117 research outputs found
Interactive proofs for BQP via self-tested graph states
Using the measurement-based quantum computation model, we construct
interactive proofs with non-communicating quantum provers and a classical
verifier. Our construction gives interactive proofs for all languages in BQP
with a polynomial number of quantum provers, each of which, in the honest case,
performs only a single measurement.
Our techniques use self-tested graph states. In this regard we introduce two
important improvements over previous work. Specifically, we derive new error
bounds which scale polynomially with the size of the graph compared with
exponential dependence on the size of the graph in previous work. We also
extend the self-testing error bounds on measurements to a very general set
which includes the adaptive measurements used for measurement-based quantum
computation as a special case.Comment: 53 page
Merlin-Arthur with efficient quantum Merlin and quantum supremacy for the second level of the Fourier hierarchy
We introduce a simple sub-universal quantum computing model, which we call
the Hadamard-classical circuit with one-qubit (HC1Q) model. It consists of a
classical reversible circuit sandwiched by two layers of Hadamard gates, and
therefore it is in the second level of the Fourier hierarchy. We show that
output probability distributions of the HC1Q model cannot be classically
efficiently sampled within a multiplicative error unless the polynomial-time
hierarchy collapses to the second level. The proof technique is different from
those used for previous sub-universal models, such as IQP, Boson Sampling, and
DQC1, and therefore the technique itself might be useful for finding other
sub-universal models that are hard to classically simulate. We also study the
classical verification of quantum computing in the second level of the Fourier
hierarchy. To this end, we define a promise problem, which we call the
probability distribution distinguishability with maximum norm (PDD-Max). It is
a promise problem to decide whether output probability distributions of two
quantum circuits are far apart or close. We show that PDD-Max is BQP-complete,
but if the two circuits are restricted to some types in the second level of the
Fourier hierarchy, such as the HC1Q model or the IQP model, PDD-Max has a
Merlin-Arthur system with quantum polynomial-time Merlin and classical
probabilistic polynomial-time Arthur.Comment: 30 pages, 4 figure
NP-complete Problems and Physical Reality
Can NP-complete problems be solved efficiently in the physical universe? I
survey proposals including soap bubbles, protein folding, quantum computing,
quantum advice, quantum adiabatic algorithms, quantum-mechanical
nonlinearities, hidden variables, relativistic time dilation, analog computing,
Malament-Hogarth spacetimes, quantum gravity, closed timelike curves, and
"anthropic computing." The section on soap bubbles even includes some
"experimental" results. While I do not believe that any of the proposals will
let us solve NP-complete problems efficiently, I argue that by studying them,
we can learn something not only about computation but also about physics.Comment: 23 pages, minor correction
Quantum Proofs
Quantum information and computation provide a fascinating twist on the notion
of proofs in computational complexity theory. For instance, one may consider a
quantum computational analogue of the complexity class \class{NP}, known as
QMA, in which a quantum state plays the role of a proof (also called a
certificate or witness), and is checked by a polynomial-time quantum
computation. For some problems, the fact that a quantum proof state could be a
superposition over exponentially many classical states appears to offer
computational advantages over classical proof strings. In the interactive proof
system setting, one may consider a verifier and one or more provers that
exchange and process quantum information rather than classical information
during an interaction for a given input string, giving rise to quantum
complexity classes such as QIP, QSZK, and QMIP* that represent natural quantum
analogues of IP, SZK, and MIP. While quantum interactive proof systems inherit
some properties from their classical counterparts, they also possess distinct
and uniquely quantum features that lead to an interesting landscape of
complexity classes based on variants of this model.
In this survey we provide an overview of many of the known results concerning
quantum proofs, computational models based on this concept, and properties of
the complexity classes they define. In particular, we discuss non-interactive
proofs and the complexity class QMA, single-prover quantum interactive proof
systems and the complexity class QIP, statistical zero-knowledge quantum
interactive proof systems and the complexity class \class{QSZK}, and
multiprover interactive proof systems and the complexity classes QMIP, QMIP*,
and MIP*.Comment: Survey published by NOW publisher
- …