NP vs QMA_log(2)

Although it is believed unlikely that \NP-hard problems admit efficient quantum algorithms, it has been shown that a quantum verifier can solve \NP-complete problems given a "short" quantum proof; more precisely, \NP\subseteq \QMA_{\log}(2) where \QMA_{\log}(2) denotes the class of quantum Merlin-Arthur games in which there are two unentangled provers who send two logarithmic size quantum witnesses to the verifier. The inclusion \NP\subseteq \QMA_{\log}(2) has been proved by Blier and Tapp by stating a quantum Merlin-Arthur protocol for 3-coloring with perfect completeness and gap $\frac{1}{24n^6}$. Moreover, Aaronson {\it et al.} have shown the above inclusion with a constant gap by considering $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ witnesses of logarithmic size. However, we still do not know if \QMA_{\log}(2) with a constant gap contains \NP. In this paper, we show that 3-SAT admits a \QMA_{\log}(2) protocol with the gap $\frac{1}{n^{3+\epsilon}}$ for every constant $\epsilon>0$.Comment: 10 pages. Thanks to referees, the main result is now stated in terms of 3-SAT instead of NP. Clearer proofs. To appear in Quantum Information and Computatio

The Complexity of the Separable Hamiltonian Problem

In this paper, we study variants of the canonical Local-Hamiltonian problem where, in addition, the witness is promised to be separable. We define two variants of the Local-Hamiltonian problem. The input for the Separable-Local-Hamiltonian problem is the same as the Local-Hamiltonian problem, i.e. a local Hamiltonian and two energies a and b, but the question is somewhat different: the answer is YES if there is a separable quantum state with energy at most a, and the answer is NO if all separable quantum states have energy at least b. The Separable-Sparse-Hamiltonian problem is defined similarly, but the Hamiltonian is not necessarily local, but rather sparse. We show that the Separable-Sparse-Hamiltonian problem is QMA(2)-Complete, while Separable-Local-Hamiltonian is in QMA. This should be compared to the Local-Hamiltonian problem, and the Sparse-Hamiltonian problem which are both QMA-Complete. To the best of our knowledge, Separable-SPARSE-Hamiltonian is the first non-trivial problem shown to be QMA(2)-Complete

Limitations of semidefinite programs for separable states and entangled games

Semidefinite programs (SDPs) are a framework for exact or approximate optimization that have widespread application in quantum information theory. We introduce a new method for using reductions to construct integrality gaps for SDPs. These are based on new limitations on the sum-of-squares (SoS) hierarchy in approximating two particularly important sets in quantum information theory, where previously no $\omega(1)$-round integrality gaps were known: the set of separable (i.e. unentangled) states, or equivalently, the $2 \rightarrow 4$ norm of a matrix, and the set of quantum correlations; i.e. conditional probability distributions achievable with local measurements on a shared entangled state. In both cases no-go theorems were previously known based on computational assumptions such as the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) which asserts that 3-SAT requires exponential time to solve. Our unconditional results achieve the same parameters as all of these previous results (for separable states) or as some of the previous results (for quantum correlations). In some cases we can make use of the framework of Lee-Raghavendra-Steurer (LRS) to establish integrality gaps for any SDP, not only the SoS hierarchy. Our hardness result on separable states also yields a dimension lower bound of approximate disentanglers, answering a question of Watrous and Aaronson et al. These results can be viewed as limitations on the monogamy principle, the PPT test, the ability of Tsirelson-type bounds to restrict quantum correlations, as well as the SDP hierarchies of Doherty-Parrilo-Spedalieri, Navascues-Pironio-Acin and Berta-Fawzi-Scholz.Comment: 47 pages. v2. small changes, fixes and clarifications. published versio

