212 research outputs found

    ์ดˆ์  ์Šคํƒ์—์„œ 3D ๊นŠ์ด ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊นŠ์ด ๊ฐœ์„ 

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021. 2. ์‹ ์˜๊ธธ.Three-dimensional (3D) depth recovery from two-dimensional images is a fundamental and challenging objective in computer vision, and is one of the most important prerequisites for many applications such as 3D measurement, robot location and navigation, self-driving, and so on. Depth-from-focus (DFF) is one of the important methods to reconstruct a 3D depth in the use of focus information. Reconstructing a 3D depth from texture-less regions is a typical issue associated with the conventional DFF. Further more, it is difficult for the conventional DFF reconstruction techniques to preserve depth edges and fine details while maintaining spatial consistency. In this dissertation, we address these problems and propose an DFF depth recovery framework which is robust over texture-less regions, and can reconstruct a depth image with clear edges and fine details. The depth recovery framework proposed in this dissertation is composed of two processes: depth reconstruction and depth refinement. To recovery an accurate 3D depth, We first formulate the depth reconstruction as a maximum a posterior (MAP) estimation problem with the inclusion of matting Laplacian prior. The nonlocal principle is adopted during the construction stage of the matting Laplacian matrix to preserve depth edges and fine details. Additionally, a depth variance based confidence measure with the combination of the reliability measure of focus measure is proposed to maintain the spatial smoothness, such that the smooth depth regions in initial depth could have high confidence value and the reconstructed depth could be more derived from the initial depth. As the nonlocal principle breaks the spatial consistency, the reconstructed depth image is spatially inconsistent. Meanwhile, it suffers from texture-copy artifacts. To smooth the noise and suppress the texture-copy artifacts introduced in the reconstructed depth image, we propose a closed-form edge-preserving depth refinement algorithm that formulates the depth refinement as a MAP estimation problem using Markov random fields (MRFs). With the incorporation of pre-estimated depth edges and mutual structure information into our energy function and the specially designed smoothness weight, the proposed refinement method can effectively suppress noise and texture-copy artifacts while preserving depth edges. Additionally, with the construction of undirected weighted graph representing the energy function, a closed-form solution is obtained by using the Laplacian matrix corresponding to the graph. The proposed framework presents a novel method of 3D depth recovery from a focal stack. The proposed algorithm shows the superiority in depth recovery over texture-less regions owing to the effective variance based confidence level computation and the matting Laplacian prior. Additionally, this proposed reconstruction method can obtain a depth image with clear edges and fine details due to the adoption of nonlocal principle in the construct]ion of matting Laplacian matrix. The proposed closed-form depth refinement approach shows that the ability in noise removal while preserving object structure with the usage of common edges. Additionally, it is able to effectively suppress texture-copy artifacts by utilizing mutual structure information. The proposed depth refinement provides a general idea for edge-preserving image smoothing, especially for depth related refinement such as stereo vision. Both quantitative and qualitative experimental results show the supremacy of the proposed method in terms of robustness in texture-less regions, accuracy, and ability to preserve object structure while maintaining spatial smoothness.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.3 Contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.4 Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Chapter 2 Related Works 9 2.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2 Principle of depth-from-focus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2.1 Focus measure operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.3 Depth-from-focus reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.4 Edge-preserving image denoising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Chapter 3 Depth-from-Focus Reconstruction using Nonlocal Matting Laplacian Prior 38 3.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.2 Image matting and matting Laplacian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3.3 Depth-from-focus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.4 Depth reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.4.1 Problem statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.4.2 Likelihood model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.4.3 Nonlocal matting Laplacian prior model . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.5 Experimental results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.5.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.5.2 Data configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.5.3 Reconstruction results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 3.5.4 Comparison between reconstruction using local and nonlocal matting Laplacian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 3.5.5 Spatial consistency analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.5.6 Parameter setting and analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Chapter 4 Closed-form MRF-based Depth Refinement 63 4.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 4.2 Problem statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 4.3 Closed-form solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4.4 Edge preservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 4.5 Texture-copy artifacts suppression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 4.6 Experimental results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 4.7 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Chapter 5 Evaluation 82 5.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 5.2 Evaluation metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.3 Evaluation on synthetic datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.4 Evaluation on real scene datasets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.5 Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 5.6 Computational performances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 Chapter 6 Conclusion 96 Bibliography 99Docto

    Natural Image Matting via Guided Contextual Attention

    Full text link
    Over the last few years, deep learning based approaches have achieved outstanding improvements in natural image matting. Many of these methods can generate visually plausible alpha estimations, but typically yield blurry structures or textures in the semitransparent area. This is due to the local ambiguity of transparent objects. One possible solution is to leverage the far-surrounding information to estimate the local opacity. Traditional affinity-based methods often suffer from the high computational complexity, which are not suitable for high resolution alpha estimation. Inspired by affinity-based method and the successes of contextual attention in inpainting, we develop a novel end-to-end approach for natural image matting with a guided contextual attention module, which is specifically designed for image matting. Guided contextual attention module directly propagates high-level opacity information globally based on the learned low-level affinity. The proposed method can mimic information flow of affinity-based methods and utilize rich features learned by deep neural networks simultaneously. Experiment results on Composition-1k testing set and alphamatting.com benchmark dataset demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in natural image matting. Code and models are available at https://github.com/Yaoyi-Li/GCA-Matting.Comment: AAAI-2

    Edge-enhancing Filters with Negative Weights

    Full text link
    In [DOI:10.1109/ICMEW.2014.6890711], a graph-based denoising is performed by projecting the noisy image to a lower dimensional Krylov subspace of the graph Laplacian, constructed using nonnegative weights determined by distances between image data corresponding to image pixels. We~extend the construction of the graph Laplacian to the case, where some graph weights can be negative. Removing the positivity constraint provides a more accurate inference of a graph model behind the data, and thus can improve quality of filters for graph-based signal processing, e.g., denoising, compared to the standard construction, without affecting the costs.Comment: 5 pages; 6 figures. Accepted to IEEE GlobalSIP 2015 conferenc
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore