6 research outputs found

    A Data Compress Scheme for Maximizing Sensing Data in Solar-powered Sensor Networks

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2015. 8. ์‹ ํ˜„์‹.๋ฌด์„  ์„ผ์„œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋Š” ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜ ๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์ฃผ ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ค„์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด๋Š” ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ ํƒœ์–‘์—๋„ˆ ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์„ผ์„œ ๋…ธ๋“œ๋Š” ํƒœ์–‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋ถ„์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์„ผ์„œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์„œ๋น„์Šค ํ’ˆ์งˆ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š”๋ฐ ์ด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์•• ์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ค„์—ฌ ์ „์†ก์— ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ค„ ์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํƒœ์–‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์—ฌ๋ถ„์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์™€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์•• ์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ ˆ์•ฝ๋˜๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋Š˜๋ ค ์‹œ๊ฐ„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์€ ์••์ถ•๋ฅ ๊ณผ ์••์ถ• ์†Œ๋ชจ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์••์ถ• ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์„ผ ์„œ ๋…ธ๋“œ์˜ ๋‚จ์€ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€, ํƒœ์–‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋˜๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€, ์„ผ์„œ ๋…ธ๋“œ ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ ํƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์—ฌ๋ถ„์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋†’์€ ์••์ถ•๋ฅ ์—์„œ ์งง์€ ์„ผ์‹ฑ์ฃผ๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์–‘์„ ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๋„๋ก ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์••์ถ•๋ฅ ์˜ ์••์ถ• ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๋งŒ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์•ฝ 7.8%์ •๋„์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋” ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” 7.8% ๋” ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€์Œ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค.์š”์•ฝ i ๋ชฉ์ฐจ ii ๊ทธ๋ฆผ ๋ชฉ์ฐจ iv ํ‘œ ๋ชฉ์ฐจ iv 1. ์„œ๋ก  1 1.1 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋™๊ธฐ 1 1.2 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์  ๋ฐ ๊ฐœ์š” 2 1.3 ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 4 2. ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ์ง€์‹ ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ จ์—ฐ๊ตฌ 5 2.1 ๋ฌด์„  ์„ผ์„œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ 5 2.2 ๋ฌด์„  ์„ผ์„œ๋…ธ๋“œ์™€ ์‹ฑํฌ๋…ธ๋“œ์˜ ํŠน์ง• 6 2.3 ์„ผ์„œ๋…ธ๋“œ์—์„œ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์••์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• 7 2.4 ํƒœ์–‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฌด์„  ์„ผ์„œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ 8 3. ์ ์‘์  ์••์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• 11 3.1 ์ ์‘์  ์••์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ๊ฐœ์š” 11 3.2 ์••์ถ• ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ 12 3.3 ๋…ธ๋“œ์˜ ๋™์ž‘ 15 3.4 ๋™์ž‘๋ชจ๋“œ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ • 16 3.5 ๋ฌธํ„ฑ๊ฐ’์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ • 18 3.6 ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ • 20 4. ์‹คํ—˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 22 4.1 ์‹คํ—˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ 22 4.2 ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 25 5. ๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋ฐ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ 30 ์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ 31 Abstract 36Maste

    Power Adaptive Data Encryption for Energy-Efficient and Secure Communication in Solar-Powered Wireless Sensor Networks

    Get PDF
    Basic security of data transmission in battery-powered wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is typically achieved by symmetric-key encryption, which uses little energy; but solar-powered WSNs sometimes have sufficient energy to achieve a higher level of security through public-key encryption. However, if energy input and usage are not balanced, nodes may black out. By switching between symmetric-key and public-key encryption, based on an energy threshold, the level of security can be traded off against the urgency of energy-saving. This policy can also reduce the amount of energy used by some nodes in a WSN, since data encrypted using a public-key is simply relayed by intermediate nodes, whereas data encrypted using a symmetric-key must be decrypted and reencrypted in every node on its path. Through a simulation, we compared the use of either symmetric-key or public-key encryption alone with our scheme, which was shown to be more secure, to use energy more effectively, and to reduce the occurrence of node blackouts

