Hop and HipHop : Multitier Web Orchestration

Rich applications merge classical computing, client-server concurrency, web-based interfaces, and the complex time- and event-based reactive programming found in embedded systems. To handle them, we extend the Hop web programming platform by HipHop, a domain-specific language dedicated to event-based process orchestration. Borrowing the synchronous reactive model of Esterel, HipHop is based on synchronous concurrency and preemption primitives that are known to be key components for the modular design of complex reactive behaviors. HipHop departs from Esterel by its ability to handle the dynamicity of Web applications, thanks to the reflexivity of Hop. Using a music player example, we show how to modularly build a non-trivial Hop application using HipHop orchestration code.Comment: International Conference on Distributed Computing and Internet Technology (2014

Borrowing words in technology term of "Jawa Pos Online" website

This thesis examines about English borrowing word, especially technology term in Jawa Pos Online website. This thesis focuses to find the kind and change in meaning process of borrowing word in Jawa Pos Online website. Many researchers have been analyzed about borrowing word in different term such as, Lorania focused in political term (2011), Adha focused in music term (2016), and Sekarrosa focused in business and sport term (2014). The researcher uses some theories about borrowing word from Yule, Charles F. Hockett, and Albert C. Baugh. This research also using content analysis as the methodology because this research explain kinds of borrowing word and process of change in meaning in online article. In addition, the researcher acts as key instrument – human instrument. In the data collection, reading the whole article in 30 days, classifying the borrowing word, and analyzing the data. As the result, the researcher found many borrowing words, but only 30 words categorized as technology term. They divided into three kinds, loan shift, loan blend, and loan word. Then there are two kinds of change in meaning process in Jawa Pos Online website. They are; Extension of meaning and Narrowing of meaning. The frequency of all the data is 68 data, and the most appeared data is ‘teknisi’ with 11 times

“I Have a [Fair Use] Dream”: Historic Copyrighted Works and the Recognition of Meaningful Rights for the Public

Dr. Martin Luther King wrote and delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech more than fifty years ago. When he obtained copyright protection on the speech in 1963, Dr. King (and later his estate) would have expected the copyright to last a maximum of fifty-six years. That fifty-six-year copyright has become a ninety-five-year copyright, thanks to lengthy duration extensions enacted by Congress in the mid-1970s and late 1990s. As a result, the copyright on the “I Have a Dream” speech will not expire until the end of 2058. Because the Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. and its affili- ates have closely guarded the speech in a copyright enforcement and li- censing sense, the public seldom sees more than snippets of one of the most highly regarded speeches in history. Greater public exposure to the full speech would serve important purposes of the sort recognized by Congress in the fair use section of the Copyright Act. However, those interested in borrowing from or otherwise using the speech have tended to drop their plans or have obtained a costly license from the King Estate or one of the affiliated entities—even when the users may had have a plausible right under the fair use doctrine to borrow from or use the speech without ob- taining a license. With the copyright on the speech not expiring until the end of 2058, there is a danger that the snippets-only nature of the pub- lic’s exposure to the speech will remain the status quo for more than another four decades. Infringement cases that have not been settled by the parties have yielded judicial rulings on whether the “I Have a Dream” speech was properly copyrighted, but no case has been litigated extensively enough to permit a court to address the defendant’s fair use defense. This Article proposes a fair use analysis appropriate for use by courts in the event that a user of the “I Have a Dream” speech departs from the usual tendency to obtain a license in order to avoid litigation and, instead, rests its fate on the fair use doctrine. The proposed analysis gives a suitably expansive scope to the fair use doctrine for cases dealing with uses of the speech or similarly historic works, given the important public purposes that could be served by many such uses. The Article also develops a test for use in determining whether a work is sufficiently historic, for purposes of the fair use analysis proposed here

Unmasking Hybridity in Popular Performance

This paper explores cultural hybridization in popular music and the eroticization of the exotic eastern aesthetic. Using musicology and anthropology as tools, the paper examines varying perspectives of the artists, audience and marginalized groups. Although cultural appropriation has been used recently as a blanket buzzword in mainstream dialogue, it does provide a platform to discuss complex issues on gender, race and sexuality that has been muddled by colonial mentalities

What Is (And Isn\u27t) Fair Use in Music Sampling?

Fair use is a principle embedded in copyright law which permits -- under circumstances governed by a set of considerations commonly known as the four factors -- the borrowing of material from copyrighted works to create new works. Created for Fair Use Week 2018, this poster highlights the principle as it has applied to three controversial cases involving music sampling. For each case, the observer is given the essential facts; shown which of the four factors (represented by icons) were most central; and told the real-world outcome of each case. As an interactive display, the poster covered each Outcome column with a flap, requesting the observer to make a guess as to the outcome before confirming it. Via a listening stand near the poster, observers were also enabled to hear excerpts from the contested works. Those excerpts may be accessed at:http://musselmanlibrary.org/fair-use-week/2018/samples.htm

Bringing Swirly Music to Life: Why Copyright Law Should Adopt Patent Law Standards for Joint Authorship of Sound Engineers

Geoff Emerick, acclaimed sound engineer for The Beatles, passed away in October of 2018. Emerick helped shape The Beatles’ sound and worked to create many of their most recognized songs, yet, under the current joint authorship standards he likely would not be considered an author of these songs. This Note details the work carried out by sound engineers in the music industry and describes how current joint authorship standards affect them. It then proposes a reinterpretation of joint authorship in the copyright to statute to ease these standards by borrowing from another area of intellectual property law