158 research outputs found
Multi-Head Finite Automata: Characterizations, Concepts and Open Problems
Multi-head finite automata were introduced in (Rabin, 1964) and (Rosenberg,
1966). Since that time, a vast literature on computational and descriptional
complexity issues on multi-head finite automata documenting the importance of
these devices has been developed. Although multi-head finite automata are a
simple concept, their computational behavior can be already very complex and
leads to undecidable or even non-semi-decidable problems on these devices such
as, for example, emptiness, finiteness, universality, equivalence, etc. These
strong negative results trigger the study of subclasses and alternative
characterizations of multi-head finite automata for a better understanding of
the nature of non-recursive trade-offs and, thus, the borderline between
decidable and undecidable problems. In the present paper, we tour a fragment of
this literature
From Finite Automata to Regular Expressions and Back--A Summary on Descriptional Complexity
The equivalence of finite automata and regular expressions dates back to the
seminal paper of Kleene on events in nerve nets and finite automata from 1956.
In the present paper we tour a fragment of the literature and summarize results
on upper and lower bounds on the conversion of finite automata to regular
expressions and vice versa. We also briefly recall the known bounds for the
removal of spontaneous transitions (epsilon-transitions) on non-epsilon-free
nondeterministic devices. Moreover, we report on recent results on the average
case descriptional complexity bounds for the conversion of regular expressions
to finite automata and brand new developments on the state elimination
algorithm that converts finite automata to regular expressions.Comment: In Proceedings AFL 2014, arXiv:1405.527
The Magic Number Problem for Subregular Language Families
We investigate the magic number problem, that is, the question whether there
exists a minimal n-state nondeterministic finite automaton (NFA) whose
equivalent minimal deterministic finite automaton (DFA) has alpha states, for
all n and alpha satisfying n less or equal to alpha less or equal to exp(2,n).
A number alpha not satisfying this condition is called a magic number (for n).
It was shown in [11] that no magic numbers exist for general regular languages,
while in [5] trivial and non-trivial magic numbers for unary regular languages
were identified. We obtain similar results for automata accepting subregular
languages like, for example, combinational languages, star-free, prefix-,
suffix-, and infix-closed languages, and prefix-, suffix-, and infix-free
languages, showing that there are only trivial magic numbers, when they exist.
For finite languages we obtain some partial results showing that certain
numbers are non-magic.Comment: In Proceedings DCFS 2010, arXiv:1008.127
Transformations Between Different Types of Unranked Bottom-Up Tree Automata
We consider the representational state complexity of unranked tree automata.
The bottom-up computation of an unranked tree automaton may be either
deterministic or nondeterministic, and further variants arise depending on
whether the horizontal string languages defining the transitions are
represented by a DFA or an NFA. Also, we consider for unranked tree automata
the alternative syntactic definition of determinism introduced by Cristau et
al. (FCT'05, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3623, pp. 68-79).
We establish upper and lower bounds for the state complexity of conversions
between different types of unranked tree automata.Comment: In Proceedings DCFS 2010, arXiv:1008.127
Descriptional Complexity of Finite Automata -- Selected Highlights
The state complexity, respectively, nondeterministic state complexity of a
regular language is the number of states of the minimal deterministic,
respectively, of a minimal nondeterministic finite automaton for . Some of
the most studied state complexity questions deal with size comparisons of
nondeterministic finite automata of differing degree of ambiguity. More
generally, if for a regular language we compare the size of description by a
finite automaton and by a more powerful language definition mechanism, such as
a context-free grammar, we encounter non-recursive trade-offs. Operational
state complexity studies the state complexity of the language resulting from a
regularity preserving operation as a function of the complexity of the argument
languages. Determining the state complexity of combined operations is generally
challenging and for general combinations of operations that include
intersection and marked concatenation it is uncomputable
Operational State Complexity of Deterministic Unranked Tree Automata
We consider the state complexity of basic operations on tree languages
recognized by deterministic unranked tree automata. For the operations of union
and intersection the upper and lower bounds of both weakly and strongly
deterministic tree automata are obtained. For tree concatenation we establish a
tight upper bound that is of a different order than the known state complexity
of concatenation of regular string languages. We show that (n+1) (
(m+1)2^n-2^(n-1) )-1 vertical states are sufficient, and necessary in the worst
case, to recognize the concatenation of tree languages recognized by (strongly
or weakly) deterministic automata with, respectively, m and n vertical states.Comment: In Proceedings DCFS 2010, arXiv:1008.127
Unary Pushdown Automata and Straight-Line Programs
We consider decision problems for deterministic pushdown automata over a
unary alphabet (udpda, for short). Udpda are a simple computation model that
accept exactly the unary regular languages, but can be exponentially more
succinct than finite-state automata. We complete the complexity landscape for
udpda by showing that emptiness (and thus universality) is P-hard, equivalence
and compressed membership problems are P-complete, and inclusion is
coNP-complete. Our upper bounds are based on a translation theorem between
udpda and straight-line programs over the binary alphabet (SLPs). We show that
the characteristic sequence of any udpda can be represented as a pair of
SLPs---one for the prefix, one for the lasso---that have size linear in the
size of the udpda and can be computed in polynomial time. Hence, decision
problems on udpda are reduced to decision problems on SLPs. Conversely, any SLP
can be converted in logarithmic space into a udpda, and this forms the basis
for our lower bound proofs. We show coNP-hardness of the ordered matching
problem for SLPs, from which we derive coNP-hardness for inclusion. In
addition, we complete the complexity landscape for unary nondeterministic
pushdown automata by showing that the universality problem is -hard, using a new class of integer expressions. Our techniques have
applications beyond udpda. We show that our results imply -completeness for a natural fragment of Presburger arithmetic and coNP lower
bounds for compressed matching problems with one-character wildcards
Transition Complexity of Incomplete DFAs
In this paper, we consider the transition complexity of regular languages
based on the incomplete deterministic finite automata. A number of results on
Boolean operations have been obtained. It is shown that the transition
complexity results for union and complementation are very different from the
state complexity results for the same operations. However, for intersection,
the transition complexity result is similar to that of state complexity.Comment: In Proceedings DCFS 2010, arXiv:1008.127
- …