols (e.g., UDP, HTTP) or even replace them at runtime. An experimental evaluation was conducted (1) to show the impact of the new extensions on the application's performance and (2) to compare the performance of the proposed extensions with existing commercial middleware systems

Dynamical Generation of Noiseless Quantum Subsystems

We present control schemes for open quantum systems that combine decoupling and universal control methods with coding procedures. By exploiting a general algebraic approach, we show how appropriate encodings of quantum states result in obtaining universal control over dynamically-generated noise-protected subsystems with limited control resources. In particular, we provide an efficient scheme for performing universal encoded quantum computation in a wide class of systems subjected to linear non-Markovian quantum noise and supporting Heisenberg-type internal Hamiltonians.Comment: 4 pages, no figures; REVTeX styl