The Self-Organisation of Innovation Networks

This paper explores the self-organising principles of horizontally-integrated innovation networks. It isshown that such networks can self-organising in environments where the co-ordination and production ofnew knowledge is itself a complex, dynamic and highly non-linear processes. The paper argues thedevelopment of a self-organisation perspective of innovation networks has two advantages. First, itprovides a general framework of dynamic systems in which different strands of a highly fragmentedliterature can be drawn together. Second, formal self-organisation modelling techniques can provideinteresting new insights into the micro-macro processes driving dynamic innovation systems.Section 1 of the paper identifies the four key principles of self-organisation: local interaction, non-linearity,thermodynamic openness and emergence. Section 2 discusses important complementarities between self-organisationtheory and the ‘new’ theory of innovation, with the latter’s emphasis of the systemic nature ofknowledge production within innovation networks containing multiple private and public institutions thatare connected in highly complicated and non-linear ways. This paves the way for a formal model of self-organisinginnovation networks presented in section 3. Section 4 discusses the main properties of theoutputs generated by the model and its novel insights, section 5 summarising and considering the potentialadvantages for current and future research offered by the self-organisation approach.research and development ;

From Simple to Complex and Ultra-complex Systems:\ud A Paradigm Shift Towards Non-Abelian Systems Dynamics

Atoms, molecules, organisms distinguish layers of reality because of the causal links that govern their behavior, both horizontally (atom-atom, molecule-molecule, organism-organism) and vertically (atom-molecule-organism). This is the first intuition of the theory of levels. Even if the further development of the theory will require imposing a number of qualifications to this initial intuition, the idea of a series of entities organized on different levels of complexity will prove correct. Living systems as well as social systems and the human mind present features remarkably different from those characterizing non-living, simple physical and chemical systems. We propose that super-complexity requires at least four different categorical frameworks, provided by the theories of levels of reality, chronotopoids, (generalized) interactions, and anticipation

Controllability of structural brain networks.

Cognitive function is driven by dynamic interactions between large-scale neural circuits or networks, enabling behaviour. However, fundamental principles constraining these dynamic network processes have remained elusive. Here we use tools from control and network theories to offer a mechanistic explanation for how the brain moves between cognitive states drawn from the network organization of white matter microstructure. Our results suggest that densely connected areas, particularly in the default mode system, facilitate the movement of the brain to many easily reachable states. Weakly connected areas, particularly in cognitive control systems, facilitate the movement of the brain to difficult-to-reach states. Areas located on the boundary between network communities, particularly in attentional control systems, facilitate the integration or segregation of diverse cognitive systems. Our results suggest that structural network differences between cognitive circuits dictate their distinct roles in controlling trajectories of brain network function

From Simple to Complex and Ultra-complex Systems:\ud A Paradigm Shift Towards Non-Abelian Systems Dynamics

Atoms, molecules, organisms distinguish layers of reality because of the causal links that govern their behavior, both horizontally (atom-atom, molecule-molecule, organism-organism) and vertically (atom-molecule-organism). This is the first intuition of the theory of levels. Even if the further development of the theory will require imposing a number of qualifications to this initial intuition, the idea of a series of entities organized on different levels of complexity will prove correct. Living systems as well as social systems and the human mind present features remarkably different from those characterizing non-living, simple physical and chemical systems. We propose that super-complexity requires at least four different categorical frameworks, provided by the theories of levels of reality, chronotopoids, (generalized) interactions, and anticipation

Preliminary specification and design documentation for software components to achieve catallaxy in computational systems

This Report is about the preliminary specifications and design documentation for software components to achieve Catallaxy in computational systems. -- Die Arbeit beschreibt die Spezifikation und das Design von Softwarekomponenten, um das Konzept der Katallaxie in Grid Systemen umzusetzen. Eine Einführung ordnet das Konzept der Katallaxie in bestehende Grid Taxonomien ein und stellt grundlegende Komponenten vor. Anschließend werden diese Komponenten auf ihre Anwendbarkeit in bestehenden Application Layer Netzwerken untersucht.Grid Computing

