(Almost) Ruling Out SETH Lower Bounds for All-Pairs Max-Flow

The All-Pairs Max-Flow problem has gained significant popularity in the last two decades, and many results are known regarding its fine-grained complexity. Despite this, wide gaps remain in our understanding of the time complexity for several basic variants of the problem. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by providing algorithms, conditional lower bounds, and non-reducibility results. Our main result is that for most problem settings, deterministic reductions based on the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) cannot rule out $n^{4-o(1)}$ time algorithms under a hypothesis called NSETH. In particular, to obtain our result for the setting of undirected graphs with unit node-capacities, we design a new randomized $O(m^{2+o(1)})$ time combinatorial algorithm, improving on the recent $O(m^{11/5+o(1)})$ time algorithm [Huang et al., STOC 2023] and matching their $m^{2-o(1)}$ lower bound (up to subpolynomial factors), thus essentially settling the time complexity for this setting of the problem. More generally, our main technical contribution is the insight that $st$-cuts can be verified quickly, and that in most settings, $st$-flows can be shipped succinctly (i.e., with respect to the flow support). This is a key idea in our non-reducibility results, and it may be of independent interest

Near-Optimal Approximate Shortest Paths and Transshipment in Distributed and Streaming Models

We present a method for solving the transshipment problem - also known as uncapacitated minimum cost flow - up to a multiplicative error of $1 + \varepsilon$ in undirected graphs with non-negative edge weights using a tailored gradient descent algorithm. Using $\tilde{O}(\cdot)$ to hide polylogarithmic factors in $n$ (the number of nodes in the graph), our gradient descent algorithm takes $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2})$ iterations, and in each iteration it solves an instance of the transshipment problem up to a multiplicative error of $\operatorname{polylog} n$. In particular, this allows us to perform a single iteration by computing a solution on a sparse spanner of logarithmic stretch. Using a randomized rounding scheme, we can further extend the method to finding approximate solutions for the single-source shortest paths (SSSP) problem. As a consequence, we improve upon prior work by obtaining the following results: (1) Broadcast CONGEST model: $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximate SSSP using $\tilde{O}((\sqrt{n} + D)\varepsilon^{-3})$ rounds, where $D$ is the (hop) diameter of the network. (2) Broadcast congested clique model: $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximate transshipment and SSSP using $\tilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2})$ rounds. (3) Multipass streaming model: $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximate transshipment and SSSP using $\tilde{O}(n)$ space and $\tilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2})$ passes. The previously fastest SSSP algorithms for these models leverage sparse hop sets. We bypass the hop set construction; computing a spanner is sufficient with our method. The above bounds assume non-negative edge weights that are polynomially bounded in $n$; for general non-negative weights, running times scale with the logarithm of the maximum ratio between non-zero weights.Comment: Accepted to SIAM Journal on Computing. Preliminary version in DISC 2017. Abstract shortened to fit arXiv's limitation to 1920 character

On the Hardness of Partially Dynamic Graph Problems and Connections to Diameter

Conditional lower bounds for dynamic graph problems has received a great deal of attention in recent years. While many results are now known for the fully-dynamic case and such bounds often imply worst-case bounds for the partially dynamic setting, it seems much more difficult to prove amortized bounds for incremental and decremental algorithms. In this paper we consider partially dynamic versions of three classic problems in graph theory. Based on popular conjectures we show that: -- No algorithm with amortized update time $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ exists for incremental or decremental maximum cardinality bipartite matching. This significantly improves on the $O(m^{1/2-\varepsilon})$ bound for sparse graphs of Henzinger et al. [STOC'15] and $O(n^{1/3-\varepsilon})$ bound of Kopelowitz, Pettie and Porat. Our linear bound also appears more natural. In addition, the result we present separates the node-addition model from the edge insertion model, as an algorithm with total update time $O(m\sqrt{n})$ exists for the former by Bosek et al. [FOCS'14]. -- No algorithm with amortized update time $O(m^{1-\varepsilon})$ exists for incremental or decremental maximum flow in directed and weighted sparse graphs. No such lower bound was known for partially dynamic maximum flow previously. Furthermore no algorithm with amortized update time $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ exists for directed and unweighted graphs or undirected and weighted graphs. -- No algorithm with amortized update time $O(n^{1/2 - \varepsilon})$ exists for incremental or decremental $(4/3-\varepsilon')$-approximating the diameter of an unweighted graph. We also show a slightly stronger bound if node additions are allowed. [...]Comment: To appear at ICALP'16. Abstract truncated to fit arXiv limit