66,613 research outputs found
Graphene: Semantically-Linked Propositions in Open Information Extraction
We present an Open Information Extraction (IE) approach that uses a
two-layered transformation stage consisting of a clausal disembedding layer and
a phrasal disembedding layer, together with rhetorical relation identification.
In that way, we convert sentences that present a complex linguistic structure
into simplified, syntactically sound sentences, from which we can extract
propositions that are represented in a two-layered hierarchy in the form of
core relational tuples and accompanying contextual information which are
semantically linked via rhetorical relations. In a comparative evaluation, we
demonstrate that our reference implementation Graphene outperforms
state-of-the-art Open IE systems in the construction of correct n-ary
predicate-argument structures. Moreover, we show that existing Open IE
approaches can benefit from the transformation process of our framework.Comment: 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING
2018
Graphene: A Context-Preserving Open Information Extraction System
We introduce Graphene, an Open IE system whose goal is to generate accurate,
meaningful and complete propositions that may facilitate a variety of
downstream semantic applications. For this purpose, we transform syntactically
complex input sentences into clean, compact structures in the form of core
facts and accompanying contexts, while identifying the rhetorical relations
that hold between them in order to maintain their semantic relationship. In
that way, we preserve the context of the relational tuples extracted from a
source sentence, generating a novel lightweight semantic representation for
Open IE that enhances the expressiveness of the extracted propositions.Comment: 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING
2018
Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essays
In this article, we present a novel approach for parsing argumentation
structures. We identify argument components using sequence labeling at the
token level and apply a new joint model for detecting argumentation structures.
The proposed model globally optimizes argument component types and
argumentative relations using integer linear programming. We show that our
model considerably improves the performance of base classifiers and
significantly outperforms challenging heuristic baselines. Moreover, we
introduce a novel corpus of persuasive essays annotated with argumentation
structures. We show that our annotation scheme and annotation guidelines
successfully guide human annotators to substantial agreement. This corpus and
the annotation guidelines are freely available for ensuring reproducibility and
to encourage future research in computational argumentation.Comment: Under review in Computational Linguistics. First submission: 26
October 2015. Revised submission: 15 July 201
Neural End-to-End Learning for Computational Argumentation Mining
We investigate neural techniques for end-to-end computational argumentation
mining (AM). We frame AM both as a token-based dependency parsing and as a
token-based sequence tagging problem, including a multi-task learning setup.
Contrary to models that operate on the argument component level, we find that
framing AM as dependency parsing leads to subpar performance results. In
contrast, less complex (local) tagging models based on BiLSTMs perform robustly
across classification scenarios, being able to catch long-range dependencies
inherent to the AM problem. Moreover, we find that jointly learning 'natural'
subtasks, in a multi-task learning setup, improves performance.Comment: To be published at ACL 201
- …