7,249 research outputs found
TID Hash Joins
TID hash joins are a simple and memory-efficient method for processing large join queries. They are based on standard hash join algorithms but only store TID/key pairs in the hash table instead of entire tuples. This typically reduces memory requirements by more than an order of magnitude bringing substantial benefits. In particular, performance for joins on Giga-Byte relations can substantially be
improved by reducing the amount of disk I/O to a large extent. Furthermore efficient processing of mixed multi-user workloads consisting of both join queries and OLTP transactions is supported. We present a detailed simulation study to analyze the performance of TID hash joins. In particular, we identify the conditions under which TID hash joins are most beneficial. Furthermore, we compare TID hash join with adaptive hash join algorithms that have been proposed to deal with mixed workloads
Forecasting the cost of processing multi-join queries via hashing for main-memory databases (Extended version)
Database management systems (DBMSs) carefully optimize complex multi-join
queries to avoid expensive disk I/O. As servers today feature tens or hundreds
of gigabytes of RAM, a significant fraction of many analytic databases becomes
memory-resident. Even after careful tuning for an in-memory environment, a
linear disk I/O model such as the one implemented in PostgreSQL may make query
response time predictions that are up to 2X slower than the optimal multi-join
query plan over memory-resident data. This paper introduces a memory I/O cost
model to identify good evaluation strategies for complex query plans with
multiple hash-based equi-joins over memory-resident data. The proposed cost
model is carefully validated for accuracy using three different systems,
including an Amazon EC2 instance, to control for hardware-specific differences.
Prior work in parallel query evaluation has advocated right-deep and bushy
trees for multi-join queries due to their greater parallelization and
pipelining potential. A surprising finding is that the conventional wisdom from
shared-nothing disk-based systems does not directly apply to the modern
shared-everything memory hierarchy. As corroborated by our model, the
performance gap between the optimal left-deep and right-deep query plan can
grow to about 10X as the number of joins in the query increases.Comment: 15 pages, 8 figures, extended version of the paper to appear in
SoCC'1
Massively Parallel Sort-Merge Joins in Main Memory Multi-Core Database Systems
Two emerging hardware trends will dominate the database system technology in
the near future: increasing main memory capacities of several TB per server and
massively parallel multi-core processing. Many algorithmic and control
techniques in current database technology were devised for disk-based systems
where I/O dominated the performance. In this work we take a new look at the
well-known sort-merge join which, so far, has not been in the focus of research
in scalable massively parallel multi-core data processing as it was deemed
inferior to hash joins. We devise a suite of new massively parallel sort-merge
(MPSM) join algorithms that are based on partial partition-based sorting.
Contrary to classical sort-merge joins, our MPSM algorithms do not rely on a
hard to parallelize final merge step to create one complete sort order. Rather
they work on the independently created runs in parallel. This way our MPSM
algorithms are NUMA-affine as all the sorting is carried out on local memory
partitions. An extensive experimental evaluation on a modern 32-core machine
with one TB of main memory proves the competitive performance of MPSM on large
main memory databases with billions of objects. It scales (almost) linearly in
the number of employed cores and clearly outperforms competing hash join
proposals - in particular it outperforms the "cutting-edge" Vectorwise parallel
query engine by a factor of four.Comment: VLDB201
- …