40,248 research outputs found
User Assignment with Distributed Large Intelligent Surface (LIS) Systems
In this paper, we consider a wireless communication system where a large
intelligent surface (LIS) is deployed comprising a number of small and
distributed LIS-Units. Each LIS-Unit has a separate signal process unit (SPU)
and is connected to a central process unit (CPU) that coordinates the behaviors
of all the LIS-Units. With such a LIS system, we consider the user assignments
both for sum-rate and minimal user-rate maximizations. That is, assuming
LIS-Units deployed in the LIS system, the objective is to select
() best LIS-Units to serve autonomous users simultaneously.
Based on the nice property of effective inter-user interference suppression of
the LIS-Units, the optimal user assignments can be effectively found through
classical linear assignment problems (LAPs) defined on a bipartite graph. To be
specific, the optimal user assignment for sum-rate and user-rate maximizations
can be solved by linear sum assignment problem (LSAP) and linear bottleneck
assignment problem (LBAP), respectively. The elements of the cost matrix are
constructed based on the received signal strength (RSS) measured at each of the
LIS-Units for all the users. Numerical results show that, the proposed
user assignments are close to optimal user assignments both under line-of-sight
(LoS) and scattering environments.Comment: submitted to IEEE conference; 6 pages;10 figure
An Atypical Survey of Typical-Case Heuristic Algorithms
Heuristic approaches often do so well that they seem to pretty much always
give the right answer. How close can heuristic algorithms get to always giving
the right answer, without inducing seismic complexity-theoretic consequences?
This article first discusses how a series of results by Berman, Buhrman,
Hartmanis, Homer, Longpr\'{e}, Ogiwara, Sch\"{o}ening, and Watanabe, from the
early 1970s through the early 1990s, explicitly or implicitly limited how well
heuristic algorithms can do on NP-hard problems. In particular, many desirable
levels of heuristic success cannot be obtained unless severe, highly unlikely
complexity class collapses occur. Second, we survey work initiated by Goldreich
and Wigderson, who showed how under plausible assumptions deterministic
heuristics for randomized computation can achieve a very high frequency of
correctness. Finally, we consider formal ways in which theory can help explain
the effectiveness of heuristics that solve NP-hard problems in practice.Comment: This article is currently scheduled to appear in the December 2012
issue of SIGACT New
Recommended from our members
Using Experiments to Foster Innovation and Improve the Effectiveness of Energy Efficiency Programs
This paper argues that the establishment of a process designed to manage innovation must be developed in California to foster the creation of needed program improvements and develop new and more effective energy efficiency delivery programs. This paper discusses several key institutional problems that must be overcome to achieve significant progress
Making Medical Homes Work: Moving From Concept to Practice
Explores practical considerations for implementing a medical home program of physician practices committed to coordinating and integrating care based on patient needs and priorities, such as how to qualify medical homes and how to match patients to them
- …