20,724 research outputs found
Optimal Parameter Choices Through Self-Adjustment: Applying the 1/5-th Rule in Discrete Settings
While evolutionary algorithms are known to be very successful for a broad
range of applications, the algorithm designer is often left with many
algorithmic choices, for example, the size of the population, the mutation
rates, and the crossover rates of the algorithm. These parameters are known to
have a crucial influence on the optimization time, and thus need to be chosen
carefully, a task that often requires substantial efforts. Moreover, the
optimal parameters can change during the optimization process. It is therefore
of great interest to design mechanisms that dynamically choose best-possible
parameters. An example for such an update mechanism is the one-fifth success
rule for step-size adaption in evolutionary strategies. While in continuous
domains this principle is well understood also from a mathematical point of
view, no comparable theory is available for problems in discrete domains.
In this work we show that the one-fifth success rule can be effective also in
discrete settings. We regard the ~GA proposed in
[Doerr/Doerr/Ebel: From black-box complexity to designing new genetic
algorithms, TCS 2015]. We prove that if its population size is chosen according
to the one-fifth success rule then the expected optimization time on
\textsc{OneMax} is linear. This is better than what \emph{any} static
population size can achieve and is asymptotically optimal also among
all adaptive parameter choices.Comment: This is the full version of a paper that is to appear at GECCO 201
Towards a Theory-Guided Benchmarking Suite for Discrete Black-Box Optimization Heuristics: Profiling EA Variants on OneMax and LeadingOnes
Theoretical and empirical research on evolutionary computation methods
complement each other by providing two fundamentally different approaches
towards a better understanding of black-box optimization heuristics. In
discrete optimization, both streams developed rather independently of each
other, but we observe today an increasing interest in reconciling these two
sub-branches. In continuous optimization, the COCO (COmparing Continuous
Optimisers) benchmarking suite has established itself as an important platform
that theoreticians and practitioners use to exchange research ideas and
questions. No widely accepted equivalent exists in the research domain of
discrete black-box optimization.
Marking an important step towards filling this gap, we adjust the COCO
software to pseudo-Boolean optimization problems, and obtain from this a
benchmarking environment that allows a fine-grained empirical analysis of
discrete black-box heuristics. In this documentation we demonstrate how this
test bed can be used to profile the performance of evolutionary algorithms.
More concretely, we study the optimization behavior of several EA
variants on the two benchmark problems OneMax and LeadingOnes. This comparison
motivates a refined analysis for the optimization time of the EA
on LeadingOnes
Runtime Analysis for Self-adaptive Mutation Rates
We propose and analyze a self-adaptive version of the
evolutionary algorithm in which the current mutation rate is part of the
individual and thus also subject to mutation. A rigorous runtime analysis on
the OneMax benchmark function reveals that a simple local mutation scheme for
the rate leads to an expected optimization time (number of fitness evaluations)
of when is at least for
some constant . For all values of , this
performance is asymptotically best possible among all -parallel
mutation-based unbiased black-box algorithms.
Our result shows that self-adaptation in evolutionary computation can find
complex optimal parameter settings on the fly. At the same time, it proves that
a relatively complicated self-adjusting scheme for the mutation rate proposed
by Doerr, Gie{\ss}en, Witt, and Yang~(GECCO~2017) can be replaced by our simple
endogenous scheme.
On the technical side, the paper contributes new tools for the analysis of
two-dimensional drift processes arising in the analysis of dynamic parameter
choices in EAs, including bounds on occupation probabilities in processes with
non-constant drift
Adaptive Evolutionary Clustering
In many practical applications of clustering, the objects to be clustered
evolve over time, and a clustering result is desired at each time step. In such
applications, evolutionary clustering typically outperforms traditional static
clustering by producing clustering results that reflect long-term trends while
being robust to short-term variations. Several evolutionary clustering
algorithms have recently been proposed, often by adding a temporal smoothness
penalty to the cost function of a static clustering method. In this paper, we
introduce a different approach to evolutionary clustering by accurately
tracking the time-varying proximities between objects followed by static
clustering. We present an evolutionary clustering framework that adaptively
estimates the optimal smoothing parameter using shrinkage estimation, a
statistical approach that improves a naive estimate using additional
information. The proposed framework can be used to extend a variety of static
clustering algorithms, including hierarchical, k-means, and spectral
clustering, into evolutionary clustering algorithms. Experiments on synthetic
and real data sets indicate that the proposed framework outperforms static
clustering and existing evolutionary clustering algorithms in many scenarios.Comment: To appear in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, MATLAB toolbox
available at http://tbayes.eecs.umich.edu/xukevin/affec
Comparison of Geometric Optimization Methods with Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms for Solving Integrated Optimal Design Problems
In this paper, system design methodologies for optimizing heterogenous power devices in electrical engineering are investigated. The concept of Integrated Optimal Design (IOD) is presented and a simplified but typical example is given. It consists in finding Pareto-optimal configurations for the motor drive of an electric vehicle. For that purpose, a geometric optimization method (i.e the Hooke and Jeeves minimization procedure) associated with an objective weighting sum and a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm (i.e. the NSGA-II) are compared. Several performance issues are discussed such as the accuracy in the determination of Pareto-optimal configurations and the capability to well spread these solutions in the objective space
Online Selection of CMA-ES Variants
In the field of evolutionary computation, one of the most challenging topics
is algorithm selection. Knowing which heuristics to use for which optimization
problem is key to obtaining high-quality solutions. We aim to extend this
research topic by taking a first step towards a selection method for adaptive
CMA-ES algorithms. We build upon the theoretical work done by van Rijn
\textit{et al.} [PPSN'18], in which the potential of switching between
different CMA-ES variants was quantified in the context of a modular CMA-ES
framework.
We demonstrate in this work that their proposed approach is not very
reliable, in that implementing the suggested adaptive configurations does not
yield the predicted performance gains. We propose a revised approach, which
results in a more robust fit between predicted and actual performance. The
adaptive CMA-ES approach obtains performance gains on 18 out of 24 tested
functions of the BBOB benchmark, with stable advantages of up to 23\%. An
analysis of module activation indicates which modules are most crucial for the
different phases of optimizing each of the 24 benchmark problems. The module
activation also suggests that additional gains are possible when including the
(B)IPOP modules, which we have excluded for this present work.Comment: To appear at Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
(GECCO'19) Appendix will be added in due tim
- …