15,866 research outputs found
Beyond Monte Carlo Tree Search: Playing Go with Deep Alternative Neural Network and Long-Term Evaluation
Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) is extremely popular in computer Go which
determines each action by enormous simulations in a broad and deep search tree.
However, human experts select most actions by pattern analysis and careful
evaluation rather than brute search of millions of future nteractions. In this
paper, we propose a computer Go system that follows experts way of thinking and
playing. Our system consists of two parts. The first part is a novel deep
alternative neural network (DANN) used to generate candidates of next move.
Compared with existing deep convolutional neural network (DCNN), DANN inserts
recurrent layer after each convolutional layer and stacks them in an
alternative manner. We show such setting can preserve more contexts of local
features and its evolutions which are beneficial for move prediction. The
second part is a long-term evaluation (LTE) module used to provide a reliable
evaluation of candidates rather than a single probability from move predictor.
This is consistent with human experts nature of playing since they can foresee
tens of steps to give an accurate estimation of candidates. In our system, for
each candidate, LTE calculates a cumulative reward after several future
interactions when local variations are settled. Combining criteria from the two
parts, our system determines the optimal choice of next move. For more
comprehensive experiments, we introduce a new professional Go dataset (PGD),
consisting of 253233 professional records. Experiments on GoGoD and PGD
datasets show the DANN can substantially improve performance of move prediction
over pure DCNN. When combining LTE, our system outperforms most relevant
approaches and open engines based on MCTS.Comment: AAAI 201
Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People
Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has renewed interest in
building systems that learn and think like people. Many advances have come from
using deep neural networks trained end-to-end in tasks such as object
recognition, video games, and board games, achieving performance that equals or
even beats humans in some respects. Despite their biological inspiration and
performance achievements, these systems differ from human intelligence in
crucial ways. We review progress in cognitive science suggesting that truly
human-like learning and thinking machines will have to reach beyond current
engineering trends in both what they learn, and how they learn it.
Specifically, we argue that these machines should (a) build causal models of
the world that support explanation and understanding, rather than merely
solving pattern recognition problems; (b) ground learning in intuitive theories
of physics and psychology, to support and enrich the knowledge that is learned;
and (c) harness compositionality and learning-to-learn to rapidly acquire and
generalize knowledge to new tasks and situations. We suggest concrete
challenges and promising routes towards these goals that can combine the
strengths of recent neural network advances with more structured cognitive
models.Comment: In press at Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Open call for commentary
proposals (until Nov. 22, 2016).
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/information/calls-for-commentary/open-calls-for-commentar
- …