4,665 research outputs found
Mathematical programming embeddings of logic
"February 20th, 1998"--T.p. -- "June, 1998"--Cover.Includes bibliographical references (p. 21-23).Supported in part by the U.S. Army. DAAL03-92-G-0115 Supported in part by a Center for Intelligent Control Systems grant from Siemens AG.Vivek S. Borker ... [et al.
The Gödel and the Splitting Translations
When the new research area of logic programming and non-monotonic reasoning emerged at the end of the 1980s, it focused notably on the study of mathematical relations between different non-monotonic formalisms, especially between the semantics of stable models and various non-monotonic modal logics. Given the many and varied embeddings of stable models into systems of modal logic, the modal interpretation of logic programming connectives and rules became the dominant view until well into the new century. Recently, modal interpretations are once again receiving attention in the context of hybrid theories that combine reasoning with non-monotonic rules and ontologies or external knowledge bases. In this talk I explain how familiar embeddings of stable models into modal logics can be seen as special cases of two translations that are very well-known in non-classical logic. They are, first, the translation used by Godel in 1933 to em- ¨ bed Heyting’s intuitionistic logic H into a modal provability logic equivalent to Lewis’s S4; second, the splitting translation, known since the mid-1970s, that allows one to embed extensions of S4 into extensions of the non-reflexive logic, K4. By composing the two translations one can obtain (Goldblatt, 1978) an adequate provability interpretation of H within the Goedel-Loeb logic GL, the system shown by Solovay (1976) to capture precisely the provability predicate of Peano Arithmetic. These two translations and their composition not only apply to monotonic logics extending H and S4, they also apply in several relevant cases to non-monotonic logics built upon such extensions, including equilibrium logic, non-monotonic S4F and autoepistemic logic. The embeddings obtained are not merely faithful and modular, they are based on fully recursive translations applicable to arbitrary logical formulas. Besides providing a uniform picture of some older results in LPNMR, the translations yield a perspective from which some new logics of belief emerge in a natural wa
Graph Representations for Higher-Order Logic and Theorem Proving
This paper presents the first use of graph neural networks (GNNs) for
higher-order proof search and demonstrates that GNNs can improve upon
state-of-the-art results in this domain. Interactive, higher-order theorem
provers allow for the formalization of most mathematical theories and have been
shown to pose a significant challenge for deep learning. Higher-order logic is
highly expressive and, even though it is well-structured with a clearly defined
grammar and semantics, there still remains no well-established method to
convert formulas into graph-based representations. In this paper, we consider
several graphical representations of higher-order logic and evaluate them
against the HOList benchmark for higher-order theorem proving
Embedding Non-Ground Logic Programs into Autoepistemic Logic for Knowledge Base Combination
In the context of the Semantic Web, several approaches to the combination of
ontologies, given in terms of theories of classical first-order logic and rule
bases, have been proposed. They either cast rules into classical logic or limit
the interaction between rules and ontologies. Autoepistemic logic (AEL) is an
attractive formalism which allows to overcome these limitations, by serving as
a uniform host language to embed ontologies and nonmonotonic logic programs
into it. For the latter, so far only the propositional setting has been
considered. In this paper, we present three embeddings of normal and three
embeddings of disjunctive non-ground logic programs under the stable model
semantics into first-order AEL. While the embeddings all correspond with
respect to objective ground atoms, differences arise when considering
non-atomic formulas and combinations with first-order theories. We compare the
embeddings with respect to stable expansions and autoepistemic consequences,
considering the embeddings by themselves, as well as combinations with
classical theories. Our results reveal differences and correspondences of the
embeddings and provide useful guidance in the choice of a particular embedding
for knowledge combination.Comment: 52 pages, submitte
Synthetic Quantum Systems
So far proposed quantum computers use fragile and environmentally sensitive
natural quantum systems. Here we explore the new notion that synthetic quantum
systems suitable for quantum computation may be fabricated from smart
nanostructures using topological excitations of a stochastic neural-type
network that can mimic natural quantum systems. These developments are a
technological application of process physics which is an information theory of
reality in which space and quantum phenomena are emergent, and so indicates the
deep origins of quantum phenomena. Analogous complex stochastic dynamical
systems have recently been proposed within neurobiology to deal with the
emergent complexity of biosystems, particularly the biodynamics of higher brain
function. The reasons for analogous discoveries in fundamental physics and
neurobiology are discussed.Comment: 16 pages, Latex, 1 eps figure fil
Smart Nanostructures and Synthetic Quantum Systems
So far proposed quantum computers use fragile and environmentally sensitive
natural quantum systems. Here we explore the notion that synthetic quantum
systems suitable for quantum computation may be fabricated from smart
nanostructures using topological excitations of a neural-type network that can
mimic natural quantum systems. These developments are a technological
application of process physics which is a semantic information theory of
reality in which space and quantum phenomena are emergent.Comment: LaTex,14 pages 1 eps file. To be published in BioMEMS and Smart
Nanostructures, Proceedings of SPIE Conference #4590, ed. L. B. Kis
Computable decision making on the reals and other spaces via partiality and nondeterminism
Though many safety-critical software systems use floating point to represent
real-world input and output, programmers usually have idealized versions in
mind that compute with real numbers. Significant deviations from the ideal can
cause errors and jeopardize safety. Some programming systems implement exact
real arithmetic, which resolves this matter but complicates others, such as
decision making. In these systems, it is impossible to compute (total and
deterministic) discrete decisions based on connected spaces such as
. We present programming-language semantics based on constructive
topology with variants allowing nondeterminism and/or partiality. Either
nondeterminism or partiality suffices to allow computable decision making on
connected spaces such as . We then introduce pattern matching on
spaces, a language construct for creating programs on spaces, generalizing
pattern matching in functional programming, where patterns need not represent
decidable predicates and also may overlap or be inexhaustive, giving rise to
nondeterminism or partiality, respectively. Nondeterminism and/or partiality
also yield formal logics for constructing approximate decision procedures. We
implemented these constructs in the Marshall language for exact real
arithmetic.Comment: This is an extended version of a paper due to appear in the
proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS) in
July 201
On Various Negative Translations
Several proof translations of classical mathematics into intuitionistic
mathematics have been proposed in the literature over the past century. These
are normally referred to as negative translations or double-negation
translations. Among those, the most commonly cited are translations due to
Kolmogorov, Godel, Gentzen, Kuroda and Krivine (in chronological order). In
this paper we propose a framework for explaining how these different
translations are related to each other. More precisely, we define a notion of a
(modular) simplification starting from Kolmogorov translation, which leads to a
partial order between different negative translations. In this derived
ordering, Kuroda and Krivine are minimal elements. Two new minimal translations
are introduced, with Godel and Gentzen translations sitting in between
Kolmogorov and one of these new translations.Comment: In Proceedings CL&C 2010, arXiv:1101.520
- …