1,331 research outputs found
A Logic with Reverse Modalities for History-preserving Bisimulations
We introduce event identifier logic (EIL) which extends Hennessy-Milner logic
by the addition of (1) reverse as well as forward modalities, and (2)
identifiers to keep track of events. We show that this logic corresponds to
hereditary history-preserving (HH) bisimulation equivalence within a particular
true-concurrency model, namely stable configuration structures. We furthermore
show how natural sublogics of EIL correspond to coarser equivalences. In
particular we provide logical characterisations of weak history-preserving (WH)
and history-preserving (H) bisimulation. Logics corresponding to HH and H
bisimulation have been given previously, but not to WH bisimulation (when
autoconcurrency is allowed), as far as we are aware. We also present
characteristic formulas which characterise individual structures with respect
to history-preserving equivalences.Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS 2011, arXiv:1108.407
TAPAs: A Tool for the Analysis of Process Algebras
Process algebras are formalisms for modelling concurrent systems that permit mathematical reasoning with respect to a set of desired properties. TAPAs is a tool that can be used to support the use of process algebras to specify and analyze concurrent systems. It does not aim at guaranteeing high performances, but has been developed as a support to teaching. Systems are described as process algebras terms that are then mapped to labelled transition systems (LTSs). Properties are verified either by checking equivalence of concrete and abstract systems descriptions, or by model checking temporal formulae over the obtained LTS. A key feature of TAPAs, that makes it particularly suitable for teaching, is that it maintains a consistent double representation of each system both as a term and as a graph. Another useful didactical feature is the exhibition of counterexamples in case equivalences are not verified or the proposed formulae are not satisfied
CCS Dynamic Bisimulation is Progressing
Weak Observational Congruence (woc) defined on CCS agents is not a bisimulation since it does not require two states reached by bisimilar computations of woc agents to be still woc, e.g.\ and are woc but and are not. This fact prevents us from characterizing CCS semantics (when is considered invisible) as a final algebra, since the semantic function would induce an equivalence over the agents that is both a congruence and a bisimulation. In the paper we introduce a new behavioural equivalence for CCS agents, which is the coarsest among those bisimulations which are also congruences. We call it Dynamic Observational Congruence because it expresses a natural notion of equivalence for concurrent systems required to simulate each other in the presence of dynamic, i.e.\ run time, (re)configurations. We provide an algebraic characterization of Dynamic Congruence in terms of a universal property of finality. Furthermore we introduce Progressing Bisimulation, which forces processes to simulate each other performing explicit steps. We provide an algebraic characterization of it in terms of finality, two characterizations via modal logic in the style of HML, and a complete axiomatization for finite agents. Finally, we prove that Dynamic Congruence and Progressing Bisimulation coincide for CCS agents. Thus the title of the paper
A Logic for True Concurrency
We propose a logic for true concurrency whose formulae predicate about events
in computations and their causal dependencies. The induced logical equivalence
is hereditary history preserving bisimilarity, and fragments of the logic can
be identified which correspond to other true concurrent behavioural
equivalences in the literature: step, pomset and history preserving
bisimilarity. Standard Hennessy-Milner logic, and thus (interleaving)
bisimilarity, is also recovered as a fragment. We also propose an extension of
the logic with fixpoint operators, thus allowing to describe causal and
concurrency properties of infinite computations. We believe that this work
contributes to a rational presentation of the true concurrent spectrum and to a
deeper understanding of the relations between the involved behavioural
equivalences.Comment: 31 pages, a preliminary version appeared in CONCUR 201
Process Algebras
Process Algebras are mathematically rigorous languages with well defined semantics that permit describing and verifying properties of concurrent communicating systems.
They can be seen as models of processes, regarded as agents that act and interact continuously with other similar agents and with their common environment. The agents may be real-world objects (even people), or they may be artifacts, embodied perhaps in computer hardware or software systems.
Many different approaches (operational, denotational, algebraic) are taken for describing the meaning of processes. However, the operational approach is the reference one. By relying on the so called Structural Operational Semantics (SOS), labelled transition systems are built and composed by using the different operators of the many different process algebras. Behavioral equivalences are used to abstract from unwanted details and identify those systems that react similarly to external
experiments
Dynamic Congruence vs. Progressing Bisimulation for CCS
Weak Observational Congruence (woc) defined on CCS agents is not a bisimulation since it does not require two states reached by bisimilar computations of woc agents to be still woc, e.g. \alpha.\tau.\beta.nil and \alpha.\beta.nil are woc but \tau.\beta.nil and \beta.nil are not. This fact prevent us from characterizing CCS semantics (when \tau is considered invisible) as a final algebra, since the semantic function would induce an equivalence over the agents that is both a congruence and a bisimulation. In the paper we introduce a new behavioural equivalence for CCS agents, which is the coarsest among those bisimulations which are also congruences. We call it Dynamic Observational Congruence because it expresses a natural notion of equivalence for concurrent systems required to simulate each other in the presence of dynamic, i.e. run time, (re)configurations. We provide an algebraic characterization of Dynamic Congruence in terms of a universal property of finality. Furthermore we introduce Progressing Bisimulation, which forces processes to simulate each other performing explicit steps. We provide an algebraic characterization of it in terms of finality, two logical characterizations via modal logic in the style of HML and a complete axiomatization for finite agents (consisting of the axioms for Strong Observational Congruence and of two of the three Milner's -laws). Finally, we prove that Dynamic Congruence and Progressing Bisimulation coincide for CCS agents
Reverse Bisimulations on Stable Configuration Structures
The relationships between various equivalences on configuration structures,
including interleaving bisimulation (IB), step bisimulation (SB) and hereditary
history-preserving (HH) bisimulation, have been investigated by van Glabbeek
and Goltz (and later Fecher). Since HH bisimulation may be characterised by the
use of reverse as well as forward transitions, it is of interest to investigate
forms of IB and SB where both forward and reverse transitions are allowed. We
give various characterisations of reverse SB, showing that forward steps do not
add extra power. We strengthen Bednarczyk's result that, in the absence of
auto-concurrency, reverse IB is as strong as HH bisimulation, by showing that
we need only exclude auto-concurrent events at the same depth in the
configuration
The Role of Deontic Logic in the Specification of Information Systems
In this paper we discuss the role that deontic logic plays in the specification of information systems, either because constraints on the systems directly concern norms or, and even more importantly, system constraints are considered ideal but violable (so-called `soft¿ constraints).\ud
To overcome the traditional problems with deontic logic (the so-called paradoxes), we first state the importance of distinguishing between ought-to-be and ought-to-do constraints and next focus on the most severe paradox, the so-called Chisholm paradox, involving contrary-to-duty norms. We present a multi-modal extension of standard deontic logic (SDL) to represent the ought-to-be version of the Chisholm set properly. For the ought-to-do variant we employ a reduction to dynamic logic, and show how the Chisholm set can be treated adequately in this setting. Finally we discuss a way of integrating both ought-to-be and ought-to-do reasoning, enabling one to draw conclusions from ought-to-be constraints to ought-to-do ones, and show by an example the use(fulness) of this
- …