Echo state model of non-Markovian reinforcement learning, An

Department Head: Dale H. Grit.2008 Spring.Includes bibliographical references (pages 137-142).There exists a growing need for intelligent, autonomous control strategies that operate in real-world domains. Theoretically the state-action space must exhibit the Markov property in order for reinforcement learning to be applicable. Empirical evidence, however, suggests that reinforcement learning also applies to domains where the state-action space is approximately Markovian, a requirement for the overwhelming majority of real-world domains. These domains, termed non-Markovian reinforcement learning domains, raise a unique set of practical challenges. The reconstruction dimension required to approximate a Markovian state-space is unknown a priori and can potentially be large. Further, spatial complexity of local function approximation of the reinforcement learning domain grows exponentially with the reconstruction dimension. Parameterized dynamic systems alleviate both embedding length and state-space dimensionality concerns by reconstructing an approximate Markovian state-space via a compact, recurrent representation. Yet this representation extracts a cost; modeling reinforcement learning domains via adaptive, parameterized dynamic systems is characterized by instability, slow-convergence, and high computational or spatial training complexity. The objectives of this research are to demonstrate a stable, convergent, accurate, and scalable model of non-Markovian reinforcement learning domains. These objectives are fulfilled via fixed point analysis of the dynamics underlying the reinforcement learning domain and the Echo State Network, a class of parameterized dynamic system. Understanding models of non-Markovian reinforcement learning domains requires understanding the interactions between learning domains and their models. Fixed point analysis of the Mountain Car Problem reinforcement learning domain, for both local and nonlocal function approximations, suggests a close relationship between the locality of the approximation and the number and severity of bifurcations of the fixed point structure. This research suggests the likely cause of this relationship: reinforcement learning domains exist within a dynamic feature space in which trajectories are analogous to states. The fixed point structure maps dynamic space onto state-space. This explanation suggests two testable hypotheses. Reinforcement learning is sensitive to state-space locality because states cluster as trajectories in time rather than space. Second, models using trajectory-based features should exhibit good modeling performance and few changes in fixed point structure. Analysis of performance of lookup table, feedforward neural network, and Echo State Network (ESN) on the Mountain Car Problem reinforcement learning domain confirm these hypotheses. The ESN is a large, sparse, randomly-generated, unadapted recurrent neural network, which adapts a linear projection of the target domain onto the hidden layer. ESN modeling results on reinforcement learning domains show it achieves performance comparable to lookup table and neural network architectures on the Mountain Car Problem with minimal changes to fixed point structure. Also, the ESN achieves lookup table caliber performance when modeling Acrobot, a four-dimensional control problem, but is less successful modeling the lower dimensional Modified Mountain Car Problem. These performance discrepancies are attributed to the ESN’s excellent ability to represent complex short term dynamics, and its inability to consolidate long temporal dependencies into a static memory. Without memory consolidation, reinforcement learning domains exhibiting attractors with multiple dynamic scales are unlikely to be well-modeled via ESN. To mediate this problem, a simple ESN memory consolidation method is presented and tested for stationary dynamic systems. These results indicate the potential to improve modeling performance in reinforcement learning domains via memory consolidation

Can biological quantum networks solve NP-hard problems?

There is a widespread view that the human brain is so complex that it cannot be efficiently simulated by universal Turing machines. During the last decades the question has therefore been raised whether we need to consider quantum effects to explain the imagined cognitive power of a conscious mind. This paper presents a personal view of several fields of philosophy and computational neurobiology in an attempt to suggest a realistic picture of how the brain might work as a basis for perception, consciousness and cognition. The purpose is to be able to identify and evaluate instances where quantum effects might play a significant role in cognitive processes. Not surprisingly, the conclusion is that quantum-enhanced cognition and intelligence are very unlikely to be found in biological brains. Quantum effects may certainly influence the functionality of various components and signalling pathways at the molecular level in the brain network, like ion ports, synapses, sensors, and enzymes. This might evidently influence the functionality of some nodes and perhaps even the overall intelligence of the brain network, but hardly give it any dramatically enhanced functionality. So, the conclusion is that biological quantum networks can only approximately solve small instances of NP-hard problems. On the other hand, artificial intelligence and machine learning implemented in complex dynamical systems based on genuine quantum networks can certainly be expected to show enhanced performance and quantum advantage compared with classical networks. Nevertheless, even quantum networks can only be expected to efficiently solve NP-hard problems approximately. In the end it is a question of precision - Nature is approximate.Comment: 38 page