228 research outputs found
On unification and admissible rules in Gabbay-de Jongh logics
In this paper we study the admissible rules of intermediate logics with the disjunction property. We establish some general results on extension of models and sets of formulas, and eventually specialize to provide a a basis for the admissible rules of the Gabbay-de Jongh logics and to show that that logic has finitary unification type
De Jongh's Theorem for Intuitionistic Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory
We prove that the propositional logic of intuitionistic set theory IZF is
intuitionistic propositional logic IPC. More generally, we show that IZF has
the de Jongh property with respect to every intermediate logic that is complete
with respect to a class of finite trees. The same results follow for CZF.Comment: 12 page
On the proof complexity of logics of bounded branching
We investigate the proof complexity of extended Frege (EF) systems for basic
transitive modal logics (K4, S4, GL, ...) augmented with the bounded branching
axioms . First, we study feasibility of the disjunction property
and more general extension rules in EF systems for these logics: we show that
the corresponding decision problems reduce to total coNP search problems (or
equivalently, disjoint NP pairs, in the binary case); more precisely, the
decision problem for extension rules is equivalent to a certain special case of
interpolation for the classical EF system. Next, we use this characterization
to prove superpolynomial (or even exponential, with stronger hypotheses)
separations between EF and substitution Frege (SF) systems for all transitive
logics contained in or under some
assumptions weaker than . We also prove analogous
results for superintuitionistic logics: we characterize the decision complexity
of multi-conclusion Visser's rules in EF systems for Gabbay--de Jongh logics
, and we show conditional separations between EF and SF for all
intermediate logics contained in .Comment: 58 page
Characteristic formulas over intermediate logics
We expand the notion of characteristic formula to infinite finitely
presentable subdirectly irreducible algebras. We prove that there is a
continuum of varieties of Heyting algebras containing infinite finitely
presentable subdirectly irreducible algebras. Moreover, we prove that there is
a continuum of intermediate logics that can be axiomatized by characteristic
formulas of infinite algebras while they are not axiomatizable by standard
Jankov formulas. We give the examples of intermediate logics that are not
axiomatizable by characteristic formulas of infinite algebras. Also, using the
Goedel-McKinsey-Tarski translation we extend these results to the varieties of
interior algebras and normal extensions of S
Lewis meets Brouwer: constructive strict implication
C. I. Lewis invented modern modal logic as a theory of "strict implication".
Over the classical propositional calculus one can as well work with the unary
box connective. Intuitionistically, however, the strict implication has greater
expressive power than the box and allows to make distinctions invisible in the
ordinary syntax. In particular, the logic determined by the most popular
semantics of intuitionistic K becomes a proper extension of the minimal normal
logic of the binary connective. Even an extension of this minimal logic with
the "strength" axiom, classically near-trivial, preserves the distinction
between the binary and the unary setting. In fact, this distinction and the
strong constructive strict implication itself has been also discovered by the
functional programming community in their study of "arrows" as contrasted with
"idioms". Our particular focus is on arithmetical interpretations of the
intuitionistic strict implication in terms of preservativity in extensions of
Heyting's Arithmetic.Comment: Our invited contribution to the collection "L.E.J. Brouwer, 50 years
later
Multiple Conclusion Rules in Logics with the Disjunction Property
We prove that for the intermediate logics with the disjunction property any
basis of admissible rules can be reduced to a basis of admissible m-rules
(multiple-conclusion rules), and every basis of admissible m-rules can be
reduced to a basis of admissible rules. These results can be generalized to a
broad class of logics including positive logic and its extensions, Johansson
logic, normal extensions of S4, n-transitive logics and intuitionistic modal
logics
- …