469 research outputs found

    Enumeration of three term arithmetic progressions in fixed density sets

    Full text link
    Additive combinatorics is built around the famous theorem by Szemer\'edi which asserts existence of arithmetic progressions of any length among the integers. There exist several different proofs of the theorem based on very different techniques. Szemer\'edi's theorem is an existence statement, whereas the ultimate goal in combinatorics is always to make enumeration statements. In this article we develop new methods based on real algebraic geometry to obtain several quantitative statements on the number of arithmetic progressions in fixed density sets. We further discuss the possibility of a generalization of Szemer\'edi's theorem using methods from real algebraic geometry.Comment: 62 pages. Update v2: Corrected some references. Update v3: Incorporated feedbac

    Rado Numbers and SAT Computations

    Full text link
    Given a linear equation E\mathcal{E}, the kk-color Rado number Rk(E)R_k(\mathcal{E}) is the smallest integer nn such that every kk-coloring of {1,2,3,,n}\{1,2,3,\dots,n\} contains a monochromatic solution to E\mathcal E. The degree of regularity of E\mathcal E, denoted dor(E)dor(\mathcal E), is the largest value kk such that Rk(E)R_k(\mathcal E) is finite. In this article we present new theoretical and computational results about the Rado numbers R3(E)R_3(\mathcal{E}) and the degree of regularity of three-variable equations E\mathcal{E}. % We use SAT solvers to compute many new values of the three-color Rado numbers R3(ax+by+cz=0)R_3(ax+by+cz = 0) for fixed integers a,b,a,b, and cc. We also give a SAT-based method to compute infinite families of these numbers. In particular, we show that the value of R3(xy=(m2)z)R_3(x-y = (m-2) z) is equal to m3m2m1m^3-m^2-m-1 for m3m\ge 3. This resolves a conjecture of Myers and implies the conjecture that the generalized Schur numbers S(m,3)=R3(x1+x2+xm1=xm)S(m,3) = R_3(x_1+x_2 + \dots x_{m-1} = x_m) equal m3m2m1m^3-m^2-m-1 for m3m\ge 3. Our SAT solver computations, combined with our new combinatorial results, give improved bounds on dor(ax+by=cz)dor(ax+by = cz) and exact values for 1a,b,c51\le a,b,c\le 5 . We also give counterexamples to a conjecture of Golowich

    Generalised Rado and Roth criteria

    Get PDF
    We study the Ramsey properties of equations a1P(x1)++asP(xs)=ba_1P(x_1) + \cdots + a_sP(x_s) = b, where a1,,as,ba_1,\ldots,a_s,b are integers, and PP is an integer polynomial of degree dd. Provided there are at least (1+o(1))d2(1+o(1))d^2 variables, we show that Rado's criterion and an intersectivity condition completely characterise which equations of this form admit monochromatic solutions with respect to an arbitrary finite colouring of the positive integers. Furthermore, we obtain a Roth-type theorem for these equations, showing that they admit non-constant solutions over any set of integers with positive upper density if and only if b=a1++as=0b= a_1 + \cdots + a_s = 0. In addition, we establish sharp asymptotic lower bounds for the number of monochromatic/dense solutions (supersaturation).Comment: 36 page

    A new four parameter q-series identity and its partition implications

    Full text link
    We prove a new four parameter q-hypergeometric series identity from which the three parameter key identity for the Goellnitz theorem due to Alladi, Andrews, and Gordon, follows as a special case by setting one of the parameters equal to 0. The new identity is equivalent to a four parameter partition theorem which extends the deep theorem of Goellnitz and thereby settles a problem raised by Andrews thirty years ago. Some consequences including a quadruple product extension of Jacobi's triple product identity, and prospects of future research are briefly discussed.Comment: 25 pages, in Sec. 3 Table 1 is added, discussion is added at the end of Sec. 5, minor stylistic changes, typos eliminated. To appear in Inventiones Mathematica

    Distributed PCP Theorems for Hardness of Approximation in P

    Get PDF
    We present a new distributed model of probabilistically checkable proofs (PCP). A satisfying assignment x{0,1}nx \in \{0,1\}^n to a CNF formula φ\varphi is shared between two parties, where Alice knows x1,,xn/2x_1, \dots, x_{n/2}, Bob knows xn/2+1,,xnx_{n/2+1},\dots,x_n, and both parties know φ\varphi. The goal is to have Alice and Bob jointly write a PCP that xx satisfies φ\varphi, while exchanging little or no information. Unfortunately, this model as-is does not allow for nontrivial query complexity. Instead, we focus on a non-deterministic variant, where the players are helped by Merlin, a third party who knows all of xx. Using our framework, we obtain, for the first time, PCP-like reductions from the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) to approximation problems in P. In particular, under SETH we show that there are no truly-subquadratic approximation algorithms for Bichromatic Maximum Inner Product over {0,1}-vectors, Bichromatic LCS Closest Pair over permutations, Approximate Regular Expression Matching, and Diameter in Product Metric. All our inapproximability factors are nearly-tight. In particular, for the first two problems we obtain nearly-polynomial factors of 2(logn)1o(1)2^{(\log n)^{1-o(1)}}; only (1+o(1))(1+o(1))-factor lower bounds (under SETH) were known before
    corecore