5,606 research outputs found
An evaluation of DNA-damage response and cell-cycle pathways for breast cancer classification
Accurate subtyping or classification of breast cancer is important for
ensuring proper treatment of patients and also for understanding the molecular
mechanisms driving this disease. While there have been several gene signatures
proposed in the literature to classify breast tumours, these signatures show
very low overlaps, different classification performance, and not much relevance
to the underlying biology of these tumours. Here we evaluate DNA-damage
response (DDR) and cell cycle pathways, which are critical pathways implicated
in a considerable proportion of breast tumours, for their usefulness and
ability in breast tumour subtyping. We think that subtyping breast tumours
based on these two pathways could lead to vital insights into molecular
mechanisms driving these tumours. Here, we performed a systematic evaluation of
DDR and cell-cycle pathways for subtyping of breast tumours into the five known
intrinsic subtypes. Homologous Recombination (HR) pathway showed the best
performance in subtyping breast tumours, indicating that HR genes are strongly
involved in all breast tumours. Comparisons of pathway based signatures and two
standard gene signatures supported the use of known pathways for breast tumour
subtyping. Further, the evaluation of these standard gene signatures showed
that breast tumour subtyping, prognosis and survival estimation are all closely
related. Finally, we constructed an all-inclusive super-signature by combining
(union of) all genes and performing a stringent feature selection, and found it
to be reasonably accurate and robust in classification as well as prognostic
value. Adopting DDR and cell cycle pathways for breast tumour subtyping
achieved robust and accurate breast tumour subtyping, and constructing a
super-signature which contains feature selected mix of genes from these
molecular pathways as well as clinical aspects is valuable in clinical
practice.Comment: 28 pages, 7 figures, 6 table
Multi-omics integration reveals molecular networks and regulators of psoriasis.
BackgroundPsoriasis is a complex multi-factorial disease, involving both genetic susceptibilities and environmental triggers. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have been carried out to identify genetic and epigenetic variants that are associated with psoriasis. However, these loci cannot fully explain the disease pathogenesis.MethodsTo achieve a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of psoriasis, we conducted a systems biology study, integrating multi-omics datasets including GWAS, EWAS, tissue-specific transcriptome, expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), gene networks, and biological pathways to identify the key genes, processes, and networks that are genetically and epigenetically associated with psoriasis risk.ResultsThis integrative genomics study identified both well-characterized (e.g., the IL17 pathway in both GWAS and EWAS) and novel biological processes (e.g., the branched chain amino acid catabolism process in GWAS and the platelet and coagulation pathway in EWAS) involved in psoriasis. Finally, by utilizing tissue-specific gene regulatory networks, we unraveled the interactions among the psoriasis-associated genes and pathways in a tissue-specific manner and detected potential key regulatory genes in the psoriasis networks.ConclusionsThe integration and convergence of multi-omics signals provide deeper and comprehensive insights into the biological mechanisms associated with psoriasis susceptibility
GEOGLE: context mining tool for the correlation between gene expression and the phenotypic distinction
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the post-genomic era, the development of high-throughput gene expression detection technology provides huge amounts of experimental data, which challenges the traditional pipelines for data processing and analyzing in scientific researches.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In our work, we integrated gene expression information from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), biomedical ontology from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and signaling pathway knowledge from sigPathway entries to develop a context mining tool for gene expression analysis – GEOGLE. GEOGLE offers a rapid and convenient way for searching relevant experimental datasets, pathways and biological terms according to multiple types of queries: including biomedical vocabularies, GDS IDs, gene IDs, pathway names and signature list. Moreover, GEOGLE summarizes the signature genes from a subset of GDSes and estimates the correlation between gene expression and the phenotypic distinction with an integrated p value.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This approach performing global searching of expression data may expand the traditional way of collecting heterogeneous gene expression experiment data. GEOGLE is a novel tool that provides researchers a quantitative way to understand the correlation between gene expression and phenotypic distinction through meta-analysis of gene expression datasets from different experiments, as well as the biological meaning behind. The web site and user guide of GEOGLE are available at: <url>http://omics.biosino.org:14000/kweb/workflow.jsp?id=00020</url></p
Stable Feature Selection for Biomarker Discovery
Feature selection techniques have been used as the workhorse in biomarker
discovery applications for a long time. Surprisingly, the stability of feature
selection with respect to sampling variations has long been under-considered.
