22,740 research outputs found
Ensuring Readability and Data-fidelity using Head-modifier Templates in Deep Type Description Generation
A type description is a succinct noun compound which helps human and machines
to quickly grasp the informative and distinctive information of an entity.
Entities in most knowledge graphs (KGs) still lack such descriptions, thus
calling for automatic methods to supplement such information. However, existing
generative methods either overlook the grammatical structure or make factual
mistakes in generated texts. To solve these problems, we propose a
head-modifier template-based method to ensure the readability and data fidelity
of generated type descriptions. We also propose a new dataset and two automatic
metrics for this task. Experiments show that our method improves substantially
compared with baselines and achieves state-of-the-art performance on both
datasets.Comment: ACL 201
Syn-QG: Syntactic and Shallow Semantic Rules for Question Generation
Question Generation (QG) is fundamentally a simple syntactic transformation;
however, many aspects of semantics influence what questions are good to form.
We implement this observation by developing Syn-QG, a set of transparent
syntactic rules leveraging universal dependencies, shallow semantic parsing,
lexical resources, and custom rules which transform declarative sentences into
question-answer pairs. We utilize PropBank argument descriptions and VerbNet
state predicates to incorporate shallow semantic content, which helps generate
questions of a descriptive nature and produce inferential and semantically
richer questions than existing systems. In order to improve syntactic fluency
and eliminate grammatically incorrect questions, we employ back-translation
over the output of these syntactic rules. A set of crowd-sourced evaluations
shows that our system can generate a larger number of highly grammatical and
relevant questions than previous QG systems and that back-translation
drastically improves grammaticality at a slight cost of generating irrelevant
questions.Comment: Some of the results in the paper were incorrec
- …