3 research outputs found
Learning Probabilistic Logic Programs in Continuous Domains
The field of statistical relational learning aims at unifying logic and
probability to reason and learn from data. Perhaps the most successful paradigm
in the field is probabilistic logic programming: the enabling of stochastic
primitives in logic programming, which is now increasingly seen to provide a
declarative background to complex machine learning applications. While many
systems offer inference capabilities, the more significant challenge is that of
learning meaningful and interpretable symbolic representations from data. In
that regard, inductive logic programming and related techniques have paved much
of the way for the last few decades.
Unfortunately, a major limitation of this exciting landscape is that much of
the work is limited to finite-domain discrete probability distributions.
Recently, a handful of systems have been extended to represent and perform
inference with continuous distributions. The problem, of course, is that
classical solutions for inference are either restricted to well-known
parametric families (e.g., Gaussians) or resort to sampling strategies that
provide correct answers only in the limit. When it comes to learning, moreover,
inducing representations remains entirely open, other than "data-fitting"
solutions that force-fit points to aforementioned parametric families.
In this paper, we take the first steps towards inducing probabilistic logic
programs for continuous and mixed discrete-continuous data, without being
pigeon-holed to a fixed set of distribution families. Our key insight is to
leverage techniques from piecewise polynomial function approximation theory,
yielding a principled way to learn and compositionally construct density
functions. We test the framework and discuss the learned representations.Comment: Accepted at the 2018 KR Workshop on Hybrid Reasoning and Learnin
Symbolic Logic meets Machine Learning: A Brief Survey in Infinite Domains
The tension between deduction and induction is perhaps the most fundamental
issue in areas such as philosophy, cognition and artificial intelligence (AI).
The deduction camp concerns itself with questions about the expressiveness of
formal languages for capturing knowledge about the world, together with proof
systems for reasoning from such knowledge bases. The learning camp attempts to
generalize from examples about partial descriptions about the world. In AI,
historically, these camps have loosely divided the development of the field,
but advances in cross-over areas such as statistical relational learning,
neuro-symbolic systems, and high-level control have illustrated that the
dichotomy is not very constructive, and perhaps even ill-formed. In this
article, we survey work that provides further evidence for the connections
between logic and learning. Our narrative is structured in terms of three
strands: logic versus learning, machine learning for logic, and logic for
machine learning, but naturally, there is considerable overlap. We place an
emphasis on the following "sore" point: there is a common misconception that
logic is for discrete properties, whereas probability theory and machine
learning, more generally, is for continuous properties. We report on results
that challenge this view on the limitations of logic, and expose the role that
logic can play for learning in infinite domains