Computação quântica : autômatos, jogos e complexidade

Orientador: Arnaldo Vieira MouraDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de ComputaçãoResumo: Desde seu surgimento, Teoria da Computação tem lidado com modelos computacionais de maneira matemática e abstrata. A noção de computação eficiente foi investigada usando esses modelos sem procurar entender as capacidades e limitações inerentes ao mundo físico. A Computação Quântica representa uma ruptura com esse paradigma. Enraizada nos postulados da Mecânica Quântica, ela é capaz de atribuir um sentido físico preciso à computação segundo nosso melhor entendimento da natureza. Esses postulados dão origem a propriedades fundamentalmente diferentes, uma em especial, chamada emaranhamento, é de importância central para computação e processamento de informação. O emaranhamento captura uma noção de correlação que é única a modelos quânticos. Essas correlações quânticas podem ser mais fortes do que qualquer correlação clássica estando dessa forma no coração de algumas capacidades quânticas que vão além do clássico. Nessa dissertação, nós investigamos o emaranhamento da perspectiva da complexidade computacional quântica. Mais precisamente, nós estudamos uma classe bem conhecida, definida em termos de verificação de provas, em que um verificador tem acesso à múltiplas provas não emaranhadas (QMA(k)). Assumir que as provas não contêm correlações quânticas parece ser uma hipótese não trivial, potencialmente fazendo com que essa classe seja maior do que aquela em que há apenas uma prova. Contudo, encontrar cotas de complexidade justas para QMA(k) permanece uma questão central sem resposta por mais de uma década. Nesse contexto, nossa contribuição é tripla. Primeiramente, estudamos classes relacionadas mostrando como alguns recursos computacionais podem afetar seu poder de forma a melhorar a compreensão a respeito da própria classe QMA(k). Em seguida, estabelecemos uma relação entre Probabilistically Checkable Proofs (PCP) clássicos e QMA(k). Isso nos permite recuperar resultados conhecidos de maneira unificada e simplificada. Para finalizar essa parte, mostramos que alguns caminhos para responder essa questão em aberto estão obstruídos por dificuldades computacionais. Em um segundo momento, voltamos nossa atenção para modelos restritos de computação quântica, mais especificamente, autômatos quânticos finitos. Um modelo conhecido como Two-way Quantum Classical Finite Automaton (2QCFA) é o objeto principal de nossa pesquisa. Seu estudo tem o intuito de revelar o poder computacional provido por memória quântica de dimensão finita. Nos estendemos esse autômato com a capacidade de colocar um número finito de marcadores na fita de entrada. Para qualquer número de marcadores, mostramos que essa extensão é mais poderosa do que seus análogos clássicos determinístico e probabilístico. Além de trazer avanços em duas linhas complementares de pesquisa, essa dissertação provê uma vasta exposição a ambos os campos: complexidade computacional e autômatosAbstract: Since its inception, Theoretical Computer Science has dealt with models of computation primarily in a very abstract and mathematical way. The notion of efficient computation was investigated using these models mainly without seeking to understand the inherent capabilities and limitations of the actual physical world. In this regard, Quantum Computing represents a rupture with respect to this paradigm. Rooted on the postulates of Quantum Mechanics, it is able to attribute a precise physical notion to computation as far as our understanding of nature goes. These postulates give rise to fundamentally different properties one of which, namely entanglement, is of central importance to computation and information processing tasks. Entanglement captures a notion of correlation unique to quantum models. This quantum correlation can be stronger than any classical one, thus being at the heart of some quantum super-classical capabilities. In this thesis, we investigate entanglement from the perspective of quantum computational complexity. More precisely, we study a well known complexity class, defined in terms of proof verification, in which a verifier has access to multiple unentangled quantum proofs (QMA(k)). Assuming the proofs do not exhibit quantum correlations seems to be a non-trivial hypothesis, potentially making this class larger than the one in which only a single proof is given. Notwithstanding, finding tight complexity bounds for QMA(k) has been a central open question in quantum complexity for over a decade. In this context, our contributions are threefold. Firstly, we study closely related classes showing how computational resources may affect its power in order to shed some light on \QMA(k) itself. Secondly, we establish a relationship between classical Probabilistically Checkable Proofs and QMA(k) allowing us to recover known results in unified and simplified way, besides exposing the interplay between them. Thirdly, we show that some paths to settle this open question are obstructed by computational hardness. In a second moment, we turn our attention to restricted models of quantum computation, more specifically, quantum finite automata. A model known as Two-way Quantum Classical Finite Automaton (2QCFA) is the main object of our inquiry. Its study is intended to reveal the computational power provided by finite dimensional quantum memory. We extend this automaton with the capability of placing a finite number of markers in the input tape. For any number of markers, we show that this extension is more powerful than its classical deterministic and probabilistic analogues. Besides bringing advances to these two complementary lines of inquiry, this thesis also provides a vast exposition to both subjects: computational complexity and automata theoryMestradoCiência da ComputaçãoMestre em Ciência da Computaçã