24,442 research outputs found
An Integrated Framework for Competitive Multi-channel Marketing of Multi-featured Products
For any company, multiple channels are available for reaching a population in
order to market its products. Some of the most well-known channels are (a) mass
media advertisement, (b) recommendations using social advertisement, and (c)
viral marketing using social networks. The company would want to maximize its
reach while also accounting for simultaneous marketing of competing products,
where the product marketings may not be independent. In this direction, we
propose and analyze a multi-featured generalization of the classical linear
threshold model. We hence develop a framework for integrating the considered
marketing channels into the social network, and an approach for allocating
budget among these channels
Optimal Multiphase Investment Strategies for Influencing Opinions in a Social Network
We study the problem of optimally investing in nodes of a social network in a
competitive setting, where two camps aim to maximize adoption of their opinions
by the population. In particular, we consider the possibility of campaigning in
multiple phases, where the final opinion of a node in a phase acts as its
initial biased opinion for the following phase. Using an extension of the
popular DeGroot-Friedkin model, we formulate the utility functions of the
camps, and show that they involve what can be interpreted as multiphase Katz
centrality. Focusing on two phases, we analytically derive Nash equilibrium
investment strategies, and the extent of loss that a camp would incur if it
acted myopically. Our simulation study affirms that nodes attributing higher
weightage to initial biases necessitate higher investment in the first phase,
so as to influence these biases for the terminal phase. We then study the
setting in which a camp's influence on a node depends on its initial bias. For
single camp, we present a polynomial time algorithm for determining an optimal
way to split the budget between the two phases. For competing camps, we show
the existence of Nash equilibria under reasonable assumptions, and that they
can be computed in polynomial time
A strategic and operational view of competitiveness and cohesion in the European context
The persistence of spatial developmental disparities suggests that the strategic directions of any initiative targeting regional competitiveness should follow the lines of (1) maximizing its competitive impact and (2) matching the territorial specificity. According to this perspective, the paper discusses an original theoretical construct and points to graphical representations of operational forms that may configure a policy of territorial development along four co-existent levels: (1) urban fields, (2) clusters, (3) development areas, and (4) disadvantaged areas. The main implication for public policy initiatives resides in facilitating the progress towards building up such a potential for growth.agglomeration, competitiveness, development, spatial network, territorial planning
Incentives for Transmission Investment in the PJM Electricity Market: FTRs or Regulation (or Both?)
This paper presents an application of a mechanism that provides incentives to promote transmission network expansion in the area of the US electric system known as PJM. The applied mechanism combines the merchant and regulatory approaches to attract investment into transmission grids. It is based on rebalancing a two-part tariff in the framework of a wholesale electricity market with locational pricing. The expansion of the network is carried out through the sale of financial transmission rights for the congested lines. The mechanism is tested for 14-node and 17-node geographical coverage areas of PJM. Under Laspeyres weights, it is shown that prices converge to the marginal cost of generation, the congestion rent decreases, and the total social welfare increases. The mechanism is shown to adjust prices effectively given either non-peak or peak demand.Electricity transmission expansion, incentive regulation, PJM
When-To-Post on Social Networks
For many users on social networks, one of the goals when broadcasting content
is to reach a large audience. The probability of receiving reactions to a
message differs for each user and depends on various factors, such as location,
daily and weekly behavior patterns and the visibility of the message. While
previous work has focused on overall network dynamics and message flow
cascades, the problem of recommending personalized posting times has remained
an underexplored topic of research. In this study, we formulate a when-to-post
problem, where the objective is to find the best times for a user to post on
social networks in order to maximize the probability of audience responses. To
understand the complexity of the problem, we examine user behavior in terms of
post-to-reaction times, and compare cross-network and cross-city weekly
reaction behavior for users in different cities, on both Twitter and Facebook.
We perform this analysis on over a billion posted messages and observed
reactions, and propose multiple approaches for generating personalized posting
schedules. We empirically assess these schedules on a sampled user set of 0.5
million active users and more than 25 million messages observed over a 56 day
period. We show that users see a reaction gain of up to 17% on Facebook and 4%
on Twitter when the recommended posting times are used. We open the dataset
used in this study, which includes timestamps for over 144 million posts and
over 1.1 billion reactions. The personalized schedules derived here are used in
a fully deployed production system to recommend posting times for millions of
users every day.Comment: 10 pages, to appear in KDD201
- …