38 research outputs found

    ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋‹ค๋ชฉ์  ๋น„ํ–‰ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ•๊ฑด ์ œ์–ด ๋ฐ ์™„์ „๊ตฌ๋™ ๋น„ํ–‰ ๋งค์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ๊น€ํ˜„์ง„.์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚  ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ ๋ฌด์ธํ•ญ๊ณต๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ˆœํ•œ ๋น„ํ–‰ ๋ฐ ๊ณต์ค‘ ์˜์ƒ ์ดฌ์˜์šฉ ์žฅ๋น„์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ๋„˜์–ด ๋น„ํ–‰ ๋งค๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜, ๊ณต์ค‘ ํ™”๋ฌผ ์šด์†ก ๋ฐ ๊ณต์ค‘ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ž„๋ฌด์— ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ถ”์„ธ์— ๋งž์ถ”์–ด ๋กœ๋ณดํ‹ฑ์Šค ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ ๋ฌด์ธํ•ญ๊ณต๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋ถ€๊ณผ๋œ ์ž„๋ฌด์— ๋งž์ถ”์–ด ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์žฅ๋น„ ๋ฐ ์„ผ์„œ๋ฅผ ์ž์œ ๋กœ์ด ํƒ‘์žฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น„ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ชฉ์  ๊ณต์ค‘ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์‹๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์€ ๋Œํ’ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์™ธ๋ž€์— ๋‹ค์†Œ ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ ์ œ์–ด์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ณ‘์ง„์šด๋™์˜ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋น„ํ–‰ ์ค‘ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋™์ฒด์˜ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ด ์„ผ์„œ ๋“ฑ ๋™์ฒด์— ๋ถ€์ฐฉ๋œ ํƒ‘์žฌ๋ฌผ์˜ ์ž์„ธ ๋˜ํ•œ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‹จ์ ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์™ธ๋ž€์— ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ, ๋ณ‘์ง„์šด๋™๊ณผ ์ž์„ธ์šด๋™์„ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์–ดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์™„์ „๊ตฌ๋™ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ ๋น„ํ–‰ ๋งค์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ•๊ฑด ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋จผ์ € ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ณ‘์ง„์šด๋™ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ณ‘์ง„ ํž˜ ์ƒ์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ๋’ค์ด์–ด ๋ณ‘์ง„ ํž˜ ์™ธ๋ž€์— ๊ฐ•๊ฑดํ•œ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์™ธ๋ž€๊ด€์ธก๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ•๊ฑด ์ œ์–ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์˜ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ ๋ฃจํ”„ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์€ mu ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜๋ฉฐ, mu ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์ด ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์—„๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์Šค๋ชฐ๊ฒŒ์ธ ์ด๋ก  (Small Gain Theorem) ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ œ์‹œ ๋ฐ ๋น„๊ต๋œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…ํ•œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๋ณ‘์ง„ ๊ฐ€์†๋„ ์ œ์–ด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ฐ ํž˜ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ์ธ๊ฐ€๋˜๋Š” ๋ณ‘์ง„ ์šด๋™ ์™ธ๋ž€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ทน๋ณต ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋น„ํ–‰ ์ง€์  ๋ฐ ๊ถค์  ์ถ”์ข… ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์™„์ „ ๊ตฌ๋™ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์™„์ „๊ตฌ๋™ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์ค‘๋Ÿ‰ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ์ €์กฐํ•œ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋งค์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋งค์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ์™€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋˜ ์™„์ „๊ตฌ๋™์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์˜ค์ง ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์„œ๋ณด๋ชจํ„ฐ๋งŒ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜•๋งŒ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋„๋ก ์„ค๊ณ„๋œ๋‹ค. ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ๋™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์œ ๋„๋œ ์šด๋™๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ 6์ž์œ ๋„ ๋น„ํ–‰ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ์†Œ๊ฐœ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜๊ณผ ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์˜ ์™„์ „๊ตฌ๋™ ๋น„ํ–‰ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์™„์ „๊ตฌ๋™ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋กœํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์—ฌ๋ถ„์˜ ์ œ์–ด์ž…๋ ฅ(redundancy)๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์ฟผ๋“œ์ฝฅํ„ฐ์˜ ๋‹จ์ผ๋ชจํ„ฐ ๊ณ ์žฅ ๋Œ€๋น„ ๋น„์ƒ ๋น„ํ–‰ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋น„์ƒ ๋น„ํ–‰ ์ „๋žต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์†Œ๊ฐœ ๋ฐ ์‹คํ˜„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•, ๋น„์ƒ ๋น„ํ–‰ ์‹œ์˜ ๋™์—ญํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์†Œ๊ฐœ๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์‹คํ—˜๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ๋‹ค.Recently, multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are used for a variety of missions beyond its basic flight, including aerial manipulation, aerial payload transportation, and aerial sensor platform. Following this trend, the multirotor UAV is recognized as a versatile aerial robotics platform that can freely mount and fly the