101 research outputs found

    An algorithmic approach to construct crystallizations of 33-manifolds from presentations of fundamental groups

    Full text link
    We have defined weight of the pair (SR,R)(\langle S \mid R \rangle, R) for a given presentation SR\langle S \mid R \rangle of a group, where the number of generators is equal to the number of relations. We present an algorithm to construct crystallizations of 3-manifolds whose fundamental group has a presentation with two generators and two relations. If the weight of (SR,R)(\langle S \mid R \rangle, R) is nn then our algorithm constructs all the nn-vertex crystallizations which yield (SR,R)(\langle S \mid R \rangle, R). As an application, we have constructed some new crystallizations of 3-manifolds. We have generalized our algorithm for presentations with three generators and certain class of relations. For m3m\geq 3 and mnk2m \geq n \geq k \geq 2, our generalized algorithm gives a 2(2m+2n+2k6+δn2+δk2)2(2m+2n+2k-6+\delta_n^2 + \delta_k^2)-vertex crystallization of the closed connected orientable 33-manifold Mm,n,kM\langle m,n,k \rangle having fundamental group x1,x2,x3x1m=x2n=x3k=x1x2x3\langle x_1,x_2,x_3 \mid x_1^m=x_2^n=x_3^k=x_1x_2x_3 \rangle. These crystallizations are minimal and unique with respect to the given presentations. If `n=2n=2' or `k3k\geq 3 and m4m \geq 4' then our crystallization of Mm,n,kM\langle m,n,k \rangle is vertex-minimal for all the known cases.Comment: 24 pages, 8 figure

    Simple crystallizations of 4-manifolds

    Full text link
    Minimal crystallizations of simply connected PL 4-manifolds are very natural objects. Many of their topological features are reflected in their combinatorial structure which, in addition, is preserved under the connected sum operation. We present a minimal crystallization of the standard PL K3 surface. In combination with known results this yields minimal crystallizations of all simply connected PL 4-manifolds of "standard" type, that is, all connected sums of CP2\mathbb{CP}^2, S2×S2S^2 \times S^2, and the K3 surface. In particular, we obtain minimal crystallizations of a pair of homeomorphic but non-PL-homeomorphic 4-manifolds. In addition, we give an elementary proof that the minimal 8-vertex crystallization of CP2\mathbb{CP}^2 is unique and its associated pseudotriangulation is related to the 9-vertex combinatorial triangulation of CP2\mathbb{CP}^2 by the minimum of four edge contractions.Comment: 23 pages, 7 figures. Minor update, replacement of Figure 7. To appear in Advances in Geometr

    Nonorientable 3-manifolds admitting coloured triangulations with at most 30 tetrahedra

    Full text link
    We present the census of all non-orientable, closed, connected 3-manifolds admitting a rigid crystallization with at most 30 vertices. In order to obtain the above result, we generate, manipulate and compare, by suitable computer procedures, all rigid non-bipartite crystallizations up to 30 vertices.Comment: 18 pages, 3 figure

    A note about complexity of lens spaces

    Get PDF
    Within crystallization theory, (Matveev's) complexity of a 3-manifold can be estimated by means of the combinatorial notion of GM-complexity. In this paper, we prove that the GM-complexity of any lens space L(p,q), with p greater than 2, is bounded by S(p,q)-3, where S(p,q) denotes the sum of all partial quotients in the expansion of q/p as a regular continued fraction. The above upper bound had been already established with regard to complexity; its sharpness was conjectured by Matveev himself and has been recently proved for some infinite families of lens spaces by Jaco, Rubinstein and Tillmann. As a consequence, infinite classes of 3-manifolds turn out to exist, where complexity and GM-complexity coincide. Moreover, we present and briefly analyze results arising from crystallization catalogues up to order 32, which prompt us to conjecture, for any lens space L(p,q) with p greater than 2, the following relation: k(L(p,q)) = 5 + 2 c(L(p,q)), where c(M) denotes the complexity of a 3-manifold M and k(M)+1 is half the minimum order of a crystallization of M.Comment: 14 pages, 2 figures; v2: we improved the paper (changes in Proposition 10; Corollary 9 and Proposition 11 added) taking into account Theorem 2.6 of arxiv:1310.1991v1 which makes use of our Prop. 6(b) (arxiv:1309.5728v1). Minor changes have been done, too, in particular to make references more essentia

