4 research outputs found
Premise Selection for Mathematics by Corpus Analysis and Kernel Methods
Get PDFSmart premise selection is essential when using automated reasoning as a tool
for large-theory formal proof development. A good method for premise selection
in complex mathematical libraries is the application of machine learning to
large corpora of proofs. This work develops learning-based premise selection in
two ways. First, a newly available minimal dependency analysis of existing
high-level formal mathematical proofs is used to build a large knowledge base
of proof dependencies, providing precise data for ATP-based re-verification and
for training premise selection algorithms. Second, a new machine learning
algorithm for premise selection based on kernel methods is proposed and
implemented. To evaluate the impact of both techniques, a benchmark consisting
of 2078 large-theory mathematical problems is constructed,extending the older
MPTP Challenge benchmark. The combined effect of the techniques results in a
50% improvement on the benchmark over the Vampire/SInE state-of-the-art system
for automated reasoning in large theories.Comment: 26 page
MaLeS: A Framework for Automatic Tuning of Automated Theorem Provers
Full text linkMaLeS is an automatic tuning framework for automated theorem provers. It
provides solutions for both the strategy finding as well as the strategy
scheduling problem. This paper describes the tool and the methods used in it,
and evaluates its performance on three automated theorem provers: E, LEO-II and
Satallax. An evaluation on a subset of the TPTP library problems shows that on
average a MaLeS-tuned prover solves 8.67% more problems than the prover with
its default settings