necessary mission equipment and sensors to perform missions. However, the current multi-rotor platform has a relatively poor ability to maintain nominal flight performance against external disturbances such as wind or gust compared to other robotics platforms. Also, the multirotor suffers from maintaining a stable payload attitude, due to the fact that the attitude of the fuselage should continuously be changed for translational motion control. Particularly, unstabilized fuselage attitude can be a drawback for multirotor's mission performance in such cases as like visual odometry-based flight, since the fuselage-attached sensor should also be tilted during the flight and therefore causes poor sensor information acquisition. To overcome the above two problems, in this dissertation, we introduce a robust multirotor control method and a novel full-actuation mechanism which widens the usability of the multirotor. The goal of the proposed control method is to bring robustness to the translational motion control against various weather conditions. And the goal of the full actuation mechanism is to allow the multi-rotor to take arbitrary payload/fuselage attitude independently of the translational motion. For robust multirotor control, we first introduce a translational force generation technique for accurate translational motion control and then discuss the design method of disturbance observer (DOB)-based robust control algorithm. The stability of the proposed feedback controller is validated by the mu-stability analysis technique, and the results are compared to the small-gain theorem (SGT)-based stability analysis to validate the rigorousness of the analysis. Through the experiments, we validate the translational acceleration control performance of the developed controller and confirm the robustness against external disturbance forces. For a fully-actuated multirotor platform, we propose a new mechanism called a T3-Multirotor that can overcome the excessive weight increase and poor energy efficiency of the existing fully-actuated multirotor. The structure of the new platform is designed to be as close as possible to the existing multi-rotor and includes only two servo motors for full actuation. The dynamic characteristics of the new platform are analyzed and a six-degree-of-freedom (DOF) flight controller is designed based on the derived equations of motion. The full actuation of the proposed platform is then validated through various experiments. As a derivative study, this paper also introduces an emergency flight technique to prepare for a single motor failure scenario of a multi-rotor using the redundancy of the T3-Multirotor platform. The detailed introduction and implementation method of the emergency flight strategy with the analysis of the dynamic characteristics during the emergency flight is introduced, and the experimental results are provided to verify the validity of the proposed technique.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Literature survey 3 1.2.1 Robust translational motion control 3 1.2.2 Fully-actuated multirotor platform 4 1.3 Research objectives and contributions 5 1.3.1 Goal #I: Robust multirotor motion control 5 1.3.2 Goal #II: A new fully actuated multirotor platform 6 1.3.3 Goal #II-A: T3-Multirotor-based fail-safe flight 7 1.4 Thesis organization 7 2 Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Overview 9 2.1 Platform overview 9 2.2 Mathematical model of multi-rotor UAV 10 3 Robust Translational Motion Control 13 3.1 Introduction 14 3.2 Translational force/acceleration control 14 3.2.1 Relationship between \mathbf{r} and \tilde{\ddot{\mathbf{X}}} 15 3.2.2 Calculation of \mathbf{r}_d from \tilde{\ddot{\mathbf{X}}}_d considering dynamics 16 3.3 Disturbance observer 22 3.3.1 An overview of the disturbance-merged overall system 22 3.3.2 Disturbance observer 22 3.4 Stability analysis 26 3.4.1 Modeling of P(s) considering uncertainties 27 3.4.2 \tau-determination through \mu-analysis 30 3.5 Simulation and experimental result 34 3.5.1 Validation of acceleration tracking performance 34 3.5.2 Validation of DOB performance 34 4 Fully-Actuated Multirotor Mechanism 39 4.1 Introduction 39 4.2 Mechanism 40 4.3 Modeling 42 4.3.1 General equations of motion of TP and FP 42 4.3.2 Simplified equations of motion of TP and FP 46 4.4 Controller design 49 4.4.1 Controller overview 49 4.4.2 Independent roll and pitch attitude control of TP and FP 50 4.4.3 Heading angle control 54 4.4.4 Overall control scheme 54 4.5 Simulation result 56 4.5.1 Scenario 1: Changing FP attitude during hovering 58 4.5.2 Scenario 2: Fixing FP attitude during translation 58 4.6 Experimental result 60 4.6.1 Scenario 1: Changing FP attitude during hovering 60 4.6.2 Scenario 2: Fixing FP attitude during translation 60 4.7 Applications 63 4.7.1 Personal aerial vehicle 63 4.7.2 High MoI payload transportation platform - revisit of [1] 63 4.7.3 Take-off and landing on an oscillating landing pad 64 5 Derived Research: Fail-safe Flight in a Single Motor Failure Scenario 67 5.1 Introduction 67 5.1.1 Related works 68 5.1.2 Contributions 68 5.2 Mechanism and dynamics 69 5.2.1 Mechanism 69 5.2.2 Platform dynamics 70 5.3 Fail-safe flight strategy 75 5.3.1 Fail-safe flight method 75 5.3.2 Hardware condition for single motor fail-safe flight 80 5.4 Controller design 83 5.4.1 Faulty motor detection 83 5.4.2 Controller design 84 5.4.3 Attitude dynamics in fail-safe mode 86 5.5 Experiment result 90 5.5.1 Experimental settings 90 5.5.2 Stability and control performance review 92 5.5.3 Flight results 93 6 Conclusions 96 Abstract (in Korean) 107Docto

