12,497 research outputs found
Disentangling causal webs in the brain using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A review of current approaches
In the past two decades, functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging has been used
to relate neuronal network activity to cognitive processing and behaviour.
Recently this approach has been augmented by algorithms that allow us to infer
causal links between component populations of neuronal networks. Multiple
inference procedures have been proposed to approach this research question but
so far, each method has limitations when it comes to establishing whole-brain
connectivity patterns. In this work, we discuss eight ways to infer causality
in fMRI research: Bayesian Nets, Dynamical Causal Modelling, Granger Causality,
Likelihood Ratios, LiNGAM, Patel's Tau, Structural Equation Modelling, and
Transfer Entropy. We finish with formulating some recommendations for the
future directions in this area
Estimating effective connectivity in linear brain network models
Contemporary neuroscience has embraced network science to study the complex
and self-organized structure of the human brain; one of the main outstanding
issues is that of inferring from measure data, chiefly functional Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (fMRI), the so-called effective connectivity in brain
networks, that is the existing interactions among neuronal populations. This
inverse problem is complicated by the fact that the BOLD (Blood Oxygenation
Level Dependent) signal measured by fMRI represent a dynamic and nonlinear
transformation (the hemodynamic response) of neuronal activity. In this paper,
we consider resting state (rs) fMRI data; building upon a linear population
model of the BOLD signal and a stochastic linear DCM model, the model
parameters are estimated through an EM-type iterative procedure, which
alternately estimates the neuronal activity by means of the Rauch-Tung-Striebel
(RTS) smoother, updates the connections among neuronal states and refines the
parameters of the hemodynamic model; sparsity in the interconnection structure
is favoured using an iteratively reweighting scheme. Experimental results using
rs-fMRI data are shown demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach and
comparison with state of the art routines (SPM12 toolbox) is provided
A nonstationary nonparametric Bayesian approach to dynamically modeling effective connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments
Effective connectivity analysis provides an understanding of the functional
organization of the brain by studying how activated regions influence one
other. We propose a nonparametric Bayesian approach to model effective
connectivity assuming a dynamic nonstationary neuronal system. Our approach
uses the Dirichlet process to specify an appropriate (most plausible according
to our prior beliefs) dynamic model as the "expectation" of a set of plausible
models upon which we assign a probability distribution. This addresses model
uncertainty associated with dynamic effective connectivity. We derive a Gibbs
sampling approach to sample from the joint (and marginal) posterior
distributions of the unknowns. Results on simulation experiments demonstrate
our model to be flexible and a better candidate in many situations. We also
used our approach to analyzing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
data on a Stroop task: our analysis provided new insight into the mechanism by
which an individual brain distinguishes and learns about shapes of objects.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/11-AOAS470 the Annals of
Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
Structure Learning in Coupled Dynamical Systems and Dynamic Causal Modelling
Identifying a coupled dynamical system out of many plausible candidates, each
of which could serve as the underlying generator of some observed measurements,
is a profoundly ill posed problem that commonly arises when modelling real
world phenomena. In this review, we detail a set of statistical procedures for
inferring the structure of nonlinear coupled dynamical systems (structure
learning), which has proved useful in neuroscience research. A key focus here
is the comparison of competing models of (ie, hypotheses about) network
architectures and implicit coupling functions in terms of their Bayesian model
evidence. These methods are collectively referred to as dynamical casual
modelling (DCM). We focus on a relatively new approach that is proving
remarkably useful; namely, Bayesian model reduction (BMR), which enables rapid
evaluation and comparison of models that differ in their network architecture.
We illustrate the usefulness of these techniques through modelling
neurovascular coupling (cellular pathways linking neuronal and vascular
systems), whose function is an active focus of research in neurobiology and the
imaging of coupled neuronal systems
Learning Discriminative Bayesian Networks from High-dimensional Continuous Neuroimaging Data
Due to its causal semantics, Bayesian networks (BN) have been widely employed
to discover the underlying data relationship in exploratory studies, such as
brain research. Despite its success in modeling the probability distribution of
variables, BN is naturally a generative model, which is not necessarily
discriminative. This may cause the ignorance of subtle but critical network
changes that are of investigation values across populations. In this paper, we
propose to improve the discriminative power of BN models for continuous
variables from two different perspectives. This brings two general
discriminative learning frameworks for Gaussian Bayesian networks (GBN). In the
first framework, we employ Fisher kernel to bridge the generative models of GBN
and the discriminative classifiers of SVMs, and convert the GBN parameter
learning to Fisher kernel learning via minimizing a generalization error bound
of SVMs. In the second framework, we employ the max-margin criterion and build
it directly upon GBN models to explicitly optimize the classification
performance of the GBNs. The advantages and disadvantages of the two frameworks
are discussed and experimentally compared. Both of them demonstrate strong
power in learning discriminative parameters of GBNs for neuroimaging based
brain network analysis, as well as maintaining reasonable representation
capacity. The contributions of this paper also include a new Directed Acyclic
Graph (DAG) constraint with theoretical guarantee to ensure the graph validity
of GBN.Comment: 16 pages and 5 figures for the article (excluding appendix
Towards a Multi-Subject Analysis of Neural Connectivity
Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and associated probability models are widely
used to model neural connectivity and communication channels. In many
experiments, data are collected from multiple subjects whose connectivities may
differ but are likely to share many features. In such circumstances it is
natural to leverage similarity between subjects to improve statistical
efficiency. The first exact algorithm for estimation of multiple related DAGs
was recently proposed by Oates et al. 2014; in this letter we present examples
and discuss implications of the methodology as applied to the analysis of fMRI
data from a multi-subject experiment. Elicitation of tuning parameters requires
care and we illustrate how this may proceed retrospectively based on technical
replicate data. In addition to joint learning of subject-specific connectivity,
we allow for heterogeneous collections of subjects and simultaneously estimate
relationships between the subjects themselves. This letter aims to highlight
the potential for exact estimation in the multi-subject setting.Comment: to appear in Neural Computation 27:1-2
- …