A Note on Parameterised Knowledge Operations in Temporal Logic

We consider modeling the conception of knowledge in terms of temporal logic. The study of knowledge logical operations is originated around 1962 by representation of knowledge and belief using modalities. Nowadays, it is very good established area. However, we would like to look to it from a bit another point of view, our paper models knowledge in terms of linear temporal logic with {\em past}. We consider various versions of logical knowledge operations which may be defined in this framework. Technically, semantics, language and temporal knowledge logics based on our approach are constructed. Deciding algorithms are suggested, unification in terms of this approach is commented. This paper does not offer strong new technical outputs, instead we suggest new approach to conception of knowledge (in terms of time).Comment: 10 page

The complexity of admissible rules of {\L}ukasiewicz logic

We investigate the computational complexity of admissibility of inference rules in infinite-valued {\L}ukasiewicz propositional logic (\L). It was shown in [13] that admissibility in {\L} is checkable in PSPACE. We establish that this result is optimal, i.e., admissible rules of {\L} are PSPACE-complete. In contrast, derivable rules of {\L} are known to be coNP-complete.Comment: 14 pages, 2 figures; to appear in Journal of Logic and Computatio

Multi-agent non-linear temporal logic with embodied agent describing uncertainty

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 We study multi-agent non-linear temporal Logic TEm , Int Knwith embodied agent. Our approach models interaction of the agents and various aspects for computation of uncertainty in multi-agent environment. We construct algorithms for verification satisfiability and truth statements in the logic TEm , Int Kn. Found computational algorithms are based at refutability of rules in reduced form at special finite frames of effectively bounded size. We show that our chosen framework is rather flexible and it allows to express various approaches to uncertainty and formalizing meaning of the embodied agent

Intransitive temporal multi-agent’s logic, knowledge and uncertainty, plausibility

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. We study intransitive temporal logic implementing multiagent’s approach and formalizing knowledge and uncertainty. An innovative point here is usage of non-transitive linear time and multi-valued models - the ones using separate valuations Vj for agent’s knowledge of facts and summarized (agreed) valuation together with rules for computation truth values for compound formulas. The basic mathematical problems we study here are - decidability and decidability w.r.t. admissible rules. First, we study general case - the logic with non-uniform intransitivity and solve its decidability problem. Also we consider a modification of this logic - temporal logic with uniform non-transitivity and solve problem of recognizing admissibility in this logic

Non-transitive linear temporal logic and logical knowledge operations

© 2015 The Author, 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.We study a linear temporal logic LTLNT with non-transitive time (with NEXT and UNTIL) and possible interpretations for logical knowledge operations in this approach. We assume time to be non-transitive, linear and discrete, it is a major innovative part of our article. Motivation for our approach that time might be non-transitive and comments on possible interpretations of logical knowledge operations are given. The main result of Section 5 is a solution of the decidability problem for LTLNT, we find and describe in details the decision algorithm. In Section 6 we introduce non-transitive linear temporal logic LTLNT(m) with uniform bound (m) for non-transitivity. We compare it with standard linear temporal logic LTL and the logic LTLNT - where non-transitivity has no upper bound - and show that LTLNT may be approximated by logics LTLNT(m). Concluding part of the article contains a list of open interesting problems

Logical consecutions in discrete linear temporal logic

We investigate logical consequence in temporal logics in terms of logical consecutions. i.e., inference rules. First, we discuss the question: what does it mean for a logical consecution to be 'correct' in a propositional logic. We consider both valid and admissible consecutions in linear temporal logics and discuss the distinction between these two notions. The linear temporal logic LDTL, consisting of all formulas valid in the frame 〈L, ≤, ≥〉 of all integer numbers, is the prime object of our investigation. We describe consecutions admissible LDTL in a semantic way—via consecutions valid in special temporal Kripke/Hintikka models. Then we state that any temporal inference rule has a reduced normal form which is given in terms of uniform formulas of temporal degree 1. Using these facts and enhanced semantic techniques we construct an algorithm, which recognizes consecutions admissible in LDTL. Also, we note that using the same technique it follows that the linear temporal logic L (N) of all natural numbers is also decidable w.r.t. inference rules. So, we prove that both logics LDTL and L (N) are decidable w.r.t. admissible consecutions. In particular, as a consequence, they both are decidable (Known fact), and the given deciding algorithms are explicit