What is the best way for extracting meaningful attributes from pictures?

Automatic attribute discovery methods have gained in popularity to extract sets of visual attributes from images or videos for various tasks. Despite their good performance in some classification tasks, it is difficult to evaluate whether the attributes discovered by these methods are meaningful and which methods are the most appropriate to discover attributes for visual descriptions. In its simplest form, such an evaluation can be performed by manually verifying whether there is any consistent identifiable visual concept distinguishing between positive and negative exemplars labelled by an attribute. This manual checking is tedious, expensive and labour intensive. In addition, comparisons between different methods could also be problematic as it is not clear how one could quantitatively decide which attribute is more meaningful than the others. In this paper, we propose a novel attribute meaningfulness metric to address this challenging problem. With this metric, automatic quantitative evaluation can be performed on the attribute sets; thus, reducing the enormous effort to perform manual evaluation. The proposed metric is applied to some recent automatic attribute discovery and hashing methods on four attribute-labelled datasets. To further validate the efficacy of the proposed method, we conducted a user study. In addition, we also compared our metric with a semi-supervised attribute discover method using the mixture of probabilistic PCA. In our evaluation, we gleaned several insights that could be beneficial in developing new automatic attribute discovery methods

Goal Driven Discovery of Distributional Differences via Language Descriptions

Mining large corpora can generate useful discoveries but is time-consuming for humans. We formulate a new task, D5, that automatically discovers differences between two large corpora in a goal-driven way. The task input is a problem comprising a research goal "$\textit{comparing the side effects of drug A and drug B}$" and a corpus pair (two large collections of patients' self-reported reactions after taking each drug). The output is a language description (discovery) of how these corpora differ (patients taking drug A "$\textit{mention feelings of paranoia}$" more often). We build a D5 system, and to quantitatively measure its performance, we 1) contribute a meta-dataset, OpenD5, aggregating 675 open-ended problems ranging across business, social sciences, humanities, machine learning, and health, and 2) propose a set of unified evaluation metrics: validity, relevance, novelty, and significance. With the dataset and the unified metrics, we confirm that language models can use the goals to propose more relevant, novel, and significant candidate discoveries. Finally, our system produces discoveries previously unknown to the authors on a wide range of applications in OpenD5, including temporal and demographic differences in discussion topics, political stances and stereotypes in speech, insights in commercial reviews, and error patterns in NLP models

Unsupervised automatic attribute discovery method via multi-graph clustering

Recently, various automated attribute discovery methods have been developed to discover useful visual attributes from a given set of images. Despite the progress made, most methods consider the supervised scenario which assumes the existence of labelled data. Recent results suggest that it is possible to discover attributes from a set of unlabelled data. In this work, we propose a novel unsupervised attribute discovery method utilising multi-graph approach that preserves both local neighbourhood structure as well as class separability. Whilst, the local neighbourhood structure is preserved by considering multiple similarity graphs, the class separability is achieved by incorporating the traditional clustering objective. For evaluation, we first investigate the performance of the proposed approach to address a clustering task. Then we apply our proposed method to automatically discover visual attributes and compare with various automatic attribute discovery and hashing methods. The results show that our proposed method is able to improve the performance in the clustering task. Furthermore, when evaluated using the recent meaningfulness metric, the proposed method outperforms the other unsupervised attribute discovery methods

Automatic and quantitative evaluation of attribute discovery methods

Many automatic attribute discovery methods have been developed to extract a set of visual attributes from images for various tasks. However, despite good performance in some image classification tasks, it is difficult to evaluate whether these methods discover meaningful attributes and which one is the best to find the attributes for image descriptions. An intuitive way to evaluate this is to manually verify whether consistent identifiable visual concepts exist to distinguish between positive and negative images of an attribute. This manual checking is tedious, labor intensive and expensive and it is very hard to get quantitative comparisons between different methods. In this work, we tackle this problem by proposing an attribute meaningfulness metric, that can perform automatic evaluation on the meaningful-ness of attribute sets as well as achieving quantitative comparisons. We apply our proposed metric to recent automatic attribute discovery methods and popular hashing methods on three attribute datasets. A user study is also conducted to validate the effectiveness of the metric. In our evaluation, we gleaned some insights that could be beneficial in developing automatic attribute discovery methods to generate meaningful attributes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to quantitatively measure the semantic content of automatically discovered attributes

Automatic and quantitative evaluation of attribute discovery methods

Many automatic attribute discovery methods have been developed to extract a set of visual attributes from images for various tasks. However, despite good performance in some image classification tasks, it is difficult to evaluate whether these methods discover meaningful attributes and which one is the best to find the attributes for image descriptions. An intuitive way to evaluate this is to manually verify whether consistent identifiable visual concepts exist to distinguish between positive and negative images of an attribute. This manual checking is tedious, labor intensive and expensive and it is very hard to get quantitative comparisons between different methods. In this work, we tackle this problem by proposing an attribute meaningfulness metric, that can perform automatic evaluation on the meaningful-ness of attribute sets as well as achieving quantitative comparisons. We apply our proposed metric to recent automatic attribute discovery methods and popular hashing methods on three attribute datasets. A user study is also conducted to validate the effectiveness of the metric. In our evaluation, we gleaned some insights that could be beneficial in developing automatic attribute discovery methods to generate meaningful attributes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to quantitatively measure the semantic content of automatically discovered attributes