639 research outputs found
Improved NP-Inapproximability for 2-Variable Linear Equations
An instance of the 2-Lin(2) problem is a system of equations of the form "x_i + x_j = b (mod 2)". Given such a system in which it\u27s possible to satisfy all but an epsilon fraction of the equations, we show it is NP-hard to satisfy all but a C*epsilon fraction of the equations, for any C < 11/8 = 1.375 (and any 0 < epsilon <= 1/8). The previous best result, standing for over 15 years, had 5/4 in place of 11/8. Our result provides the best known NP-hardness even for the Unique Games problem, and it also holds for the special case of Max-Cut. The precise factor 11/8 is unlikely to be best possible; we also give a conjecture concerning analysis of Boolean functions which, if true, would yield a larger hardness factor of 3/2.
Our proof is by a modified gadget reduction from a pairwise-independent predicate. We also show an inherent limitation to this type of gadget reduction. In particular, any such reduction can never establish a hardness factor C greater than 2.54. Previously, no such limitation on gadget reductions was known
Inapproximability of Combinatorial Optimization Problems
We survey results on the hardness of approximating combinatorial optimization
problems
Approximation Hardness of Graphic TSP on Cubic Graphs
We prove explicit approximation hardness results for the Graphic TSP on cubic
and subcubic graphs as well as the new inapproximability bounds for the
corresponding instances of the (1,2)-TSP. The proof technique uses new modular
constructions of simulating gadgets for the restricted cubic and subcubic
instances. The modular constructions used in the paper could be also of
independent interest
New Inapproximability Bounds for TSP
In this paper, we study the approximability of the metric Traveling Salesman
Problem (TSP) and prove new explicit inapproximability bounds for that problem.
The best up to now known hardness of approximation bounds were 185/184 for the
symmetric case (due to Lampis) and 117/116 for the asymmetric case (due to
Papadimitriou and Vempala). We construct here two new bounded occurrence CSP
reductions which improve these bounds to 123/122 and 75/74, respectively. The
latter bound is the first improvement in more than a decade for the case of the
asymmetric TSP. One of our main tools, which may be of independent interest, is
a new construction of a bounded degree wheel amplifier used in the proof of our
results
On the complexity of nonlinear mixed-integer optimization
This is a survey on the computational complexity of nonlinear mixed-integer
optimization. It highlights a selection of important topics, ranging from
incomputability results that arise from number theory and logic, to recently
obtained fully polynomial time approximation schemes in fixed dimension, and to
strongly polynomial-time algorithms for special cases.Comment: 26 pages, 5 figures; to appear in: Mixed-Integer Nonlinear
Optimization, IMA Volumes, Springer-Verla
Independent Set, Induced Matching, and Pricing: Connections and Tight (Subexponential Time) Approximation Hardnesses
We present a series of almost settled inapproximability results for three
fundamental problems. The first in our series is the subexponential-time
inapproximability of the maximum independent set problem, a question studied in
the area of parameterized complexity. The second is the hardness of
approximating the maximum induced matching problem on bounded-degree bipartite
graphs. The last in our series is the tight hardness of approximating the
k-hypergraph pricing problem, a fundamental problem arising from the area of
algorithmic game theory. In particular, assuming the Exponential Time
Hypothesis, our two main results are:
- For any r larger than some constant, any r-approximation algorithm for the
maximum independent set problem must run in at least
2^{n^{1-\epsilon}/r^{1+\epsilon}} time. This nearly matches the upper bound of
2^{n/r} (Cygan et al., 2008). It also improves some hardness results in the
domain of parameterized complexity (e.g., Escoffier et al., 2012 and Chitnis et
al., 2013)
- For any k larger than some constant, there is no polynomial time min
(k^{1-\epsilon}, n^{1/2-\epsilon})-approximation algorithm for the k-hypergraph
pricing problem, where n is the number of vertices in an input graph. This
almost matches the upper bound of min (O(k), \tilde O(\sqrt{n})) (by Balcan and
Blum, 2007 and an algorithm in this paper).
We note an interesting fact that, in contrast to n^{1/2-\epsilon} hardness
for polynomial-time algorithms, the k-hypergraph pricing problem admits
n^{\delta} approximation for any \delta >0 in quasi-polynomial time. This puts
this problem in a rare approximability class in which approximability
thresholds can be improved significantly by allowing algorithms to run in
quasi-polynomial time.Comment: The full version of FOCS 201
- …