    PL 4-manifolds admitting simple crystallizations: framed links and regular genus

    Get PDF
    Simple crystallizations are edge-coloured graphs representing PL 4-manifolds with the property that the 1-skeleton of the associated triangulation equals the 1-skeleton of a 4-simplex. In the present paper, we prove that any (simply-connected) PL 44-manifold MM admitting a simple crystallization admits a special handlebody decomposition, too; equivalently, MM may be represented by a framed link yielding S3\mathbb S^3, with exactly β2(M)\beta_2(M) components (β2(M)\beta_2(M) being the second Betti number of MM). As a consequence, the regular genus of MM is proved to be the double of β2(M)\beta_2(M). Moreover, the characterization of any such PL 44-manifold by k(M)=3β2(M)k(M)= 3 \beta_2(M), where k(M)k(M) is the gem-complexity of MM (i.e. the non-negative number p1p-1, 2p2p being the minimum order of a crystallization of MM) implies that both PL invariants gem-complexity and regular genus turn out to be additive within the class of all PL 44-manifolds admitting simple crystallizations (in particular: within the class of all "standard" simply-connected PL 4-manifolds).Comment: 14 pages, no figures; this is a new version of the former paper "A characterization of PL 4-manifolds admitting simple crystallizations

    Lower bounds for regular genus and gem-complexity of PL 4-manifolds

    Get PDF
    Within crystallization theory, two interesting PL invariants for dd-manifolds have been introduced and studied, namely {\it gem-complexity} and {\it regular genus}. In the present paper we prove that, for any closed connected PL 44-manifold MM, its gem-complexity k(M)\mathit{k}(M) and its regular genus G(M) \mathcal G(M) satisfy: k(M)  3χ(M)+10m6   and   G(M)  2χ(M)+5m4,\mathit{k}(M) \ \geq \ 3 \chi (M) + 10m -6 \ \ \ \text{and} \ \ \ \mathcal G(M) \ \geq \ 2 \chi (M) + 5m -4, where rk(π1(M))=m.rk(\pi_1(M))=m. These lower bounds enable to strictly improve previously known estimations for regular genus and gem-complexity of product 4-manifolds. Moreover, the class of {\it semi-simple crystallizations} is introduced, so that the represented PL 4-manifolds attain the above lower bounds. The additivity of both gem-complexity and regular genus with respect to connected sum is also proved for such a class of PL 4-manifolds, which comprehends all ones of "standard type", involved in existing crystallization catalogues, and their connected sums.Comment: 17 pages, 3 figures. To appear in Forum Mathematicu

    Complexity computation for compact 3-manifolds via crystallizations and Heegaard diagrams

    Get PDF
    The idea of computing Matveev complexity by using Heegaard decompositions has been recently developed by two different approaches: the first one for closed 3-manifolds via crystallization theory, yielding the notion of Gem-Matveev complexity; the other one for compact orientable 3-manifolds via generalized Heegaard diagrams, yielding the notion of modified Heegaard complexity. In this paper we extend to the non-orientable case the definition of modified Heegaard complexity and prove that for closed 3-manifolds Gem-Matveev complexity and modified Heegaard complexity coincide. Hence, they turn out to be useful different tools to compute the same upper bound for Matveev complexity.Comment: 12 pages; accepted for publication in Topology and Its Applications, volume containing Proceedings of Prague Toposym 201

    Cataloguing PL 4-manifolds by gem-complexity

    Get PDF
    We describe an algorithm to subdivide automatically a given set of PL n-manifolds (via coloured triangulations or, equivalently, via crystallizations) into classes whose elements are PL-homeomorphic. The algorithm, implemented in the case n=4, succeeds to solve completely the PL-homeomorphism problem among the catalogue of all closed connected PL 4-manifolds up to gem-complexity 8 (i.e., which admit a coloured triangulation with at most 18 4-simplices). Possible interactions with the (not completely known) relationship among different classification in TOP and DIFF=PL categories are also investigated. As a first consequence of the above PL classification, the non-existence of exotic PL 4-manifolds up to gem-complexity 8 is proved. Further applications of the tool are described, related to possible PL-recognition of different triangulations of the K3-surface.Comment: 25 pages, 5 figures. Improvements suggested by the refere
    corecore