Analysis of some interior point continuous trajectories for convex programming

In this paper, we analyse three interior point continuous trajectories for convex programming with general linear constraints. The three continuous trajectories are derived from the primal–dual path-following method, the primal–dual affine scaling method and the central path, respectively. Theoretical properties of the three interior point continuous trajectories are fully studied. The optimality and convergence of all three interior point continuous trajectories are obtained for any interior feasible point under some mild conditions. In particular, with proper choice of some parameters, the convergence for all three interior point continuous trajectories does not require the strict complementarity or the analyticity of the objective function. These results are new in the literature

The Convergent Generalized Central Paths for Linearly Constrained Convex Programming

The convergence of central paths has been a focal point of research on interior point methods. Quite detailed analyses have been made for the linear case. However, when it comes to the convex case, even if the constraints remain linear, the problem is unsettled. In [Math. Program., 103 (2005), pp. 63–94], Gilbert, Gonzaga, and Karas presented some examples in convex optimization, where the central path fails to converge. In this paper, we aim at finding some continuous trajectories which can converge for all linearly constrained convex optimization problems under some mild assumptions. We design and analyze a class of continuous trajectories, which are the solutions of certain ordinary differential equation (ODE) systems for solving linearly constrained smooth convex programming. The solutions of these ODE systems are named generalized central paths. By only assuming the existence of a finite optimal solution, we are able to show that, starting from any interior feasible point, (i) all of the generalized central paths are convergent, and (ii) the limit point(s) are indeed the optimal solution(s) of the original optimization problem. Furthermore, we illustrate that for the key example of Gilbert, Gonzaga, and Karas, our generalized central paths converge to the optimal solutions