1,121 research outputs found
Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning
Learning-based pattern classifiers, including deep networks, have shown
impressive performance in several application domains, ranging from computer
vision to cybersecurity. However, it has also been shown that adversarial input
perturbations carefully crafted either at training or at test time can easily
subvert their predictions. The vulnerability of machine learning to such wild
patterns (also referred to as adversarial examples), along with the design of
suitable countermeasures, have been investigated in the research field of
adversarial machine learning. In this work, we provide a thorough overview of
the evolution of this research area over the last ten years and beyond,
starting from pioneering, earlier work on the security of non-deep learning
algorithms up to more recent work aimed to understand the security properties
of deep learning algorithms, in the context of computer vision and
cybersecurity tasks. We report interesting connections between these
apparently-different lines of work, highlighting common misconceptions related
to the security evaluation of machine-learning algorithms. We review the main
threat models and attacks defined to this end, and discuss the main limitations
of current work, along with the corresponding future challenges towards the
design of more secure learning algorithms.Comment: Accepted for publication on Pattern Recognition, 201
Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks
Deep Convolutional Networks (DCNs) have been shown to be vulnerable to
adversarial examples---perturbed inputs specifically designed to produce
intentional errors in the learning algorithms at test time. Existing
input-agnostic adversarial perturbations exhibit interesting visual patterns
that are currently unexplained. In this paper, we introduce a structured
approach for generating Universal Adversarial Perturbations (UAPs) with
procedural noise functions. Our approach unveils the systemic vulnerability of
popular DCN models like Inception v3 and YOLO v3, with single noise patterns
able to fool a model on up to 90% of the dataset. Procedural noise allows us to
generate a distribution of UAPs with high universal evasion rates using only a
few parameters. Additionally, we propose Bayesian optimization to efficiently
learn procedural noise parameters to construct inexpensive untargeted black-box
attacks. We demonstrate that it can achieve an average of less than 10 queries
per successful attack, a 100-fold improvement on existing methods. We further
motivate the use of input-agnostic defences to increase the stability of models
to adversarial perturbations. The universality of our attacks suggests that DCN
models may be sensitive to aggregations of low-level class-agnostic features.
These findings give insight on the nature of some universal adversarial
perturbations and how they could be generated in other applications.Comment: 16 pages, 10 figures. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC
Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS '19
- …