Characterizing the strongly jump-traceable sets via randomness

We show that if a set $A$ is computable from every superlow 1-random set, then $A$ is strongly jump-traceable. This theorem shows that the computably enumerable (c.e.) strongly jump-traceable sets are exactly the c.e.\ sets computable from every superlow 1-random set. We also prove the analogous result for superhighness: a c.e.\ set is strongly jump-traceable if and only if it is computable from every superhigh 1-random set. Finally, we show that for each cost function $c$ with the limit condition there is a 1-random $\Delta^0_2$ set $Y$ such that every c.e.\ set $A \le_T Y$ obeys $c$. To do so, we connect cost function strength and the strength of randomness notions. This result gives a full correspondence between obedience of cost functions and being computable from $\Delta^0_2$ 1-random sets.Comment: 41 page

Lowness notions, measure and domination

We show that positive measure domination implies uniform almost everywhere domination and that this proof translates into a proof in the subsystem WWKL$_0$ (but not in RCA$_0$) of the equivalence of various Lebesgue measure regularity statements introduced by Dobrinen and Simpson. This work also allows us to prove that low for weak $2$-randomness is the same as low for Martin-L\"of randomness (a result independently obtained by Nies). Using the same technique, we show that $\leq_{LR}$ implies $\leq_{LK}$, generalizing the fact that low for Martin-L\"of randomness implies low for $K$

Calibrating the complexity of Delta 2 sets via their changes

The computational complexity of a Delta 2 set will be calibrated by the amount of changes needed for any of its computable approximations. Firstly, we study Martin-Loef random sets, where we quantify the changes of initial segments. Secondly, we look at c.e. sets, where we quantify the overall amount of changes by obedience to cost functions. Finally, we combine the two settings. The discussions lead to three basic principles on how complexity and changes relate

Randomness and lowness notions via open covers

One of the main lines of research in algorithmic randomness is that of lowness notions. Given a randomness notion R, we ask for which sequences A does relativization to A leave R unchanged (i.e., R^A = R)? Such sequences are call low for R. This question extends to a pair of randomness notions R and S, where S is weaker: for which A is S^A still weaker than R? In the last few years, many results have characterized the sequences that are low for randomness by their low computational strength. A few results have also given measure-theoretic characterizations of low sequences. For example, Kjos-Hanssen proved that A is low for Martin-L\"of randomness if and only if every A-c.e. open set of measure less than 1 can be covered by a c.e. open set of measure less than 1. In this paper, we give a series of results showing that a wide variety of lowness notions can be expressed in a similar way, i.e., via the ability to cover open sets of a certain type by open sets of some other type. This provides a unified framework that clarifies the study of lowness for randomness notions, and allows us to give simple proofs of a number of known results. We also use this framework to prove new results, including showing that the classes Low(MLR;SR) and Low(W2R;SR) coincide, answering a question of Nies. Other applications include characterizations of highness notions, a broadly applicable explanation for why low for randomness is the same as low for tests, and a simple proof that Low(W2R;S)=Low(MLR;S), where S is the class of Martin-L\"of, computable, or Schnorr random sequences. The final section gives characterizations of lowness notions using summable functions and convergent measure machines instead of open covers. We finish with a simple proof of a result of Nies, that Low(MLR) = Low(MLR; CR).Comment: This is a revised version of the APAL paper. In particular, a full proof of Proposition 24 is adde