8,335 research outputs found
09411 Abstracts Collection -- Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction
From 04.10. to 09.10.2009, the Dagstuhl Seminar 09411
``Interaction versus Automation: The two Faces of Deduction\u27\u27 was held
in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics.
During the seminar, several participants presented their current
research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of
the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of
seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section
describes the seminar topics and goals in general.
Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available
Proving termination through conditional termination
We present a constraint-based method for proving conditional termination of integer programs. Building on this, we construct a framework to prove (unconditional) program termination using a powerful mechanism to combine conditional termination proofs. Our key insight is that a conditional termination proof shows termination for a subset of program execution states which do not need to be considered in the remaining analysis. This facilitates more effective termination as well as non-termination analyses, and allows handling loops with different execution phases naturally. Moreover, our method can deal with sequences of loops compositionally. In an empirical evaluation, we show that our implementation VeryMax outperforms state-of-the-art tools on a range of standard benchmarks.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
Forward Invariant Cuts to Simplify Proofs of Safety
The use of deductive techniques, such as theorem provers, has several
advantages in safety verification of hybrid sys- tems; however,
state-of-the-art theorem provers require ex- tensive manual intervention.
Furthermore, there is often a gap between the type of assistance that a theorem
prover requires to make progress on a proof task and the assis- tance that a
system designer is able to provide. This paper presents an extension to
KeYmaera, a deductive verification tool for differential dynamic logic; the new
technique allows local reasoning using system designer intuition about per-
formance within particular modes as part of a proof task. Our approach allows
the theorem prover to leverage for- ward invariants, discovered using numerical
techniques, as part of a proof of safety. We introduce a new inference rule
into the proof calculus of KeYmaera, the forward invariant cut rule, and we
present a methodology to discover useful forward invariants, which are then
used with the new cut rule to complete verification tasks. We demonstrate how
our new approach can be used to complete verification tasks that lie out of the
reach of existing deductive approaches us- ing several examples, including one
involving an automotive powertrain control system.Comment: Extended version of EMSOFT pape
- …