76 research outputs found

    Local Antimagic Coloring of Some Graphs

    Full text link
    Given a graph G=(V,E)G =(V,E), a bijection f:Eβ†’{1,2,…,∣E∣}f: E \rightarrow \{1, 2, \dots,|E|\} is called a local antimagic labeling of GG if the vertex weight w(u)=βˆ‘uv∈Ef(uv)w(u) = \sum_{uv \in E} f(uv) is distinct for all adjacent vertices. The vertex weights under the local antimagic labeling of GG induce a proper vertex coloring of a graph GG. The \textit{local antimagic chromatic number} of GG denoted by Ο‡la(G)\chi_{la}(G) is the minimum number of weights taken over all such local antimagic labelings of GG. In this paper, we investigate the local antimagic chromatic numbers of the union of some families of graphs, corona product of graphs, and necklace graph and we construct infinitely many graphs satisfying Ο‡la(G)=Ο‡(G)\chi_{la}(G) = \chi(G)

    Lattice Grids and Prisms are Antimagic

    Get PDF
    An \emph{antimagic labeling} of a finite undirected simple graph with mm edges and nn vertices is a bijection from the set of edges to the integers 1,...,m1,...,m such that all nn vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with the same vertex. A graph is called \emph{antimagic} if it has an antimagic labeling. In 1990, Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every connected graph, but K2K_2, is antimagic. In 2004, N. Alon et al showed that this conjecture is true for nn-vertex graphs with minimum degree Ξ©(log⁑n)\Omega(\log n). They also proved that complete partite graphs (other than K2K_2) and nn-vertex graphs with maximum degree at least nβˆ’2n-2 are antimagic. Recently, Wang showed that the toroidal grids (the Cartesian products of two or more cycles) are antimagic. Two open problems left in Wang's paper are about the antimagicness of lattice grid graphs and prism graphs, which are the Cartesian products of two paths, and of a cycle and a path, respectively. In this article, we prove that these two classes of graphs are antimagic, by constructing such antimagic labelings.Comment: 10 pages, 6 figure

    Complete characterization of s-bridge graphs with local antimagic chromatic number 2

    Full text link
    An edge labeling of a connected graph G=(V,E)G = (V, E) is said to be local antimagic if it is a bijection f:Eβ†’{1,…,∣E∣}f:E \to\{1,\ldots ,|E|\} such that for any pair of adjacent vertices xx and yy, f+(x)=ΜΈf+(y)f^+(x)\not= f^+(y), where the induced vertex label f+(x)=βˆ‘f(e)f^+(x)= \sum f(e), with ee ranging over all the edges incident to xx. The local antimagic chromatic number of GG, denoted by Ο‡la(G)\chi_{la}(G), is the minimum number of distinct induced vertex labels over all local antimagic labelings of GG. In this paper, we characterize ss-bridge graphs with local antimagic chromatic number 2
    • …
    corecore