1,221 research outputs found
Cutset Sampling for Bayesian Networks
The paper presents a new sampling methodology for Bayesian networks that
samples only a subset of variables and applies exact inference to the rest.
Cutset sampling is a network structure-exploiting application of the
Rao-Blackwellisation principle to sampling in Bayesian networks. It improves
convergence by exploiting memory-based inference algorithms. It can also be
viewed as an anytime approximation of the exact cutset-conditioning algorithm
developed by Pearl. Cutset sampling can be implemented efficiently when the
sampled variables constitute a loop-cutset of the Bayesian network and, more
generally, when the induced width of the networks graph conditioned on the
observed sampled variables is bounded by a constant w. We demonstrate
empirically the benefit of this scheme on a range of benchmarks
On Similarities between Inference in Game Theory and Machine Learning
In this paper, we elucidate the equivalence between inference in game theory and machine learning. Our aim in so doing is to establish an equivalent vocabulary between the two domains so as to facilitate developments at the intersection of both fields, and as proof of the usefulness of this approach, we use recent developments in each field to make useful improvements to the other. More specifically, we consider the analogies between smooth best responses in fictitious play and Bayesian inference methods. Initially, we use these insights to develop and demonstrate an improved algorithm for learning in games based on probabilistic moderation. That is, by integrating over the distribution of opponent strategies (a Bayesian approach within machine learning) rather than taking a simple empirical average (the approach used in standard fictitious play) we derive a novel moderated fictitious play algorithm and show that it is more likely than standard fictitious play to converge to a payoff-dominant but risk-dominated Nash equilibrium in a simple coordination game. Furthermore we consider the converse case, and show how insights from game theory can be used to derive two improved mean field variational learning algorithms. We first show that the standard update rule of mean field variational learning is analogous to a Cournot adjustment within game theory. By analogy with fictitious play, we then suggest an improved update rule, and show that this results in fictitious variational play, an improved mean field variational learning algorithm that exhibits better convergence in highly or strongly connected graphical models. Second, we use a recent advance in fictitious play, namely dynamic fictitious play, to derive a derivative action variational learning algorithm, that exhibits superior convergence properties on a canonical machine learning problem (clustering a mixture distribution)
- ā¦