15,106 research outputs found
Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media
Social media are used as main discussion channels by millions of individuals
every day. The content individuals produce in daily social-media-based
micro-communications, and the emotions therein expressed, may impact the
emotional states of others. A recent experiment performed on Facebook
hypothesized that emotions spread online, even in absence of non-verbal cues
typical of in-person interactions, and that individuals are more likely to
adopt positive or negative emotions if these are over-expressed in their social
network. Experiments of this type, however, raise ethical concerns, as they
require massive-scale content manipulation with unknown consequences for the
individuals therein involved. Here, we study the dynamics of emotional
contagion using Twitter. Rather than manipulating content, we devise a null
model that discounts some confounding factors (including the effect of
emotional contagion). We measure the emotional valence of content the users are
exposed to before posting their own tweets. We determine that on average a
negative post follows an over-exposure to 4.34% more negative content than
baseline, while positive posts occur after an average over-exposure to 4.50%
more positive contents. We highlight the presence of a linear relationship
between the average emotional valence of the stimuli users are exposed to, and
that of the responses they produce. We also identify two different classes of
individuals: highly and scarcely susceptible to emotional contagion. Highly
susceptible users are significantly less inclined to adopt negative emotions
than the scarcely susceptible ones, but equally likely to adopt positive
emotions. In general, the likelihood of adopting positive emotions is much
greater than that of negative emotions.Comment: 10 pages, 5 figure
Surveilling COVID-19 Emotional Contagion on Twitter by Sentiment Analysis
BACKGROUND: The fight against the COVID-19 pandemic seems to encompass a social media debate, possibly resulting in emotional contagion and the need for novel surveillance approaches. In the current study, we aimed to examine the flow and content of tweets, exploring the role of COVID-19 key events on the popular Twitter platform. METHODS: Using representative freely available data, we performed a focused, social media-based analysis to capture COVID-19 discussions on Twitter, considering sentiment and longitudinal trends between January 19 and March 3, 2020. Different populations of users were considered. Core discussions were explored measuring tweetsâ sentiment, by both computing a polarity compound score with 95% Confidence Interval and using a transformer-based model, pretrained on a large corpus of COVID-19-related Tweets. Context-dependent meaning and emotion-specific features were considered. RESULTS: We gathered 3,308,476 tweets written in English. Since the first World Health Organization report (January 21), negative sentiment proportion of tweets gradually increased as expected, with amplifications following key events. Sentiment scores were increasingly negative among most active users. Tweets content and flow revealed an ongoing scenario in which the global emergency seems difficult to be emotionally managed, as shown by sentiment trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating social media like Twitter as essential surveillance tools in the management of the pandemic and its waves might actually represent a novel preventive approach to hinder emotional contagion, disseminating reliable information and nurturing trust. There is the need to monitor and sustain healthy behaviors as well as community supports also via social media-based preventive interventions
Spreading in Social Systems: Reflections
In this final chapter, we consider the state-of-the-art for spreading in
social systems and discuss the future of the field. As part of this reflection,
we identify a set of key challenges ahead. The challenges include the following
questions: how can we improve the quality, quantity, extent, and accessibility
of datasets? How can we extract more information from limited datasets? How can
we take individual cognition and decision making processes into account? How
can we incorporate other complexity of the real contagion processes? Finally,
how can we translate research into positive real-world impact? In the
following, we provide more context for each of these open questions.Comment: 7 pages, chapter to appear in "Spreading Dynamics in Social Systems";
Eds. Sune Lehmann and Yong-Yeol Ahn, Springer Natur
Guide to the Networked Minds Social Presence Inventory v. 1.2
This document introduces the Networked\ud
Minds Social Presence Inventory. The\ud
inventory is a self-report measure of social\ud
presence, which is commonly defined as the\ud
sense of being together with another in a\ud
mediated environment. The guidelines\ud
provide background on the use of the social\ud
presence scales in studies of usersâ social\ud
communication and interaction with other\ud
humans or with artificially intelligent agents\ud
in virtual environments
Happiness is assortative in online social networks
Social networks tend to disproportionally favor connections between
individuals with either similar or dissimilar characteristics. This propensity,
referred to as assortative mixing or homophily, is expressed as the correlation
between attribute values of nearest neighbour vertices in a graph. Recent
results indicate that beyond demographic features such as age, sex and race,
even psychological states such as "loneliness" can be assortative in a social
network. In spite of the increasing societal importance of online social
networks it is unknown whether assortative mixing of psychological states takes
place in situations where social ties are mediated solely by online networking
services in the absence of physical contact. Here, we show that general
happiness or Subjective Well-Being (SWB) of Twitter users, as measured from a 6
month record of their individual tweets, is indeed assortative across the
Twitter social network. To our knowledge this is the first result that shows
assortative mixing in online networks at the level of SWB. Our results imply
that online social networks may be equally subject to the social mechanisms
that cause assortative mixing in real social networks and that such assortative
mixing takes place at the level of SWB. Given the increasing prevalence of
online social networks, their propensity to connect users with similar levels
of SWB may be an important instrument in better understanding how both positive
and negative sentiments spread through online social ties. Future research may
focus on how event-specific mood states can propagate and influence user
behavior in "real life".Comment: 17 pages, 9 figure
In pursuit of satisfaction and the prevention of embarrassment : affective state in group recommender systems
Peer reviewedPostprin
- âŠ