An ~O(n) Queries Adaptive Tester for Unateness

We present an adaptive tester for the unateness property of Boolean functions. Given a function f:{0,1}^n -> {0,1} the tester makes O(n log(n)/epsilon) adaptive queries to the function. The tester always accepts a unate function, and rejects with probability at least 0.9 if a function is epsilon-far from being unate

Adaptive Boolean Monotonicity Testing in Total Influence Time

Testing monotonicity of a Boolean function f:{0,1}^n -> {0,1} is an important problem in the field of property testing. It has led to connections with many interesting combinatorial questions on the directed hypercube: routing, random walks, and new isoperimetric theorems. Denoting the proximity parameter by epsilon, the best tester is the non-adaptive O~(epsilon^{-2}sqrt{n}) tester of Khot-Minzer-Safra (FOCS 2015). A series of recent results by Belovs-Blais (STOC 2016) and Chen-Waingarten-Xie (STOC 2017) have led to Omega~(n^{1/3}) lower bounds for adaptive testers. Reducing this gap is a significant question, that touches on the role of adaptivity in monotonicity testing of Boolean functions. We approach this question from the perspective of parametrized property testing, a concept recently introduced by Pallavoor-Raskhodnikova-Varma (ACM TOCT 2017), where one seeks to understand performance of testers with respect to parameters other than just the size. Our result is an adaptive monotonicity tester with one-sided error whose query complexity is O(epsilon^{-2}I(f)log^5 n), where I(f) is the total influence of the function. Therefore, adaptivity provably helps monotonicity testing for low influence functions

Testing Hereditary Properties of Sequences

A hereditary property of a sequence is one that is preserved when restricting to subsequences. We show that there exist hereditary properties of sequences that cannot be tested with sublinear queries, resolving an open question posed by Newman et al. This proof relies crucially on an infinite alphabet, however; for finite alphabets, we observe that any hereditary property can be tested with a constant number of queries

Adaptive Lower Bound for Testing Monotonicity on the Line

In the property testing model, the task is to distinguish objects possessing some property from the objects that are far from it. One of such properties is monotonicity, when the objects are functions from one poset to another. This is an active area of research. In this paper we study query complexity of epsilon-testing monotonicity of a function f : [n]->[r]. All our lower bounds are for adaptive two-sided testers. - We prove a nearly tight lower bound for this problem in terms of r. The bound is Omega((log r)/(log log r)) when epsilon = 1/2. No previous satisfactory lower bound in terms of r was known. - We completely characterise query complexity of this problem in terms of n for smaller values of epsilon. The complexity is Theta(epsilon^{-1} log (epsilon n)). Apart from giving the lower bound, this improves on the best known upper bound. Finally, we give an alternative proof of the Omega(epsilon^{-1}d log n - epsilon^{-1}log epsilon^{-1}) lower bound for testing monotonicity on the hypergrid [n]^d due to Chakrabarty and Seshadhri (RANDOM\u2713)

The Power and Limitations of Uniform Samples in Testing Properties of Figures

We investigate testing of properties of 2-dimensional figures that consist of a black object on a white background. Given a parameter epsilon in (0,1/2), a tester for a specified property has to accept with probability at least 2/3 if the input figure satisfies the property and reject with probability at least 2/3 if it does not. In general, property testers can query the color of any point in the input figure. We study the power of testers that get access only to uniform samples from the input figure. We show that for the property of being a half-plane, the uniform testers are as powerful as general testers: they require only O(1/epsilon) samples. In contrast, we prove that convexity can be tested with O(1/epsilon) queries by testers that can make queries of their choice while uniform testers for this property require Omega(1/epsilon^{5/4}) samples. Previously, the fastest known tester for convexity needed Theta(1/epsilon^{4/3}) queries