2,087 research outputs found
STUDY ON PROS AND CONS ARMY-POLICE ACTIVELY APPOINTED AS REGIONAL HEAD
This study will identify the pros and cons of active ARMY/POLICE being appointed as regional heads in 2022. In its journey, Indonesia has changed in organizing general elections; from the beginning, the public was allowed to vote for candidates from 2004 to the present. Ahead of the Simultaneous Regional Head Elections in 2024, several regions in the country will experience a leadership vacancy due to the expiration of the terms of office of governors, and regents/mayors starting in 2022. To fill the vacancy in leadership positions, the government can appoint an official until simultaneous regional elections are held in November 2024. This becomes a problem because the appointment of active TNI-Polri officers as acting (Pj) regional heads has caused a polemic. This study uses qualitative research using secondary data from news and journals related to the research. The results of the study indicate that some support this, it can be done with a note that the active TNI/Polri in office must still be supervised, and the positions occupied are equivalent to their duties. However, not a few refuse because this can reduce the value of democracy, and the TNI/Polri, which should focus on state security, will bring back the Dual function (dwifungsi) of the Armed Forces, which can disrupt the political system in Indonesia
Volume 28 - Issue 13 - Thursday, December 17, 1992
The Rose Thorn, Rose-Hulman\u27s independent student newspaper.https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/rosethorn/1573/thumbnail.jp
Information Outlook, August 2001
Volume 5, Issue 8https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_io_2001/1007/thumbnail.jp
Old North : Fall 2017
Bi-annual magazine published by the University of Central Oklahoma for its alumni and friends
Perils and Challenges of Social Media and Election Manipulation Analysis: The 2018 US Midterms
One of the hallmarks of a free and fair society is the ability to conduct a
peaceful and seamless transfer of power from one leader to another.
Democratically, this is measured in a citizen population's trust in the
electoral system of choosing a representative government. In view of the well
documented issues of the 2016 US Presidential election, we conducted an
in-depth analysis of the 2018 US Midterm elections looking specifically for
voter fraud or suppression. The Midterm election occurs in the middle of a 4
year presidential term. For the 2018 midterms, 35 senators and all the 435
seats in the House of Representatives were up for re-election, thus, every
congressional district and practically every state had a federal election. In
order to collect election related tweets, we analyzed Twitter during the month
prior to, and the two weeks following, the November 6, 2018 election day. In a
targeted analysis to detect statistical anomalies or election interference, we
identified several biases that can lead to wrong conclusions. Specifically, we
looked for divergence between actual voting outcomes and instances of the
#ivoted hashtag on the election day. This analysis highlighted three states of
concern: New York, California, and Texas. We repeated our analysis discarding
malicious accounts, such as social bots. Upon further inspection and against a
backdrop of collected general election-related tweets, we identified some
confounding factors, such as population bias, or bot and political ideology
inference, that can lead to false conclusions. We conclude by providing an
in-depth discussion of the perils and challenges of using social media data to
explore questions about election manipulation
Information Outlook, April 2008
Volume 12, Issue 4https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_io_2008/1003/thumbnail.jp
Spartan Daily, December 3, 2004
Volume 123, Issue 64https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/10068/thumbnail.jp
1975 Rose News Releases
https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/rose_news_releases/1002/thumbnail.jp
- …