It is only until recently that this issue has received more and more attention.
In this article, we review existing stable feature selection methods for
biomarker discovery using a generic hierarchal framework. We have two
objectives: (1) providing an overview on this new yet fast growing topic for a
convenient reference; (2) categorizing existing methods under an expandable
framework for future research and development
Integrative computational biology for cancer research
Over the past two decades, high-throughput (HTP) technologies such as microarrays and mass spectrometry have fundamentally changed clinical cancer research. They have revealed novel molecular markers of cancer subtypes, metastasis, and drug sensitivity and resistance. Some have been translated into the clinic as tools for early disease diagnosis, prognosis, and individualized treatment and response monitoring. Despite these successes, many challenges remain: HTP platforms are often noisy and suffer from false positives and false negatives; optimal analysis and successful validation require complex workflows; and great volumes of data are accumulating at a rapid pace. Here we discuss these challenges, and show how integrative computational biology can help diminish them by creating new software tools, analytical methods, and data standards
Defining a robust biological prior from Pathway Analysis to drive Network Inference
Inferring genetic networks from gene expression data is one of the most
challenging work in the post-genomic era, partly due to the vast space of
possible networks and the relatively small amount of data available. In this
field, Gaussian Graphical Model (GGM) provides a convenient framework for the
discovery of biological networks. In this paper, we propose an original
approach for inferring gene regulation networks using a robust biological prior
on their structure in order to limit the set of candidate networks.
Pathways, that represent biological knowledge on the regulatory networks,
will be used as an informative prior knowledge to drive Network Inference. This
approach is based on the selection of a relevant set of genes, called the
"molecular signature", associated with a condition of interest (for instance,
the genes involved in disease development). In this context, differential
expression analysis is a well established strategy. However outcome signatures
are often not consistent and show little overlap between studies. Thus, we will
dedicate the first part of our work to the improvement of the standard process
of biomarker identification to guarantee the robustness and reproducibility of
the molecular signature.
Our approach enables to compare the networks inferred between two conditions
of interest (for instance case and control networks) and help along the
biological interpretation of results. Thus it allows to identify differential
regulations that occur in these conditions. We illustrate the proposed approach
by applying our method to a study of breast cancer's response to treatment
Classification of dendritic cell phenotypes from gene expression data
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The selection of relevant genes for sample classification is a common task in many gene expression studies. Although a number of tools have been developed to identify optimal gene expression signatures, they often generate gene lists that are too long to be exploited clinically. Consequently, researchers in the field try to identify the smallest set of genes that provide good sample classification. We investigated the genome-wide expression of the inflammatory phenotype in dendritic cells. Dendritic cells are a complex group of cells that play a critical role in vertebrate immunity. Therefore, the prediction of the inflammatory phenotype in these cells may help with the selection of immune-modulating compounds.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A data mining protocol was applied to microarray data for murine cell lines treated with various inflammatory stimuli. The learning and validation data sets consisted of 155 and 49 samples, respectively. The data mining protocol reduced the number of probe sets from 5,802 to 10, then from 10 to 6 and finally from 6 to 3. The performances of a set of supervised classification models were compared. The best accuracy, when using the six following genes --Il12b, Cd40, Socs3, Irgm1, Plin2 and Lgals3bp-- was obtained by Tree Augmented Naïve Bayes and Nearest Neighbour (91.8%). Using the smallest set of three genes --Il12b, Cd40 and Socs3-- the performance remained satisfactory and the best accuracy was with Support Vector Machine (95.9%). These data mining models, using data for the genes Il12b, Cd40 and Socs3, were validated with a human data set consisting of 27 samples. Support Vector Machines (71.4%) and Nearest Neighbour (92.6%) gave the worst performances, but the remaining models correctly classified all the 27 samples.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The genes selected by the data mining protocol proposed were shown to be informative for discriminating between inflammatory and steady-state phenotypes in dendritic cells. The robustness of the data mining protocol was confirmed by the accuracy for a human data set, when using only the following three genes: Il12b, Cd40 and Socs3. In summary, we analysed the longitudinal pattern of expression in dendritic cells stimulated with activating agents with the aim of identifying signatures that would predict or explain the dentritic cell response to an inflammatory agent.</p
- …