    Global Routing Protocols for Wireless Body Area Networks

    Get PDF
    This work primarily consists of two parts. The first part deals with a wireless body area network with battery operated nodes. Global routing protocols are considered. The Dijkstra`s algorithm was modified using a novel link cost function in order to perform energy balancing across the network. The proposed protocol makes optimal use of the network energy and increases the network lifetime. Hardware experiments involving multiple nodes and an access point are performed to gather wireless channel information. Performance of two different types of network architectures is evaluated viz. on-body access point and off-body access point architectures. Results show up to 40% increase in average network lifetime with modest average increase of 0.4 dB in energy per bit. Proposed protocol lessens the need to recharge batteries frequently and as all the nodes deplete their energy source at the same time due to energy balancing, recharging can be done for all the batteries at the same time instead of recharging them one at a time. Network connectivity is evaluated using outage as a metric. Results show the cut-off effect which signifies the minimum amount of transmission power required to achieve reliable communication. The advantages of an off-body access point are demonstrated. The second part presents a global routing protocol based on Dijkstra`s algorithm for wireless body area networks with energy harvesting constraints. The protocol dynamically modifies routing trees based on available energy accumulated through energy harvesting. Various harvesting methods are considered. The results show that low data-rate applications are achievable using existing energy harvesting techniques while high data-rate applications call for advancements in these methods

    Low-Latency Geographic Routing for Asynchronous Energy-Harvesting WSNs

    No full text
    Abstract โ€” Research on data routing strategies for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) has largely focused on energy efficiency. However rapid advances in WSNs require routing protocols which can accommodate new types of energy source and data of requiring short end-to-end delay. In this paper, we describe a duty-cycle-based low-latency geographic routing for asynchronous energy-harvesting WSNs. It uses an algorithm (D-APOLLO) that periodically and locally determines the topological knowledge range and duty-cycle of each node, based on an estimated energy budget for each period which includes the currently available energy, the predicted energy consumption, and the energy expected from the harvesting device. This facilitates a lowlatency routing scheme which considers both geographic and duty-cycle information about the neighbors of a node, so that data can be routed efficiently and delivered to the sink as quickly as possible. Simulation results confirm that our routing scheme can deliver data to the sink with high reliability and low latency. Index Terms โ€” wireless sensor network, duty cycle, geographic, routing, low-latency, energy harvesting I

    DESIGN OF RELIABLE AND SUSTAINABLE WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS: CHALLENGES, PROTOCOLS AND CASE STUDIES

    Get PDF
    Integrated with the function of sensing, processing, and wireless communication, wireless sensors are attracting strong interest for a variety of monitoring and control applications. Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been deployed for industrial and remote monitoring purposes. As energy shortage is a worldwide problem, more attention has been placed on incorporating energy harvesting devices in WSNs. The main objective of this research is to systematically study the design principles and technical approaches to address three key challenges in designing reliable and sustainable WSNs; namely, communication reliability, operation with extremely low and dynamic power sources, and multi-tier network architecture. Mathematical throughput models, sustainable WSN communication strategies, and multi-tier network architecture are studied in this research to address these challenges, leading to protocols for reliable communication, energy-efficient operation, and network planning for specific application requirements. To account for realistic operating conditions, the study has implemented three distinct WSN testbeds: a WSN attached to the high-speed rotating spindle of a turning lathe, a WSN powered by a microbial fuel cell based energy harvesting system, and a WSN with a multi-tier network architecture. With each testbed, models and protocols are extracted, verified and analyzed. Extensive research has studied low power WSNs and energy harvesting capabilities. Despite these efforts, some important questions have not been well understood. This dissertation addresses the following three dimensions of the challenge. First, for reliable communication protocol design, mathematical throughput or energy efficiency estimation models are essential, yet have not been investigated accounting for specific application environment characteristics and requirements. Second, for WSNs with energy harvesting power sources, most current networking protocols do not work efficiently with the systems considered in this dissertation, such as those powered by extremely low and dynamic energy sources. Third, for multi-tier wireless network system design, routing protocols that are adaptive to real-world network conditions have not been studied. This dissertation focuses on these questions and explores experimentally derived mathematical models for designing protocols to meet specific application requirements. The main contributions of this research are 1) for industrial wireless sensor systems with fast-changing but repetitive mobile conditions, understand the performance and optimal choice of reliable wireless sensor data transmission methods, 2) for ultra-low energy harvesting wireless sensor devices, design an energy neutral communication protocol, and 3) for distributed rural wireless sensor systems, understand the efficiency of realistic routing in a multi-tier wireless network. Altogether, knowledge derived from study of the systems, models, and protocols in this work fuels the establishment of a useful framework for designing future WSNs
    corecore