    Challenges in control and autonomy of unmanned aerial-aquatic vehicles

    Get PDF
    Autonomous aquatic vehicles capable of flight can deploy more rapidly, access remote or constricted areas, overfly obstacles and transition easily between distinct bodies of water. This new class of vehicles can be referred as Unmanned Aerial-Aquatic Vehicles (UAAVs), and is capable of reaching distant locations rapidly, conducting measurements and returning to base. This greatly improves upon current solutions, which often involve integrating different types of vehicles (e.g. vessels releasing underwater vehicles), or rely on manpower (e.g. sensors dropped manually from ships). Thanks to recent research efforts, UAAVs are becoming more sophisticated and robust. Nonetheless numerous challenges remain to be addressed, and particularly dedicated control and sensing solutions are still scarce. This paper discusses challenges and opportunities in UAAV control, sensing and actuation. Following a brief overview of the state of the art, we elaborate on the requirements and challenges for the main types of robots and missions proposed in the literature to date, and highlight existing solutions where available. The concise but wide-ranging overview provided will constitute a useful starting point for researchers undertaking UAAV control work

    Force-Canceling Mixer Algorithm for Vehicles with Fully-Articulated Radially Symmetric Thruster Arrays

    Get PDF
    A new type of fully-holonomic aerial vehicle is identified and developed that can optionally utilize automatic cancellation of excessive thruster forces to maintain precise control despite little or no throttle authority. After defining the physical attributes of the new vehicle, a flight control mixer algorithm is defined and presented. This mixer is an input/output abstraction that grants a flight control system (or pilot) full authority of the vehicle\u27s position and orientation by means of an input translation vector and input torque vector. The mixer is shown to be general with respect to the number of thrusters in the system provided that they are distributed in a radially symmetric array. As the mixer is designed to operate independently of the chosen flight control system, it is completely agnostic to the type of control methodology implemented. Validation of both the vehicle\u27s holonomic capabilities and efficacy of the flight control mixing algorithm are provided by a custom MATLAB-based rigid body simulation environment

    Intelligent Control for Fixed-Wing eVTOL Aircraft

    Get PDF
    Urban Air Mobility (UAM) holds promise for personal air transportation by deploying "flying cars" over cities. As such, fixed-wing electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft has gained popularity as they can swiftly traverse cluttered areas, while also efficiently covering longer distances. These modes of operation call for an enhanced level of precision, safety, and intelligence for flight control. The hybrid nature of these aircraft poses a unique challenge that stems from complex aerodynamic interactions between wings, rotors, and the environment. Thus accurate estimation of external forces is indispensable for a high performance flight. However, traditional methods that stitch together different control schemes often fall short during hybrid flight modes. On the other hand, learning-based approaches circumvent modeling complexities, but they often lack theoretical guarantees for stability. In the first part of this thesis, we study the theoretical benefits of these fixed-wing eVTOL aircraft, followed by the derivation of a novel unified control framework. It consists of nonlinear position and attitude controllers using forces and moments as inputs; and control allocation modules that determine desired attitudes and thruster signals. Next, we present a composite adaptation scheme for linear-in-parameter (LiP) dynamics models, which provides accurate realtime estimation for wing and rotor forces based on measurements from a three-dimensional airflow sensor. Then, we introduce a design method to optimize multirotor configuration that ensures a property of robustness against rotor failures. In the second part of the thesis, we use deep neural networks (DNN) to learn part of unmodeled dynamics of the flight vehicles. Spectral normalization that regulates the Lipschitz constants of the neural network is applied for better generalization outside the training domain. The resultant network is utilized in a nonlinear feedback controller with a contraction mapping update, solving the nonaffine-in-control issue that arises. Next, we formulate general methods for designing and training DNN-based dynamics, controller, and observer. The general framework can theoretically handle any nonlinear dynamics with prior knowledge of its structure. Finally, we establish a delay compensation technique that transforms nominal controllers for an undelayed system into a sample-based predictive controller with numerical integration. The proposed method handles both first-order and transport delays in actuators and balances between numerical accuracy and computational efficiency to guarantee stability under strict hardware limitations.</p

