Repairing Inconsistent XML Write-Access Control Policies

XML access control policies involving updates may contain security flaws, here called inconsistencies, in which a forbidden operation may be simulated by performing a sequence of allowed operations. This paper investigates the problem of deciding whether a policy is consistent, and if not, how its inconsistencies can be repaired. We consider policies expressed in terms of annotated DTDs defining which operations are allowed or denied for the XML trees that are instances of the DTD. We show that consistency is decidable in PTIME for such policies and that consistent partial policies can be extended to unique "least-privilege" consistent total policies. We also consider repair problems based on deleting privileges to restore consistency, show that finding minimal repairs is NP-complete, and give heuristics for finding repairs.Comment: 25 pages. To appear in Proceedings of DBPL 200

Computer theorem proving in math

We give an overview of issues surrounding computer-verified theorem proving in the standard pure-mathematical context. This is based on my talk at the PQR conference (Brussels, June 2003)

MUS-Based Partitioning for Inconsistency Measures

National audienceMesurer le degré d'incohérence des bases de connaissances permet aux agents une meilleur compréhension de leur environnement. Différentes approches sémantiques et syntaxiques ont été proposées pour quantifier l'incohérence. Dans ce papier, nous proposons d'analyser les limites des approches existantes. Tout d'abord, nous explorons la propriété logique d'additivité en considérant les composantes connexes du graphe représentant les bases de connaissances. Ensuite, nous montrons comment la structure de ce graphe peut être prise en compte pour identifier d'une manière plus fine la responsabilité de chaque formule dans l'incohérence. Finalement, nous étendons notre approche pour fournir une mesure d'incohérence de la base entière en satisfaisant des propriétés définies

A measure of rationality and welfare

There is evidence showing that individual behavior often deviates from the classical principle of maximization. This evidence raises at least two important questions: (i) how severe the deviations are and (ii) which method is the best for extracting relevant information from choice behavior for the purposes of welfare analysis. In this paper we address these two questions by identifying from a foundational analysis a new measure of the rationality of individuals that enables the analysis of individual welfare in potentially inconsistent subjects, all based on standard revealed preference data. We call such measure minimal index.Rationality; Individual Welfare; Revealed Preference.