4 research outputs found

    Weak heaps and friends:recent developments

    Get PDF

    Strengthened Lazy Heaps: Surpassing the Lower Bounds for Binary Heaps

    Full text link
    Let nn denote the number of elements currently in a data structure. An in-place heap is stored in the first nn locations of an array, uses O(1)O(1) extra space, and supports the operations: minimum, insert, and extract-min. We introduce an in-place heap, for which minimum and insert take O(1)O(1) worst-case time, and extract-min takes O(lgn)O(\lg{} n) worst-case time and involves at most lgn+O(1)\lg{} n + O(1) element comparisons. The achieved bounds are optimal to within additive constant terms for the number of element comparisons. In particular, these bounds for both insert and extract-min -and the time bound for insert- surpass the corresponding lower bounds known for binary heaps, though our data structure is similar. In a binary heap, when viewed as a nearly complete binary tree, every node other than the root obeys the heap property, i.e. the element at a node is not smaller than that at its parent. To surpass the lower bound for extract-min, we reinforce a stronger property at the bottom levels of the heap that the element at any right child is not smaller than that at its left sibling. To surpass the lower bound for insert, we buffer insertions and allow O(lg2n)O(\lg^2{} n) nodes to violate heap order in relation to their parents

    QuickHeapsort: Modifications and improved analysis

    Full text link
    We present a new analysis for QuickHeapsort splitting it into the analysis of the partition-phases and the analysis of the heap-phases. This enables us to consider samples of non-constant size for the pivot selection and leads to better theoretical bounds for the algorithm. Furthermore we introduce some modifications of QuickHeapsort, both in-place and using n extra bits. We show that on every input the expected number of comparisons is n lg n - 0.03n + o(n) (in-place) respectively n lg n -0.997 n+ o (n). Both estimates improve the previously known best results. (It is conjectured in Wegener93 that the in-place algorithm Bottom-Up-Heapsort uses at most n lg n + 0.4 n on average and for Weak-Heapsort which uses n extra-bits the average number of comparisons is at most n lg n -0.42n in EdelkampS02.) Moreover, our non-in-place variant can even compete with index based Heapsort variants (e.g. Rank-Heapsort in WangW07) and Relaxed-Weak-Heapsort (n lg n -0.9 n+ o (n) comparisons in the worst case) for which no O(n)-bound on the number of extra bits is known
    corecore