    Fault Tolerant Control of a X8-VB Quadcopter

    Get PDF
    In this dissertation new modeling and fault tolerant control methodologies of a quadcopter with X8 configuration are proposed; studies done to actuators faults and possible reconfigurations are also presented. The main research effort has been done to design and implement the kinematic and dynamic model of a quadcopter with X8 configuration in Simulinkยฎ. Moreover, simulation and control of the quadcopter in a virtual reality world using Simulink3Dยฎ and real world experimental results from a quadcopter assembled for this purpose. The main contributions are the modeling of a X8 architecture and a fault tolerant control approach. In order to show the performance of the controllers in closed-loop, simulation results with the model of a X8 quadcopter and real world experiments are presented. The simulations and experiments revealed good performance of the control systems due to the aircraft model quality. The conclusion of the theoretical studies done in the field of actuatorsโ€™ fault tolerance were validated with simulation and real experiments

    Dynamics estimator based robust fault-tolerant control for VTOL UAVs trajectory tracking

    Get PDF
    This paper investigates the control issue of the trajectory tracking of vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the presence of partial propeller fault and external disturbance. In particular, a robust passive fault-tolerant control strategy is proposed by introducing a first-order filter based dynamics estimator. First, a bounded force command is exploited by employing a new smooth saturation function in the output of the estimator. A sufficient condition in terms of a specified parameter selection criteria is provided to ensure the nonsingularity extraction of the command attitude. Then, a torque command is applied to the attitude loop tracking. Since there is merely one filter parameter involved in the dynamics estimator, the practical implementation and parameter tuning can be significantly simplified. Stability analysis indicates that the proposed control strategy guarantees the semi-globally ultimately bounded tracking of VTOL UAVs subject to partial propeller fault and external disturbance. Simulation and experiment results with comparison examples are performed to validate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. Experimental results show that the proposed strategy achieves the trajectory tracking with a good performance (mean deviation 0.0074 m and standard deviation 0.1202 m) in the presence of 35% propeller fault and 4 m/s persistent wind disturbance

    Investigation of risk-aware MDP and POMDP contingency management autonomy for UAS

    Full text link
    Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) are being increasingly adopted for various applications. The risk UAS poses to people and property must be kept to acceptable levels. This paper proposes risk-aware contingency management autonomy to prevent an accident in the event of component malfunction, specifically propulsion unit failure and/or battery degradation. The proposed autonomy is modeled as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) whose solution is a contingency management policy that appropriately executes emergency landing, flight termination or continuation of planned flight actions. Motivated by the potential for errors in fault/failure indicators, partial observability of the MDP state space is investigated. The performance of optimal policies is analyzed over varying observability conditions in a high-fidelity simulator. Results indicate that both partially observable MDP (POMDP) and maximum a posteriori MDP policies performed similarly over different state observability criteria, given the nearly deterministic state transition model

    Advanced Feedback Linearization Control for Tiltrotor UAVs: Gait Plan, Controller Design, and Stability Analysis

    Full text link
    Three challenges, however, can hinder the application of Feedback Linearization: over-intensive control signals, singular decoupling matrix, and saturation. Activating any of these three issues can challenge the stability proof. To solve these three challenges, first, this research proposed the drone gait plan. The gait plan was initially used to figure out the control problems in quadruped (four-legged) robots; applying this approach, accompanied by Feedback Linearization, the quality of the control signals was enhanced. Then, we proposed the concept of unacceptable attitude curves, which are not allowed for the tiltrotor to travel to. The Two Color Map Theorem was subsequently established to enlarge the supported attitude for the tiltrotor. These theories were employed in the tiltrotor tracking problem with different references. Notable improvements in the control signals were witnessed in the tiltrotor simulator. Finally, we explored the control theory, the stability proof of the novel mobile robot (tilt vehicle) stabilized by Feedback Linearization with saturation. Instead of adopting the tiltrotor model, which is over-complicated, we designed a conceptual mobile robot (tilt-car) to analyze the stability proof. The stability proof (stable in the sense of Lyapunov) was found for a mobile robot (tilt vehicle) controlled by Feedback Linearization with saturation for the first time. The success tracking result with the promising control signals in the tiltrotor simulator demonstrates the advances of our control method. Also, the Lyapunov candidate and the tracking result in the mobile robot (tilt-car) simulator confirm our deductions of the stability proof. These results reveal that these three challenges in Feedback Linearization are solved, to some extents.Comment: Doctoral Thesis at The University of Toky
    corecore